Literature DB >> 34544861

Gender inequities in the online dissemination of scholars' work.

Orsolya Vásárhelyi1,2, Igor Zakhlebin3, Staša Milojević4, Emőke-Ágnes Horvát5,6,7.   

Abstract

Unbiased science dissemination has the potential to alleviate some of the known gender disparities in academia by exposing female scholars' work to other scientists and the public. And yet, we lack comprehensive understanding of the relationship between gender and science dissemination online. Our large-scale analyses, encompassing half a million scholars, revealed that female scholars' work is mentioned less frequently than male scholars' work in all research areas. When exploring the characteristics associated with online success, we found that the impact of prior work, social capital, and gendered tie formation in coauthorship networks are linked with online success for men, but not for women-even in the areas with the highest female representation. These results suggest that while men's scientific impact and collaboration networks are associated with higher visibility online, there are no universally identifiable facets associated with success for women. Our comprehensive empirical evidence indicates that the gender gap in online science dissemination is coupled with a lack of understanding the characteristics that are linked with female scholars' success, which might hinder efforts to close the gender gap in visibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  STEM; computational social science; gender inequality; scholarly communication; social networks

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34544861      PMCID: PMC8488645          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102945118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  27 in total

1.  Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark.

Authors:  Roberta Kwok
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science.

Authors:  Mathias Wullum Nielsen; Sharla Alegria; Love Börjeson; Henry Etzkowitz; Holly J Falk-Krzesinski; Aparna Joshi; Erin Leahey; Laurel Smith-Doerr; Anita Williams Woolley; Londa Schiebinger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Social media for scientists.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 28.824

4.  The science of sharing and the sharing of science.

Authors:  Katherine L Milkman; Jonah Berger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  How gender determines the way we speak about professionals.

Authors:  Stav Atir; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists.

Authors:  Jordan D Dworkin; Kristin A Linn; Erin G Teich; Perry Zurn; Russell T Shinohara; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  The paradox of critical mass for women in science.

Authors:  H Etzkowitz; C Kemelgor; M Neuschatz; B Uzzi; J Alonzo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Women and heart disease, the underrecognized burden: sex differences, biases, and unmet clinical and research challenges.

Authors:  Stacy Westerman; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.124

9.  The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented?

Authors:  Luke Holman; Devi Stuart-Fox; Cindy E Hauser
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  The Use of Social Media to Increase the Impact of Health Research: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marco Bardus; Rola El Rassi; Mohamad Chahrour; Elie W Akl; Abdul Sattar Raslan; Lokman I Meho; Elie A Akl
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  3 in total

1.  Virtual collaboration hinders a key component of creativity.

Authors:  Emőke-Ágnes Horvát; Brian Uzzi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  "Broad" Impact: Perceptions of Sex/Gender-Related Psychology Journals.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Brown; Jessi L Smith; Doralyn Rossmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-03

3.  Trends of research productivity across author gender and research fields: A multidisciplinary and multi-country observational study.

Authors:  Milad Haghani; Alireza Abbasi; Clara C Zwack; Zahra Shahhoseini; Nick Haslam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.