Literature DB >> 34520680

Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in animals.

Tim Janicke1,2, Salomé Fromonteil1.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is often considered as a critical evolutionary force promoting sexual size dimorphism (SSD) in animals. However, empirical evidence for a positive relationship between sexual selection on males and male-biased SSD received mixed support depending on the studied taxonomic group and on the method used to quantify sexual selection. Here, we present a meta-analytic approach accounting for phylogenetic non-independence to test how standardized metrics of the opportunity and strength of pre-copulatory sexual selection relate to SSD across a broad range of animal taxa comprising up to 95 effect sizes from 59 species. We found that SSD based on length measurements was correlated with the sex difference in the opportunity for sexual selection but showed a weak and statistically non-significant relationship with the sex difference in the Bateman gradient. These findings suggest that pre-copulatory sexual selection plays a limited role for the evolution of SSD in a broad phylogenetic context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bateman gradient; body size; body weight; opportunity for selection; sexual selection; sexual size dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34520680      PMCID: PMC8440037          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.812


  19 in total

Review 1.  A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  J E Lovich; J W Gibbons
Journal:  Growth Dev Aging       Date:  1992

Review 2.  On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection.

Authors:  Adam G Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards.

Authors:  Robert M Cox; Stephanie L Skelly; Henry B John-Alder
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sexual selection.

Authors:  M Andersson; Y Iwasa
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  A global analysis of song frequency in passerines provides no support for the acoustic adaptation hypothesis but suggests a role for sexual selection.

Authors:  Peter Mikula; Mihai Valcu; Henrik Brumm; Martin Bulla; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Tereza Petrusková; Bart Kempenaers; Tomáš Albrecht
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  TimeTree: A Resource for Timelines, Timetrees, and Divergence Times.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Suleski; S Blair Hedges
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Edward H Morrow
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms.

Authors:  Sudhir Kumar; Glen Stecher; Michael Li; Christina Knyaz; Koichiro Tamura
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Mollie K Manier; Nalini Puniamoorthy; Christopher Schoff; William T Starmer; Shannon H Buckley Luepold; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.

Authors:  Judit Mokos; István Scheuring; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Substantial but Misunderstood Human Sexual Dimorphism Results Mainly From Sexual Selection on Males and Natural Selection on Females.

Authors:  William D Lassek; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 3.  Sex-specific inbreeding depression: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Regina Vega-Trejo; Raïssa A de Boer; John L Fitzpatrick; Alexander Kotrschal
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 11.274

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.