| Literature DB >> 34526510 |
Maialen Stephens1, Karen López-Linares1,2, Javier Aldazabal3, Iratxe Macias4, Naiara Ortuzar5, Harkaitz Bengoetxea5, Susana Bulnes5, Natividad Alcorta-Sevillano4,5, Arantza Infante4, Jose Vicente Lafuente6, Clara I Rodríguez7.
Abstract
The development of new effective and safer therapies for osteoporosis, in addition to improved diagnostic and prevention strategies, represents a serious need in the scientific community. Micro-CT image-based analyses in association with biomechanical testing have become pivotal tools in identifying osteoporosis in animal models by assessment of bone microarchitecture and resistance, as well as bone strength. Here, we describe a dataset of micro-CT scans and reconstructions of 15 whole femurs and biomechanical tests on contralateral femurs from C57BL/6JOlaHsd ovariectomized (OVX), resembling human post-menopausal osteoporosis, and sham operated (sham) female mice. Data provided for each mouse include: the acquisition images (.tiff), the reconstructed images (.bmp) and an.xls file containing the maximum attenuations for each reconstructed image. Biomechanical data include an.xls file with the recorded load-displacement, a movie with the filmed test and an.xls file collecting all biomechanical results.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34526510 PMCID: PMC8443718 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-021-01012-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Data ISSN: 2052-4463 Impact factor: 6.444
Fig. 1Experimental workflow. Both femurs from C57BL/6JOlaHsd OVX and sham female mice were extracted from each animal; one femur was used for micro-CT measurements and the other for biomechanical testing.
Fig. 2Reconstructed images obtained from the scanning process. Example of the 3D reconstruction of the scan of femur “12 sham”, including sagittal, coronal and axial views at two different positions to show trabecular (top) and cortical (bottom) bone regions.
Fig. 3Experimental setup for 3-point bending biomechanical tests. The lower part corresponds to the fixed part of the apparatus. Two 2-millimeter stainless steel rolls are attached to the lower part. Distance between static roll centers is 8 mm. The bone lies on these two rolls. The moving part of the apparatus corresponds to the top roll. The force is measured on this part, as illustrated in the figure. The top 2-millimeter top roll is centered in the setup.
Biomechanical properties of sham and ovx femurs.
| Animal ID. | Max.Load | microCT Slice Number | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [N] | Left Roll | Load | Right Roll | |
| 01ov | 12.407 | 415 | 707 | 999 |
| 02ov | 10.866 | 334 | 626 | 918 |
| 03ov | 9.788 | 380 | 672 | 964 |
| 04ov | 14.001 | 405 | 697 | 989 |
| 05ov | 14.323 | 428 | 720 | 1012 |
| 06ov | 9.479 | 406 | 698 | 990 |
| 07ov | 14.172 | 394 | 686 | 978 |
| 08sham | 14.759 | 359 | 651 | 943 |
| 09sham | 15.251 | 419 | 711 | 1003 |
| 10sham | 15.139 | 414 | 706 | 999 |
| 11sham | 17.220 | 395 | 687 | 979 |
| 12sham | 14.437 | 396 | 687 | 980 |
| 13sham | 13.324 | 411 | 703 | 995 |
| 14sham | 14.902 | 399 | 691 | 983 |
| 15sham | 14.398 | 414 | 706 | 998 |
Results from biomechanical tests. The micro-CT slices corresponding to the position where the static rolls were placed and where the loads were applied are indicated in the last three columns.
| Measurement(s) | osteoporosis • biomechanical data |
| Technology Type(s) | micro-computed tomography • biomechanical testing |
| Factor Type(s) | osteoporosis |
| Sample Characteristic - Organism | Mus musculus |