Literature DB >> 27889112

Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures.

Kadir Buyukdogan1, Omur Caglar2, Samet Isik2, Mazhar Tokgozoglu2, Bulent Atilla2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed factors associated with cut-out after internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures using double lag screw nails.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: A university hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with non-pathological intertrochanteric femur fractures and a minumum 90days follow-up who underwent internal fixation with dual lag screw nails were included. Potential risk factors for lag screw cut-out investigated by our study were: age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification), type of fracture (AO/OTA classification), fracture stability, side, operation time, implant length, reduction quality, tip-apex distance (TAD), and lag screw configuration. Logistic regression was used to investigate potential predictors of screw cut-out.
RESULTS: Eighty-five of the 118 patients with hip fractures treated between February 2010 and November 2013 at our institution met the inclusion criteria for the study. Fifty-eight patients were female (68.2%), mean age was 77.4 (range: 50-95 years), mean follow up was 380days (range: 150days-2.5 years), and cut of was observed in 9 patients (10.5%). The following variables identified through univariate analysis with p<0.2 were included in multivariant logistic regression model: age, side, reduction quality, implant length, TAD and ASA score. Only TAD (p=0.003) was found to be significant in the multivariant model.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that risk factors for cut-out with single-lag screw devices are also applicable to dual-lag screw implants. We found that TAD was a significant factor for cut-out in dual-lag screw implants. Thus, screw cut-out can be minimized by optimizing screw position.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cut-out; Intertrochanteric fractures; Logistic regression; Prognostic level II; Risk factors; Tip-apex distance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27889112     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors for cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail of double proximal screw design.

Authors:  Ali Şişman; Özgür Avci; Serdar Kamil Çepni; Suat Batar; Ömer Polat
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-03-17

2.  [Research on the classification criteria of femoral intertrochanteric fractures based on irreducibility or not].

Authors:  Yifeng Zhao; Fenghua Zhu; Qinghua Chang; Jiheng Liu; Rui Zhang; Fuqiang Song; Fenglong Chu; Qingshu Zai; Wei Guo; Xianwei Yang; Qiang Shi; Feng Zhang; Haibin Wang; Zhen Jiang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 3.  Cement augmentation for trochanteric fracture in elderly: A systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Stramazzo; Salvatore Ratano; Francesco Monachino; Davide Pavan; Giuseppe Rovere; Lawrence Camarda
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-20

4.  Comparison of Baumgaertner and Chang reduction quality criteria for the assessment of trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Wei Mao; Haofei Ni; Linli Li; Yiqun He; Xujun Chen; Han Tang; Youhai Dong
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Risk factors for implant failure in reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA).

Authors:  Youliang Hao; Zhishan Zhang; Fang Zhou; Hongquan Ji; Yun Tian; Yan Guo; Yang Lv; Zhongwei Yang; Guojin Hou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.

Authors:  Gaetano Caruso; Nicola Corradi; Antonio Caldaria; Daniele Bottin; Dario Lo Re; Vincenzo Lorusso; Chiara Morotti; Giorgia Valpiani; Leo Massari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Femur Bionic Nail (PFBN) Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation and InterTan in Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Yanhua Wang; Wei Chen; Lijia Zhang; Chen Xiong; Xiaomeng Zhang; Kai Yu; Jiabao Ju; Xiaofeng Chen; Dianying Zhang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Association between Immediate Postoperative Radiographic Findings and Failed Internal Fixation for Trochanteric Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Norio Yamamoto; Yasushi Tsujimoto; Suguru Yokoo; Koji Demiya; Madoka Inoue; Tomoyuki Noda; Toshifumi Ozaki; Takashi Yorifuji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Predictors and reduction techniques for irreducible reverse intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  You-Liang Hao; Zhi-Shan Zhang; Fang Zhou; Hong-Quan Ji; Yun Tian; Yan Guo; Yang Lyu; Zhong-Wei Yang; Guo-Jin Hou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.