Literature DB >> 3454318

The point-spread function of the eye from 0 degrees to 100 degrees and the pattern electroretinogram.

T J van den Berg1, B Boltjes.   

Abstract

In studies on the pattern electroretinogram the quality of the retinal image is a major concern. The use of contact lens electrodes was rejected since a good pattern could not be recorded. This is believed to be due to blurring of the retinal image. As indicator of image quality the patient's visual acuity is often used. We wondered whether this is a sufficient criterion. The retinal image is the product of the whole optical point-spread function of the eye whereas visual acuity refers only to the central portion of this function. On the basis of existing reports it can be estimated that for the young normal eye the outer edges of this function (straylight) causes considerable loss of contrast. The strength of the straylight can be much greater in older eyes. We studied the relation between the point-spread function including straylight and the pattern electroretinogram in normal eyes and some pathological cases. The measurements proved to follow the calculated contrasts on the basis of a local luminance model, with the exception of enhancement (tuning) around 60' checksize for the young normal eye. Because of the considerable differences in straylight in an older population one has to take into account that loss of pattern electroretinogram can be suffered in patients with otherwise good visual acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3454318     DOI: 10.1007/BF00143952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  7 in total

1.  Light profiles of the foveal image of a point source.

Authors:  J J Vos; J Walraven; A van Meeteren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Electroretinograms evoked in man by local uniform or patterned stimulation.

Authors:  G B Arden
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The luminance origin of the pattern electroretinogram in man.

Authors:  F C Riemslag; J L Ringo; H Spekreijse; H F Verduyn Lunel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Flicker and movement constituents of the pattern reversal response.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; G Dagnelie; J Maier; D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Optical quality of the human eye.

Authors:  F W Campbell; R W Gubisch
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Importance of pathological intraocular light scatter for visual disability.

Authors:  T J van den Berg
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-15       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Normative data for a user-friendly paradigm for pattern electroretinogram recording.

Authors:  Vittorio Porciatti; Lori M Ventura
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Different effect of dioptric defocus vs. light scatter on the pattern electroretinogram (PERG).

Authors:  Michael Bach; Marcel Mathieu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  [Electrophysiological examination methods in glaucoma diagnostics].

Authors:  C M Poloschek; M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Pattern electroretinogram to detect glaucoma: comparing the PERGLA and the PERG Ratio protocols.

Authors:  Michael Bach; Anke Ramharter-Sereinig
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Pattern electroretinogram can be more than the sum of local luminance responses.

Authors:  T J van den Berg; B Boltjes; H Spekreijse
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Two methods of lens opacity measurements in glaucomas.

Authors:  F K Horn; A G Jünemann; M Korth
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Functional quantification of diaphany.

Authors:  T J Van den Berg; J K Ijspeert; P W de Waard; F Meire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Red glasses and visual function in retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  T J Van den Berg
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Calculating Retinal Contrast from Scene Content: A Program.

Authors:  John J McCann; Vassilios Vonikakis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.