Literature DB >> 30870280

Hysterectomy Practice Patterns in the Postmorcellation Era.

Elisa M Jorgensen1, Anna M Modest, Hye-Chun Hur, Michele R Hacker, Christopher S Awtrey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize long-term national trends in surgical approach for hysterectomy after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning against power morcellation for laparoscopic specimen removal.
METHODS: This was a descriptive study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2012 to 2016. We identified hysterectomies using Current Procedural Terminology codes. We used an interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate abdominal and supracervical hysterectomy trends surrounding The Wall Street Journal article first reporting morcellation safety concerns and the FDA safety communication. We compared categorical and continuous variables using χ, t, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
RESULTS: We identified 179,950 hysterectomies; laparoscopy was the most common mode of hysterectomy in every quarter. Before The Wall Street Journal article, there was no significant change in proportion of abdominal hysterectomies (0.3% decrease/quarter, P=.14). After The Wall Street Journal article, use of abdominal hysterectomy increased 1.1% per quarter for two quarters through the FDA warning (P<.001), plateaued for three quarters until March 2015 (P=.65), then decreased by 0.8% per quarter through 2016 (P<.001). Supracervical hysterectomy volume continuously decreased after the FDA warning (1.0% decrease per quarter, P<.001) and after three quarters (0.7% decrease per quarter, P=.01), then plateaued from April 2015 through 2016 (0.05% decrease per quarter, P=.40). Mode of supracervical hysterectomy was unchanged from 2012 to 2013 (P=.43), followed by two quarters of significant increase in proportion of supracervical abdominal hysterectomies (11.7%/quarter, P<.001). This change in mode of supracervical hysterectomy then plateaued through 2016 (P=.06).
CONCLUSION: Despite early studies suggesting that minimally invasive hysterectomy decreased in response to safety concerns regarding power morcellation, we found that this effect reversed 1 year after the FDA safety communication. However, there was a sustained decline in supracervical hysterectomy, and the remaining supracervical hysterectomies were more likely to be performed using laparotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30870280     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  US hysterectomy prevalence by age, race and ethnicity from BRFSS and NHIS: implications for analyses of cervical and uterine cancer rates.

Authors:  Emily E Adam; Mary C White; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Higher prevalence of hysterectomy among rural women than urban women: Implications for measures of disparities in uterine and cervical cancers.

Authors:  Emily E Adam; Mary C White; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.667

3.  Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Vrunda B Desai; Jason D Wright; Haiqun Lin; Peter E Schwartz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 10.693

4.  Preoperative MRI and LDH in women undergoing intra-abdominal surgery for fibroids: Effect on surgical route.

Authors:  Annie Kim; Leslie Boyd; Nancy Ringel; Jessica Meyer; Genevieve Bennett; Veronica Lerner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?

Authors:  Felix Neis; Christl Reisenauer; Bernhard Kraemer; Philipp Wagner; Sara Brucker
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Safety Warning about Laparoscopic Power Morcellation in Hysterectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of National Impact.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Vrunda B Desai; Peter E Schwartz; Cary P Gross; Haiqun Lin; Maria J Schymura; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-03-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.