Francesco Puleo1, Rémy Nicolle2, Yuna Blum2, Jérôme Cros3, Laetitia Marisa2, Pieter Demetter4, Eric Quertinmont5, Magali Svrcek6, Nabila Elarouci2, Juan Iovanna7, Denis Franchimont8, Laurine Verset4, Maria Gomez Galdon9, Jacques Devière10, Aurélien de Reyniès2, Pierre Laurent-Puig11, Jean-Luc Van Laethem10, Jean-Baptiste Bachet12, Raphaël Maréchal10. 1. Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: francesco.puleo@bordet.be. 2. Programme Cartes d'Identité des Tumeurs (CIT), Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer, Paris, France. 3. Department of Pathology, Beaujon Hospital-Paris Diderot University, Clichy, France. 4. Department of Pathology, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. 5. Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 6. Department of Pathology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France. 7. Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille, INSERM U1068, CNRS UMR 7258, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France. 8. Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. 9. Department of Pathology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 10. Laboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. 11. Université Paris Descartes UMRS-1147; Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France. 12. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université, Department of Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpetriére Hospital, Paris, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Genomic studies have revealed subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) based on their molecular features, but different studies have reported different classification systems. It is a challenge to obtain high-quality, freshly frozen tissue for clinical analysis and determination of PDA subtypes. We aimed to redefine subtypes of PDA using a large number of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded PDA samples, which are more amenable to routine clinical evaluation. METHODS: We collected PDA samples from 309 consecutive patients who underwent surgery from September 1996 through December 2010 at 4 academic hospitals in Europe; nontumor tissue samples were not included. Samples were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. DNA and RNA were isolated; gene expression, targeted DNA sequencing, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. We used independent component analysis to deconvolute normal, tumor, and microenvironment transcriptome patterns in samples. We devised classification systems from an unsupervised analysis using a consensus clustering approach of our data set after removing normal contamination components. We associated subtypes with overall survival and disease-free survival of patients using Cox proportional hazards regression with estimation of hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval. We used The Cancer Genome Consortium and International Cancer Genome Consortium PDA data sets as validation cohorts. RESULTS: We validated the previously reported basal-like and classical tumor-specific subtypes of PDAs. We identified features of the PDA, including microenvironment gene expression patterns, that allowed tumors to be categorized into 5 subtypes, called pure basal like, stroma activated, desmoplastic, pure classical, and immune classical. These PDA subtypes have features of cancer cells and immune cells that could be targeted by pharmacologic agents. Tumor subtypes were associated with patient outcomes, based on analysis of our data set and the International Cancer Genome Consortium and The Cancer Genome Consortium PDA data sets. We also observed an exocrine signal associated with acinar cell contamination (from pancreatic tissue). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a classification system based on gene expression analysis of formalin-fixed PDA samples. We identified 5 PDA subtypes, based on features of cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. This system might be used to select therapies and predict patient outcomes. We found evidence that the previously reported exocrine-like (called ADEX) tumor subtype resulted from contamination with pancreatic acinar cells. ArrayExpress accession number: E-MTAB-6134.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Genomic studies have revealed subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) based on their molecular features, but different studies have reported different classification systems. It is a challenge to obtain high-quality, freshly frozen tissue for clinical analysis and determination of PDA subtypes. We aimed to redefine subtypes of PDA using a large number of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded PDA samples, which are more amenable to routine clinical evaluation. METHODS: We collected PDA samples from 309 consecutive patients who underwent surgery from September 1996 through December 2010 at 4 academic hospitals in Europe; nontumor tissue samples were not included. Samples were formalin fixed and paraffin embedded. DNA and RNA were isolated; gene expression, targeted DNA sequencing, and immunohistochemical analyses were performed. We used independent component analysis to deconvolute normal, tumor, and microenvironment transcriptome patterns in samples. We devised classification systems from an unsupervised analysis using a consensus clustering approach of our data set after removing normal contamination components. We associated subtypes with overall survival and disease-free survival of patients using Cox proportional hazards regression with estimation of hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval. We used The Cancer Genome Consortium and International Cancer Genome Consortium PDA data sets as validation cohorts. RESULTS: We validated the previously reported basal-like and classical tumor-specific subtypes of PDAs. We identified features of the PDA, including microenvironment gene expression patterns, that allowed tumors to be categorized into 5 subtypes, called pure basal like, stroma activated, desmoplastic, pure classical, and immune classical. These PDA subtypes have features of cancer cells and immune cells that could be targeted by pharmacologic agents. Tumor subtypes were associated with patient outcomes, based on analysis of our data set and the International Cancer Genome Consortium and The Cancer Genome Consortium PDA data sets. We also observed an exocrine signal associated with acinar cell contamination (from pancreatic tissue). CONCLUSIONS: We identified a classification system based on gene expression analysis of formalin-fixed PDA samples. We identified 5 PDA subtypes, based on features of cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment. This system might be used to select therapies and predict patient outcomes. We found evidence that the previously reported exocrine-like (called ADEX) tumor subtype resulted from contamination with pancreatic acinar cells. ArrayExpress accession number: E-MTAB-6134.
Authors: Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue; Jaeseung C Kim; Gavin W Wilson; Karen Ng; Eugenia Flores Figueroa; Grainne M O'Kane; Ashton A Connor; Robert E Denroche; Robert C Grant; Jessica McLeod; Julie M Wilson; Gun Ho Jang; Amy Zhang; Anna Dodd; Sheng-Ben Liang; Ayelet Borgida; Dianne Chadwick; Sangeetha Kalimuthu; Ilinca Lungu; John M S Bartlett; Paul M Krzyzanowski; Vandana Sandhu; Hervé Tiriac; Fieke E M Froeling; Joanna M Karasinska; James T Topham; Daniel J Renouf; David F Schaeffer; Steven J M Jones; Marco A Marra; Janessa Laskin; Runjan Chetty; Lincoln D Stein; George Zogopoulos; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Peter J Campbell; David A Tuveson; Jennifer J Knox; Sandra E Fischer; Steven Gallinger; Faiyaz Notta Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Alessandro Lugli; Inti Zlobec; Martin D Berger; Richard Kirsch; Iris D Nagtegaal Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Susanna Raho; Loredana Capobianco; Rocco Malivindi; Angelo Vozza; Carmela Piazzolla; Francesco De Leonardis; Ruggiero Gorgoglione; Pasquale Scarcia; Francesca Pezzuto; Gennaro Agrimi; Simona N Barile; Isabella Pisano; Stephan J Reshkin; Maria R Greco; Rosa A Cardone; Vittoria Rago; Yuan Li; Carlo M T Marobbio; Wolfgang Sommergruber; Christopher L Riley; Francesco M Lasorsa; Edward Mills; Maria C Vegliante; Giuseppe E De Benedetto; Deborah Fratantonio; Luigi Palmieri; Vincenza Dolce; Giuseppe Fiermonte Journal: Nat Metab Date: 2020-11-23
Authors: Honglin Jiang; Robert J Torphy; Katja Steiger; Henry Hongo; Alexa J Ritchie; Mark Kriegsmann; David Horst; Sarah E Umetsu; Nancy M Joseph; Kimberly McGregor; Michael J Pishvaian; Edik M Blais; Brian Lu; Mingyu Li; Michael Hollingsworth; Connor Stashko; Keith Volmar; Jen Jen Yeh; Valerie M Weaver; Zhen J Wang; Margaret A Tempero; Wilko Weichert; Eric A Collisson Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Naim U Rashid; Xianlu L Peng; Chong Jin; Richard A Moffitt; Keith E Volmar; Brian A Belt; Roheena Z Panni; Timothy M Nywening; Silvia G Herrera; Kristin J Moore; Sarah G Hennessey; Ashley B Morrison; Ryan Kawalerski; Apoorve Nayyar; Audrey E Chang; Benjamin Schmidt; Hong Jin Kim; David C Linehan; Jen Jen Yeh Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 12.531