| Literature DB >> 34546628 |
Kalyan Biswas1, José I Urgel1, Kun Xu2, Ji Ma2, Ana Sánchez-Grande1, Pingo Mutombo3, Aurelio Gallardo3,4, Koen Lauwaet1, Benjamin Mallada3,5, Bruno de la Torre3,5, Adam Matěj3,5, José M Gallego6, Rodolfo Miranda1,7, Pavel Jelínek3,5, Xinliang Feng2, David Écija1.
Abstract
The atomically precise control over the size, shape and structure of nanographenes (NGs) or the introduction of heteroatom dopants into their sp2 -carbon lattice confer them valuable electronic, optical and magnetic properties. Herein, we report on the design and synthesis of a hexabenzocoronene derivative embedded with graphitic nitrogen in its honeycomb lattice, achieved via on-surface assisted cyclodehydrogenation on the Au(111) surface. Combined scanning tunnelling microscopy/spectroscopy and non-contact atomic force microscopy investigations unveil the chemical and electronic structures of the obtained dicationic NG. Kelvin probe force microscopy measurements reveal a considerable variation of the local contact potential difference toward lower values with respect to the gold surface, indicative of its positive net charge. Altogether, we introduce the concept of cationic nitrogen doping of NGs on surfaces, opening new avenues for the design of novel carbon nanostructures.Entities:
Keywords: cationic species; nanographenes; nc-AFM; scanning tunnelling microscopy; surface chemistry
Year: 2021 PMID: 34546628 PMCID: PMC9298296 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202111863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Figure 1Representative synthesis of graphitic nitrogen‐doped nanographenes on surfaces (I–VI).[ , , , , ]
Scheme 1Solution and on‐surface synthesis of the dicationic diphenyl‐diazahexabenzocoronene nanographene.
Figure 2On‐surface synthesis of diphenyl‐diazahexabenzocoronene (2) on Au (111). a) Overview STM topographic image after annealing the substrate at 300 °C. V b=200 mV, I t=120 pA. Scale bar: 5 nm. b) High‐resolution constant‐current STM image of one of the individual species 2 shown in (a) acquired with a CO‐functionalized tip. V b=10 mV, I t=40 pA. Scale bar: 0.5 nm. c) Constant‐height UHR‐STM image, acquired with a CO‐functionalized tip, revealing the formation of hexagons via cyclodehydrogenation of the molecular precursor 1. V b=5 mV, I t=30 pA. Scale bar: 0.5 nm. d) DFT equilibrium geometry of the molecule highlighted in panel (c). Top (left) and side (right ) views of the DFT equilibrium geometry of 2 on Au (111). e) Constant‐height frequency‐shift nc‐AFM images of (c) acquired with a CO‐functionalized tip. Herein, C−C bonds are undoubtedly identified, while N−C bonds appear at a more negative frequency shift. Z offset=175 pm above the STM set point: 5 mV, 30 pA. Scale bar: 0.5 nm. f) Calculated frequency shift nc‐AFM images of 2 shown in (d). Scale bar: 0.5 nm.
Figure 3Electronic properties and aromaticity of 2 on Au(111). a) dI/dV spectra acquired on 2 at the position indicated by the red and blue crosses on the STM image shown in the inset. The black line corresponds to the reference spectra taken on the bare Au(111) surface. b) Constant‐current dI/dV maps (left) of 2 on Au(111) and corresponding DFT‐calculated LDOS maps of dicationic 2 in the gas phase (right) at the energetic positions corresponding to the LUMO (top left) and LUMO+1 (bottom left) peaks, respectively. Open feedback parameters for the experimental dI/dV maps, LUMO: V b=0.6 V, I t=250 pA, V rms=20 mV, LUMO+1: V b=1.30 V, I t=250 pA, V rms=20 mV. All scale bars: 0.5 nm. c) PDOS of 2 calculated in the gas phase for a neutral species (black curve) and the PDOS of 2 on the Au(111) surface (blue curve), where the HOMO clearly crossing the Fermi level can be discerned. d) ACID analysis of 2 calculated in the gas phase. Red arrows show the diatropic currents. Isovalue=0.055 a.u. e) Kekulé structure of 2. Blue filled benzenoid rings denote Clar sextets.
Figure 4Charge distribution of 2. a) Frequency shift dependence with V bias voltage acquired with a CO‐functionalized tip at the center (brown) and phenyl position (green) of 2, as well as on the pristine Au(111) surface (blue) as shown in the STM image inset. The three measurements were acquired at the same tip‐sample distance. b) STM image and KPFM map (top and middle panels, respectively) and corresponding simulation of 2 on Au(111) (bottom panel, calculated height=11.5 Å), revealing the strong variation of the LCPD due to the presence of positively charged species 2. Scale bars: 0.3 nm.