Literature DB >> 18639658

Tissue modulus calculated from beam theory is biased by bone size and geometry: implications for the use of three-point bending tests to determine bone tissue modulus.

G Harry van Lenthe1, Romain Voide, Steven K Boyd, Ralph Müller.   

Abstract

Current practice to determine bone tissue modulus of murine cortical bone is to estimate it from three-point bending tests, using Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. However, murine femora are not perfect beams; hence, results can be inaccurate. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of beam theory, which we tested for two commonly used inbred strains of mice, C57BL/6 (B6) and C3H/He (C3H). We measured the three-dimensional structure of male and female B6 and C3H femora (N=20/group) by means of micro-computed tomography. For each femur five micro-finite element (micro-FE) models were created that simulated three-point bending tests with varying distances between the supports. Tissue modulus was calculated from beam theory using micro-FE results. The accuracy of beam theory was assessed by comparing the beam theory-derived moduli with the modulus as used in the micro-FE analyses. An additional set of fresh-frozen femora (10 B6 and 12 C3H) was biomechanically tested and subjected to the same micro-FE analyses. These combined experimental-computational analyses enabled an unbiased assessment of specimen-specific tissue modulus. We found that by using beam theory, tissue modulus was underestimated for all femora. Femoral geometry and size had strong effects on beam theory-derived tissue moduli. Owing to their relatively thin cortex, underestimation was markedly higher for B6 than for C3H. Underestimation was dependent on support width in a strain-specific manner. From our combined experimental-computational approach we calculated tissue moduli of 12.0+/-1.3 GPa and 13.4+/-2.1 GPa for B6 and C3H, respectively. We conclude that tissue moduli in murine femora are strongly underestimated when calculated from beam theory. Using image-based micro-FE analyses we could precisely quantify this underestimation. We showed that previously reported murine inbred strain-specific differences in tissue modulus are largely an effect of geometric differences, not accounted for by beam theory. We suggest a re-evaluation of the tissue properties obtained from three-point bending tests, especially in mouse genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18639658     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  22 in total

1.  Quantitative, structural, and image-based mechanical analysis of nonunion fracture repaired by genetically engineered mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Ilan Kallai; G Harry van Lenthe; Davide Ruffoni; Yoram Zilberman; Ralph Müller; Gadi Pelled; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Overexpression of DMP1 accelerates mineralization and alters cortical bone biomechanical properties in vivo.

Authors:  Ankush Bhatia; Michael Albazzaz; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nozomu Inoue; Lisa M Miller; Alvin Acerbo; Anne George; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2011-09-29

3.  Determination of Elastic Modulus in Mouse Bones Using a Nondestructive Micro-Indentation Technique Using Reference Point Indentation.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Multiscale investigation on the effects of additional weight bearing in combination with low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on bone quality of growing female rats.

Authors:  Tianlong Zhang; Jiazi Gao; Juan Fang; He Gong
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 5.  Establishing biomechanical mechanisms in mouse models: practical guidelines for systematically evaluating phenotypic changes in the diaphyses of long bones.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Matthew J Silva; Deepak Vashishth; X Edward Guo; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Adult Brtl/+ mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta demonstrates anabolic response to sclerostin antibody treatment with increased bone mass and strength.

Authors:  B P Sinder; L E White; J D Salemi; M S Ominsky; M S Caird; J C Marini; K M Kozloff
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Genetic regulation of bone strength: a review of animal model studies.

Authors:  Douglas J Adams; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-07-08

8.  Magnetic resonance elastography: Inversions in bounded media.

Authors:  Arunark Kolipaka; Kiaran P McGee; Armando Manduca; Anthony J Romano; Kevin J Glaser; Philip A Araoz; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  A finite element inverse analysis to assess functional improvement during the fracture healing process.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Froilán Granero-Moltó; Anna Spagnoli
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  An in-situ fluorescence-based optical extensometry system for imaging mechanically loaded bone.

Authors:  Christopher Price; Wen Li; John E Novotny; Liyun Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.