| Literature DB >> 34548031 |
Lijuan Cheng1,2, Yan Gao3, Qing Xia4, Hui Wang2, Xiuzhen Xie2, Yurong Liu5, Heying Shang2, Yutao Diao6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to discover whether the vaginal microbe of women at childbearing age is different among groups defined by urogenital tract infections, childbearing history and menstrual cycle, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Alpha diversity; Lactobacillus; Microbiome; Microbiota; Relative anundance; beta diversity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34548031 PMCID: PMC8454066 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02300-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1a Alpha diversity by PD_whole_tree was lower in Normal women than in the other groups of gynecological infections and was significantly lower in normal women than in BV positive women(P<0.05). b Women in pregnancy (from ≥40 days gestation to parturition) had significant lower PD_whole_tree than those with childbearing. c Women in pregnancy had significant lower PD_whole_tree than those in follicular phase. d Means and 95% intervals of 10 genus-level relative abundances that had no significant difference among groups by childbearing history and menstrual cycle according to both ANOVA and nonparametric kruskal_wallis with Bonferroni correction. But the relative abundances of Gardnerella, Streptococcus, and an order-level relative abundance of Lactobacillales (NA (Firmcutes)) were significantly different among the 5 groups of gynecological infections. In a, b and c, the boxes are interquartile range (IQR); median values are the bands within the boxes; the line terminals outside the boxes are upper and lower endpoint of the data; crosses are outliers. In d, the lines are 95% intervals of genus-level relative abundance; mean values are icons in the middle of the 95% interval lines
Fig. 2The permutation of the 111 samples in a 3-dimensional space constructed by principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on Unweighted UniFrac distance. a upper: Samples in Normal group were clustered together (green dots in the rectangle) and had significant shorter genetic distance apart from samples in the other groups of gynecological infections. a lower: Unweighted UniFrac distance (beta diversity) of within-group (Normal) was significantly shorter versus that of between-groups (Normal vs the other gynecological infections). b upper: samples from in pregnancy group were clustered together (red dots in the rectangle) apart from samples in groups of with and without childbearing. b lower: Unweighted UniFrac distance of within-group (in pregnancy) was significantly shorter versus that of between-groups (in pregnancy vs with or without childbearing). c upper: samples from in pregnancy group were clustered together (blue dots in the rectangle) apart from samples in groups of luteal and follicular phase. c lower: Unweighted UniFrac distance of within-group (in pregnancy) was significantly shorter versus that of between-groups (in pregnancy vs in luteal or follicular phase). In a, b and c lower, the boxes are interquartile range (IQR) of Unweighted UniFrac distance; median values of distance are the bands within the boxes; the line terminals outside the boxes are upper and lower endpoint of the data; crosses are outliers. The tests of significance were performed using a two-sided Student’s two-sample t-test. The nonparametric P-values were calculated using 999 Monte Carlo permutations
Fig. 3The compositional profiles of the top 10 genera and dendrogram of the 4 sample grouping schemes (participants were grouped based on infections, menstrual cycle, childbearing history and infections & with or without gestation, respectively). The left side showed the genera and phylum (in parenthesis) that the genus were affiliated to with the average relative abundance (%) of each genus in the total 111 women shown in parenthesis. The dendrogram in the middle was based on hierarchical clustering using complete linkage of Unweighted UniFrac distance of the OUT table. Each horizontal bar in the right represents the compositional profile averaged within each sample group wherein the number in each bar indicates the percentage of genus lactobacillus. Only the top 10 abundant genera were shown and the other genera after the top 10 ones were artificially merged into one genus named ‘Others’
Fig. 4The compositional profiles of lactobacillus genus (including 10 known lactobacillus species, the unknown ones were all ascribed to a species named lactobacillus Other) in 4 grouping schemes (participants were grouped based on infections, menstrual cycle, childbearing history and infections & with or without gestation, respectively). The average relative abundances (%) in the total 111 women were shown in parenthesis after each species. Each bar represents the compositional profile of lactobacillus species averaged within each group with the average relative abundances (%) of the 2 most abundant species (lactobacillus iners and lactobacillus helveticus) were shown