Literature DB >> 34523271

[Research on the classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures based on irreducibility or not].

Yifeng Zhao1, Fenghua Zhu1, Qinghua Chang2, Jiheng Liu3, Rui Zhang1, Fuqiang Song1, Fenglong Chu1, Qingshu Zai2, Wei Guo4, Xianwei Yang4, Qiang Shi5, Feng Zhang6, Haibin Wang1, Zhen Jiang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To formulate the classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures based on irreducibility or not in order to predict the difficulty of fracture recovery.
METHODS: A clinical data of 244 patients with closed femoral intertrochanteric fractures admitted between January 2017 and March 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 116 males and 128 females with an average age of 77.9 years (range, 45-100 years). The cause of injury included falling in 190 cases, traffic accident in 36 cases, smashing in 13 cases, and falling from height in 5 cases. The time from injury to operation was 1-14 days (mean, 3.6 days). According toAO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification, the fractures were classified as type 31-A1 in 38 cases, type 31-A2 in 160 cases, and type 31-A3 in 46 cases. According to whether the recovery difficulty occurred after intraoperative closed traction reset, the patients were divided into reducible-group and irreducible-group; combined with the literature and preoperative imaging data of two groups, the classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures was formulated based on the irreducibility or not. The 244 fractures were classified by the doctors who did not attend the operation according to the classification criteria, predicted the difficulty of fracture reduction, and compared with the actual intraoperative reduction situation.
RESULTS: The 244 patients were divided into reducible-group ( n=164, 67.21%) and irreducible-group ( n=80, 32.79%) according to the intraoperative difficulty of reduction. Comparing the imaging data and characteristics of the two groups, and formulating the classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures based on irreducibility or not, the fractures were mainly divided into two categories of irreducibility and reducibility. The fractures of irreducibility category was divided into typesⅠ-Ⅴ, among which type Ⅲ was divided into subtypes 1-4; the fractures of reducibility category was divided into typesⅠand Ⅱ. Compared with the actual intraoperative evaluation results, the total accuracy rate of the doctors who did not attend the operation was 81.15% (198/244) based on the classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures. The accuracy rate of irreducibility category was 65.74% (71/108), and the reducibility category was 93.38% (127/136). All patients were followed up 13-25 months, with an average of 17.6 months. All fractures healed except 2 cases died of infection.
CONCLUSION: The classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures based on irreducibility or not can accurately predict the reducible cases preoperatively, and most of the irreducible cases can be correctly predicted in a wider way. But the classification criteria still need to be further improved and supplemented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral intertrochanteric fracture; classification criteria; irreducible fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34523271      PMCID: PMC8444130          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202103233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  15 in total

1.  Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; B D Solberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-11

2.  Hook leverage technique for reduction of intertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Youngwoo Kim; Kunal Dheep; Jaeheon Lee; Yong-Cheol Yoon; Won-Yong Shon; Chang-Wug Oh; Jong-Keon Oh
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Proximal femoral nailing is superior to hemiarthroplasty in AO/OTA A2 and A3 intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Prasoon Kumar; Rajesh Kumar Rajnish; Siddhartha Sharma; Mandeep Singh Dhillon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Kadir Buyukdogan; Omur Caglar; Samet Isik; Mazhar Tokgozoglu; Bulent Atilla
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Pertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2) not amenable to closed reduction: causes of irreducibility.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Kiran kumar G N; Sanjay Yadav; Devendra Lakhotia; Ravijot Singh; Shivanand Gamanagatti; Vijay Sharma
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  The impact of cerclage cabling on unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a retrospective review of 465 patients.

Authors:  Paul Karayiannis; Andrew James
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  The effect on outcomes of the application of circumferential cerclage cable following intramedullary nailing in reverse intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ahmet Imerci; Nevres Hurriyet Aydogan; Kursad Tosun
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-12-06

8.  An irreducible variant of intertrochanteric fractures: a technique for open reduction.

Authors:  G Z Said; O Farouk; H G Z Said
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Risk factors for implant failure in reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).

Authors:  Youliang Hao; Zhishan Zhang; Fang Zhou; Hongquan Ji; Yun Tian; Yan Guo; Yang Lv; Zhongwei Yang; Guojin Hou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Predictors and reduction techniques for irreducible reverse intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  You-Liang Hao; Zhi-Shan Zhang; Fang Zhou; Hong-Quan Ji; Yun Tian; Yan Guo; Yang Lyu; Zhong-Wei Yang; Guo-Jin Hou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.