Literature DB >> 34534536

Genomic and Molecular Analyses Identify Molecular Subtypes of Pancreatic Cancer Recurrence.

Stephan B Dreyer1, Rosie Upstill-Goddard2, Assya Legrini2, Andrew V Biankin3, Nigel B Jamieson6, David K Chang7, Nigel B Jamieson6, David K Chang7.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34534536      PMCID: PMC8721486          DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


× No keyword cloud information.
Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains a highly lethal malignancy, and most patients with localized disease that undergo surgical resection still succumb to recurrent disease. Pattern of recurrence after pancreatectomy is heterogenous, with some studies illustrating that site of recurrence can be associated with prognosis. Another study suggested that tumors that develop local and distant recurrence can be regarded as a homogenous disease with similar outcomes. Here we investigate novel molecular determinants of recurrence pattern after pancreatectomy for PC. Recurrence patterns were classified as liver, lung, local only, and other distant, whereas the no recurrence group was defined as those that did not develop any recurrence during the study period (minimum of 24 months of follow-up). Genomic, transcriptomic, immunohistochemical, and clinical data of primary resected tumor specimens from the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative (Australian contribution to the International Cancer Genome Consortium) PC cohort were used in the molecular analysis (n = 435). Full methods and description of cohort undergoing each analysis are available in the Supplementary Methods section. Liver metastases after pancreatectomy (median survival, 16.0 months) was associated with significantly worse disease-specific survival than lung (29.7 months) and local recurrence (25.6 months; P < .001; Supplementary Figure 1a). Liver recurrence after pancreatectomy was associated with poor tumor differentiation (P < .001). Margin status (P = .217) and lymph node status did not predict recurrence patterns (P = .062).
Supplementary Figure 1

(A) Kaplan-Meier curve of disease-specific survival stratified by recurrence pattern in all 3 cohorts (total n = 1087). Only those with recurrent disease (n = 704) are shown. (B) Proportion of each recurrence pattern in patients with classical and squamous subtype. Squamous subtype enriched for liver recurrence (P < .001); classical subtype associated with lung recurrence (P = .007). Bar chart demonstrates the relative proportions of each molecular subtype in different recurrence patterns. Proportion is based on the frequency of each recurrence pattern per molecular subtype. (C) Proportion of gene mutations in each recurrence pattern. P value calculated using chi-square. (D) Table of significantly mutated gene analysis in recurrence patterns. A significant q value (<0.05) represents an association between mutation and recurrence pattern. Only BRAF (liver) and RNF43 (no recurrence) were significant in specific recurrence patterns. (E) Table of clinical, molecular, and pathologic features of RNF43 mutants in analyzed cohort.

Patients from the Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative cohort were categorized based on transcriptional expression of the primary tumor as squamous (basal-like) or classical. Squamous tumors correlated with liver recurrence and short disease-free survival after pancreatectomy (P < .001; Figure 1a, Supplementary Figure 1b). Conversely, lung recurrence significantly correlated with the classical subtype (P = .007).
Figure 1

(A) Heatmap of RNA sequenced cases with disease recurrence pattern. Heatmap demonstrates recurrence pattern, molecular subtype, relative expression of key genes of PC, classical and squamous subtype lineage, and outcome. (B) KRAS allelic imbalance and whole genome doubling in recurrence patterns. Scale is based on proportion of overall cohort. Dark shade represents no whole genome doubling and light shade whole genome doubling for each recurrence pattern stratified by KRAS allelic status. P value calculated for KRAS imbalance in liver versus all other recurrence patterns using chi-square test. (C) Relevant molecular pathways enriched in specific recurrence patterns categorized by gene module defined by Bailey et al. Size of bar proportional to statistical weight, horizontal scale numerical for P. (D) Stromal signatures as defined by Puleo et al for each recurrence pattern. P calculated as analysis of variance between groups. (E) Heatmap of relative immune cell infiltration histoscore in different recurrence patterns. Histoscore represents cumulative score for all tissue microarray cores per patient.

(A) Heatmap of RNA sequenced cases with disease recurrence pattern. Heatmap demonstrates recurrence pattern, molecular subtype, relative expression of key genes of PC, classical and squamous subtype lineage, and outcome. (B) KRAS allelic imbalance and whole genome doubling in recurrence patterns. Scale is based on proportion of overall cohort. Dark shade represents no whole genome doubling and light shade whole genome doubling for each recurrence pattern stratified by KRAS allelic status. P value calculated for KRAS imbalance in liver versus all other recurrence patterns using chi-square test. (C) Relevant molecular pathways enriched in specific recurrence patterns categorized by gene module defined by Bailey et al. Size of bar proportional to statistical weight, horizontal scale numerical for P. (D) Stromal signatures as defined by Puleo et al for each recurrence pattern. P calculated as analysis of variance between groups. (E) Heatmap of relative immune cell infiltration histoscore in different recurrence patterns. Histoscore represents cumulative score for all tissue microarray cores per patient. The proportion of BRAF and RNF43 mutations were higher in the liver and no recurrence groups, respectively (Supplementary Figure 1c). These failed to be below the P < .05 significance level, likely due to insufficient power due to the infrequent mutations. Significantly mutated gene analyses identified RNF43 mutations (q < 0.001) to be associated with the no recurrence group and BRAF mutations (q = 0.020) to be associated with the liver recurrence group (Supplementary Figure 1d). No other gene mutation was significantly associated with a recurrence pattern. Only 1 RNF43 mutant was pathologically described as an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with invasion (Supplementary Figure 1e). In those that developed no recurrence, almost all patients (90%) had balanced KRAS allelic status (Supplementary Figure 2a), whereas KRAS imbalance was a feature of primary tumors that developed liver recurrence (Figure 1b, Supplementary Figure 2a). KRAS wild type or mutation type did not associate with any recurrence pattern (Supplementary Figure 2a).
Supplementary Figure 2

(A) Table demonstrating frequency of KRAS allelic imbalance and whole genome doubling in recurrence patterns of PCAWG cohort. (B) Transcriptional modules defined as significant by Bailey et al in each recurrence group for patients with RNA sequencing data. Significant modules that are associated with recurrence patterns are highlighted with black arrow on left y-axis. Key processes and gene programs previously described by Bailey et al that define squamous and classical pancreatic (pancreatic progenitor, immunogenic, ADEX) subtypes are highlighted along right-hand y-axis. (C) Relative enrichment score of genes associated with recurrence pattern in each module that associated with recurrence pattern, from the APGI microarray cohort. Statistical significance levels are ∗≤.05, ∗∗≤.01, ∗∗∗≤.001, and ∗∗∗∗≤.0001 with the first given recurrence pattern as reference (for example, for green, yellow, and orange modules the reference is liver, for light yellow it is local, and for turquoise and grey 60 the reference is lung).

Transcriptional networks and gene programs that were identified as key features of the squamous subtype, significantly associated with liver recurrence (Figure 1a, Supplementary Figure 2b). Pathways that predispose to liver recurrence included cell cycle checkpoint activation, epidermal growth factor signaling, glycolysis, and hypoxia (Figure 1c, Supplementary Figure 2c). Lung recurrence was strongly associated with the classical subtype and was enriched for transcriptional pathways regulating pluripotent stem cells and endoplasmic reticulum stress (Figure 1c). Next, we investigated additional molecular differences between liver and lung recurrence, the most common metastatic sites in PC. In addition to enrichment in the gene programs described, liver recurrence was, relative to lung recurrence, enriched in pathways associated with innate immune response, interferon signaling, and antiviral response (Figure 1c). Local recurrence was enriched for networks associated with neuronal signaling and neuron cell-cell interaction (Figure 1c). This may reflect the local infiltrative nature of these tumors into the peri-pancreatic nerve plexuses which predisposes to local recurrence despite negative resection margins. Local and no recurrence groups were associated with transcriptional networks associated with immunogenic activation and infiltration (Figure 1c). By applying the stromal subtypes described by Puleo et al, enrichment of the structural vascularized stroma subtype (P = .020) was found in the local recurrence group (Figure 1d). Immunohistochemistry of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) cohort showed that those that developed no recurrence were enriched for infiltration of CD3+ T cells (P = .009), and the local and no recurrence groups were enriched for CD163+ macrophages (P = .029; Figure 1e). The liver and other recurrence groups were relatively enriched for CD68+ macrophages (P = .034). Here we demonstrate the impact of novel, previously undefined molecular features of the primary tumor on spatiotemporal recurrence patterns after pancreatectomy for PC. Liver recurrence is associated with significantly shorter disease-free and overall survival. TP63 expression, cell cycle checkpoint activation, epidermal growth factor signaling, glycolysis, and hypoxia are features of the squamous (basal-like) subtype and strongly associated with liver recurrence. When compared with lung recurrence, the liver recurrence group was enriched for inflammatory pathways likely driven by chronic inflammation secondary to genomic instability and constitutional STING (Stimulator of Interferon Genes) activation that is a feature of the squamous subtype. Lung recurrence was associated with the classical subtype and longer disease-free and overall survival. In addition, local and no recurrence groups had very similar transcriptomic profiles with favorable immune signaling compared with those that develop distant metastases based on transcriptome. The no recurrence group was enriched for CD3+ immune cell infiltration. Quantification of immune cell infiltration alone may be insufficient to delineate specific stromal signaling and its influence of this on recurrence pattern and highlights the potential contribution of a cell autonomous signaling mechanism. The no recurrence group was enriched for RNF43 mutations, yet only 1 (lung recurrence group) of the RNF43 mutants histologically resembled IPMN with invasion and this does not explain the better prognosis associated with these mutations. This highlights the association of these mutations with primary PC out with the setting of transformed IPMN. This study is limited by only having primary tumor samples available for analysis. Parallel molecular profiling of primary and metastatic tumors, accrued through multi-institutional studies, such as Precision-Panc, will allow more detailed analyses of pathways and processes that define and promote recurrent disease. In summary, our results demonstrate that resected pancreatic cancers should not be considered to harbor the same “systemic” disease. Liver recurrence is the dominant spatiotemporal phenotype, with primary tumors enriched for specific molecular features that differ from those that develop lung or local recurrence. Delineating these processes, and their influence on priming the metastatic niche, dissemination, and seeding of tumor cells warrants further study to inform personalized adjuvant antimetastatic agents and surveillance strategies.
  13 in total

1.  clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters.

Authors:  Guangchuang Yu; Li-Gen Wang; Yanyan Han; Qing-Yu He
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Peter Bailey; David K Chang; Katia Nones; Amber L Johns; Ann-Marie Patch; Marie-Claude Gingras; David K Miller; Angelika N Christ; Tim J C Bruxner; Michael C Quinn; Craig Nourse; L Charles Murtaugh; Ivon Harliwong; Senel Idrisoglu; Suzanne Manning; Ehsan Nourbakhsh; Shivangi Wani; Lynn Fink; Oliver Holmes; Venessa Chin; Matthew J Anderson; Stephen Kazakoff; Conrad Leonard; Felicity Newell; Nick Waddell; Scott Wood; Qinying Xu; Peter J Wilson; Nicole Cloonan; Karin S Kassahn; Darrin Taylor; Kelly Quek; Alan Robertson; Lorena Pantano; Laura Mincarelli; Luis N Sanchez; Lisa Evers; Jianmin Wu; Mark Pinese; Mark J Cowley; Marc D Jones; Emily K Colvin; Adnan M Nagrial; Emily S Humphrey; Lorraine A Chantrill; Amanda Mawson; Jeremy Humphris; Angela Chou; Marina Pajic; Christopher J Scarlett; Andreia V Pinho; Marc Giry-Laterriere; Ilse Rooman; Jaswinder S Samra; James G Kench; Jessica A Lovell; Neil D Merrett; Christopher W Toon; Krishna Epari; Nam Q Nguyen; Andrew Barbour; Nikolajs Zeps; Kim Moran-Jones; Nigel B Jamieson; Janet S Graham; Fraser Duthie; Karin Oien; Jane Hair; Robert Grützmann; Anirban Maitra; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Christopher L Wolfgang; Richard A Morgan; Rita T Lawlor; Vincenzo Corbo; Claudio Bassi; Borislav Rusev; Paola Capelli; Roberto Salvia; Giampaolo Tortora; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Gloria M Petersen; Donna M Munzy; William E Fisher; Saadia A Karim; James R Eshleman; Ralph H Hruban; Christian Pilarsky; Jennifer P Morton; Owen J Sansom; Aldo Scarpa; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Ulla-Maja Hagbo Bailey; Oliver Hofmann; Robert L Sutherland; David A Wheeler; Anthony J Gill; Richard A Gibbs; John V Pearson; Nicola Waddell; Andrew V Biankin; Sean M Grimmond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Patterns of Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Secondary Analysis of the ESPAC-4 Randomized Adjuvant Chemotherapy Trial.

Authors:  Robert P Jones; Eftychia-Eirini Psarelli; Richard Jackson; Paula Ghaneh; Christopher M Halloran; Daniel H Palmer; Fiona Campbell; Juan W Valle; Olusola Faluyi; Derek A O'Reilly; David Cunningham; Jonathan Wadsley; Suzanne Darby; Tim Meyer; Roopinder Gillmore; Alan Anthoney; Pehr Lind; Bengt Glimelius; Stephen Falk; Jakob R Izbicki; Gary William Middleton; Sebastian Cummins; Paul J Ross; Harpreet Wasan; Alec McDonald; Tom Crosby; Yuk Ting; Kinnari Patel; David Sherriff; Rubin Soomal; David Borg; Sharmila Sothi; Pascal Hammel; Markus M Lerch; Julia Mayerle; Christine Tjaden; Oliver Strobel; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Transcription phenotypes of pancreatic cancer are driven by genomic events during tumor evolution.

Authors:  Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue; Jaeseung C Kim; Gavin W Wilson; Karen Ng; Eugenia Flores Figueroa; Grainne M O'Kane; Ashton A Connor; Robert E Denroche; Robert C Grant; Jessica McLeod; Julie M Wilson; Gun Ho Jang; Amy Zhang; Anna Dodd; Sheng-Ben Liang; Ayelet Borgida; Dianne Chadwick; Sangeetha Kalimuthu; Ilinca Lungu; John M S Bartlett; Paul M Krzyzanowski; Vandana Sandhu; Hervé Tiriac; Fieke E M Froeling; Joanna M Karasinska; James T Topham; Daniel J Renouf; David F Schaeffer; Steven J M Jones; Marco A Marra; Janessa Laskin; Runjan Chetty; Lincoln D Stein; George Zogopoulos; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Peter J Campbell; David A Tuveson; Jennifer J Knox; Sandra E Fischer; Steven Gallinger; Faiyaz Notta
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Stratification of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas Based on Tumor and Microenvironment Features.

Authors:  Francesco Puleo; Rémy Nicolle; Yuna Blum; Jérôme Cros; Laetitia Marisa; Pieter Demetter; Eric Quertinmont; Magali Svrcek; Nabila Elarouci; Juan Iovanna; Denis Franchimont; Laurine Verset; Maria Gomez Galdon; Jacques Devière; Aurélien de Reyniès; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Raphaël Maréchal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Targeting DNA Damage Response and Replication Stress in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Stephan B Dreyer; Rosie Upstill-Goddard; Viola Paulus-Hock; Clara Paris; Eirini-Maria Lampraki; Eloise Dray; Bryan Serrels; Giuseppina Caligiuri; Selma Rebus; Dennis Plenker; Zachary Galluzzo; Holly Brunton; Richard Cunningham; Mathias Tesson; Craig Nourse; Ulla-Maja Bailey; Marc Jones; Kim Moran-Jones; Derek W Wright; Fraser Duthie; Karin Oien; Lisa Evers; Colin J McKay; Grant A McGregor; Aditi Gulati; Rachel Brough; Ilirjana Bajrami; Stephan Pettitt; Michele L Dziubinski; Juliana Candido; Frances Balkwill; Simon T Barry; Robert Grützmann; Lola Rahib; Amber Johns; Marina Pajic; Fieke E M Froeling; Phillip Beer; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Gloria M Petersen; Alan Ashworth; Margaret C Frame; Howard C Crawford; Diane M Simeone; Chris Lord; Debabrata Mukhopadhyay; Christian Pilarsky; David A Tuveson; Susanna L Cooke; Nigel B Jamieson; Jennifer P Morton; Owen J Sansom; Peter J Bailey; Andrew V Biankin; David K Chang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome.

Authors:  Bo Li; Colin N Dewey
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Aggressive PDACs Show Hypomethylation of Repetitive Elements and the Execution of an Intrinsic IFN Program Linked to a Ductal Cell of Origin.

Authors:  Zuguang Gu; Charles D Imbusch; Martin R Sprick; Andreas Trumpp; Elisa Espinet; Nathalia A Giese; Magdalena Büscher; Mariam Safavi; Silke Weisenburger; Corinna Klein; Vanessa Vogel; Mattia Falcone; Jacob Insua-Rodríguez; Manuel Reitberger; Vera Thiel; Steffi O Kossi; Alexander Muckenhuber; Karnjit Sarai; Alex Y L Lee; Elyne Backx; Soheila Zarei; Matthias M Gaida; Manuel Rodríguez-Paredes; Elisa Donato; Hsi-Yu Yen; Roland Eils; Matthias Schlesner; Nicole Pfarr; Thilo Hackert; Christoph Plass; Benedikt Brors; Katja Steiger; Dieter Weichenhan; H Efsun Arda; Ilse Rooman; Janel L Kopp; Oliver Strobel; Wilko Weichert
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 38.272

9.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data.

Authors:  Mark D Robinson; Davis J McCarthy; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis.

Authors:  Peter Langfelder; Steve Horvath
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  Loss of Rnf43 Accelerates Kras-Mediated Neoplasia and Remodels the Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Abdel Nasser Hosein; Gita Dangol; Takashi Okumura; Jason Roszik; Kimal Rajapakshe; Megan Siemann; Mohamed Zaid; Bidyut Ghosh; Maria Monberg; Paola A Guerrero; Aatur Singhi; Cara L Haymaker; Hans Clevers; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem; Sonja M Woermann; Anirban Maitra
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  The Trinity: Interplay among Cancer Cells, Fibroblasts, and Immune Cells in Pancreatic Cancer and Implication of CD8+ T Cell-Orientated Therapy.

Authors:  Yu-Hsuan Hung; Li-Tzong Chen; Wen-Chun Hung
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-18

3.  Gene Coexpression Network Characterizing Microenvironmental Heterogeneity and Intercellular Communication in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Implications of Prognostic Significance and Therapeutic Target.

Authors:  Chengsi Wu; Yizhen Liu; Dianhui Wei; Li Tao; Lili Yuan; Tiantian Jing; Boshi Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Tissue metabolomics identified new biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Henan Qin; Huiying Liu; Tianfu Wei; Zeming Wu; Mengxue Shang; Haihua Liu; Aman Wang; Jiwei Liu; Dong Shang; Peiyuan Yin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  The Significance of FDG PET/CT-Derived Parameters in Determining Prognosis of Cases with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Hwaida M Mokhtar; Amira Youssef; Tamer M Naguib; Amr A Magdy; Samir A Salama; Ahmed M Kabel; Nesreen M Sabry
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.