Literature DB >> 1487365

A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism.

J E Lovich1, J W Gibbons.   

Abstract

Previous studies of sexual size dimorphism (SSD) use a variety of size dimorphism indices (SDI's) to quantify SSD. We propose that a useful SDI should meet four criteria as follows; 1) it should be properly scaled, 2) it should have high intuitive value, 3) it should produce values with one sign, (positive) when sex A is larger than sex B, and the opposite sign when sex B is larger, and 4) it should produce values that are symmetric around a central value, preferably zero. Many previously published SDI's do not meet any of these criteria, and none meet more than three. We present an alternative SDI based on the mean size of the larger sex divided by the mean size of the smaller sex with the result arbitrarily defined as positive (minus one) when females are larger and negative (plus one) in the converse case. Careful selection of a primary size variable is crucial to meaningful interpretation of sexual size differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1487365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Growth Dev Aging        ISSN: 1041-1232


  71 in total

1.  Genetic linkage map of a wild genome: genomic structure, recombination and sexual dimorphism in bighorn sheep.

Authors:  Jocelyn Poissant; John T Hogg; Corey S Davis; Joshua M Miller; Jillian F Maddox; David W Coltman
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.969

2.  Genetic basis of sexual dimorphism in the threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Authors:  T Leinonen; J M Cano; J Merilä
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Adult sex ratio, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection in a Mesozoic reptile.

Authors:  Ryosuke Motani; Da-yong Jiang; Olivier Rieppel; Yi-fan Xue; Andrea Tintori
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Equal temperature-size responses of the sexes are widespread within arthropod species.

Authors:  Andrew G Hirst; Curtis R Horne; David Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Environmental effects on sexual size dimorphism of a seed-feeding beetle.

Authors:  R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sexual conflict and the gender load: correlated evolution between population fitness and sexual dimorphism in seed beetles.

Authors:  Göran Arnqvist; Midori Tuda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism in bill size and shape of hermit hummingbirds (Phaethornithinae): a role for ecological causation.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; Jill S Miller; Joanna L Rifkin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Behavioural display systems across nine Anolis lizard species: sexual dimorphisms in structure and function.

Authors:  Michele A Johnson; Juli Wade
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Strong support for Rensch's rule in an American clade of lizards (Teiidae and Gymnophtalmidae) and a paradox of the largest tejus.

Authors:  Petra Frýdlová; Daniel Frynta
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-04-16

10.  Introducing the refined gravity hypothesis of extreme sexual size dimorphism.

Authors:  Guadalupe Corcobado; Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés; Eva De Mas; Jordi Moya-Laraño
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.