Literature DB >> 34546462

US hysterectomy prevalence by age, race and ethnicity from BRFSS and NHIS: implications for analyses of cervical and uterine cancer rates.

Emily E Adam1,2, Mary C White3, Mona Saraiya3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous reports of gynecologic cancer rates have adjusted for hysterectomy prevalence with data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) or the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We sought to determine if BRFSS and NHIS produce similar estimates of hysterectomy prevalence.
METHODS: Using data from BRFSS and NHIS, we calculated hysterectomy prevalence for women aged 20-79 years, stratified by 10-year age groups, survey year (2010, 2018), and race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaskan Native, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic all other race groups).
RESULTS: BRFSS and NHIS produced similar increasing trends in hysterectomy prevalence by age and directional differences by race and ethnicity. Fewer than 2% of women aged 20-29 years and more than 4 out of 10 women aged 70-79 years reported having had a hysterectomy.
CONCLUSION: Our analyses suggest adjustment for hysterectomy prevalence with data from either survey would likely reduce distortion in cervical and uterine cancer rates. BRFSS, a survey which has a larger sample size than NHIS, may better support analyses of hysterectomy estimates for smaller subpopulations.
© 2021. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System; Cervical cancer; Hysterectomy; National Health Interview Survey; Uterine cancer; Women’s health

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34546462      PMCID: PMC8738136          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-021-01496-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  18 in total

1.  Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy prevalence on rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Charlene A Wong; Melissa A Jim; Jessica King; Lillian Tom-Orme; Jeffrey A Henderson; Mona Saraiya; Lisa C Richardson; Larry Layne; Anil Suryaprasad; David K Espey
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Hysterectomy-corrected rates of endometrial cancer among women younger than age 50 in the United States.

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Elise C Kohn; Lynne Penberthy; Kathleen A Cronin; Lisa Rubinsak; Lois A Dickie; Lori Minasian; Anne-Michelle Noone
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cervical Cancer Screening and Incidence by Age: Unmet Needs Near and After the Stopping Age for Screening.

Authors:  Mary C White; Meredith L Shoemaker; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Hysterectomy Practice Patterns in the Postmorcellation Era.

Authors:  Elisa M Jorgensen; Anna M Modest; Hye-Chun Hur; Michele R Hacker; Christopher S Awtrey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States.

Authors:  Anna L Beavis; Patti E Gravitt; Anne F Rositch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among Hispanic subgroups in the USA: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey 2008, 2010, and 2013.

Authors:  Meredith L Shoemaker; Mary C White
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Higher prevalence of hysterectomy among rural women than urban women: Implications for measures of disparities in uterine and cervical cancers.

Authors:  Emily E Adam; Mary C White; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.667

9.  Integrating Surveillance Data to Estimate Race/Ethnicity-specific Hysterectomy Inequalities Among Reproductive-aged Women: Who's at Risk?

Authors:  Danielle R Gartner; Paul L Delamater; Robert A Hummer; Jennifer L Lund; Brian W Pence; Whitney R Robinson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.860

10.  Validity of self-reported hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Henry Taylor; Jatinderpal Kalsi; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sophia Apostolidou; Stuart Campbell; Ian Jacobs; Usha Menon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk of clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix among US women with potential exposure to diethylstilbestrol in utero.

Authors:  Mary C White; Hannah K Weir; Ashwini V Soman; Lucy A Peipins; Trevor D Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.532

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.