Literature DB >> 27225128

How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation.

Stefan Lüpold1,2, Mollie K Manier1,3, Nalini Puniamoorthy1,4, Christopher Schoff1, William T Starmer1, Shannon H Buckley Luepold1, John M Belote1, Scott Pitnick1.   

Abstract

Post-copulatory sexual selection (PSS), fuelled by female promiscuity, is credited with the rapid evolution of sperm quality traits across diverse taxa. Yet, our understanding of the adaptive significance of sperm ornaments and the cryptic female preferences driving their evolution is extremely limited. Here we review the evolutionary allometry of exaggerated sexual traits (for example, antlers, horns, tail feathers, mandibles and dewlaps), show that the giant sperm of some Drosophila species are possibly the most extreme ornaments in all of nature and demonstrate how their existence challenges theories explaining the intensity of sexual selection, mating-system evolution and the fundamental nature of sex differences. We also combine quantitative genetic analyses of interacting sex-specific traits in D. melanogaster with comparative analyses of the condition dependence of male and female reproductive potential across species with varying ornament size to reveal complex dynamics that may underlie sperm-length evolution. Our results suggest that producing few gigantic sperm evolved by (1) Fisherian runaway selection mediated by genetic correlations between sperm length, the female preference for long sperm and female mating frequency, and (2) longer sperm increasing the indirect benefits to females. Our results also suggest that the developmental integration of sperm quality and quantity renders post-copulatory sexual selection on ejaculates unlikely to treat male-male competition and female choice as discrete processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27225128     DOI: 10.1038/nature18005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  36 in total

1.  Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mollie K Manier; John M Belote; Kirstin S Berben; David Novikov; Will T Stuart; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes.

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Douglas J Emlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids.

Authors:  Jakob Bro-Jørgensen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The phylogeny of Cetartiodactyla: the importance of dense taxon sampling, missing data, and the remarkable promise of cytochrome b to provide reliable species-level phylogenies.

Authors:  Ingi Agnarsson; Laura J May-Collado
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Differential effects of genetic vs. environmental quality in Drosophila melanogaster suggest multiple forms of condition dependence.

Authors:  Russell Bonduriansky; Martin A Mallet; Devin Arbuthnott; Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn; Juan José Egozcue; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  A mechanism of extreme growth and reliable signaling in sexually selected ornaments and weapons.

Authors:  Douglas J Emlen; Ian A Warren; Annika Johns; Ian Dworkin; Laura Corley Lavine
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The allometry between secondary sexual traits and body size is nonlinear among cervids.

Authors:  J F Lemaître; C Vanpé; F Plard; J M Gaillard
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Genetic heterogeneity among the founders of laboratory populations of Drosophila. I. Scutellar chaetae.

Authors:  P A Parsons; S M Hosgood
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Quadratic analyses of reciprocal crosses.

Authors:  C C Cockerham; B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Large-male advantages associated with costs of sperm production in Drosophila hydei, a species with giant sperm.

Authors:  S Pitnick; T A Markow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  32 in total

1.  A Splice Variant of Centrosomin Converts Mitochondria to Microtubule-Organizing Centers.

Authors:  Jieyan V Chen; Rebecca A Buchwalter; Ling-Rong Kao; Timothy L Megraw
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Epigenetic paternal effects as costly, condition-dependent traits.

Authors:  Erin L Macartney; Angela J Crean; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Evolution: The bigger, the better.

Authors:  Jennifer R Gardiner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  What do isogamous organisms teach us about sex and the two sexes?

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen; Hanna Kokko; Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  How sperm competition shapes the evolution of testes and sperm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Raïssa A de Boer; Jonathan P Evans; Joseph L Tomkins; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Temporal dynamics of competitive fertilization in social groups of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) shed new light on avian sperm competition.

Authors:  Rômulo Carleial; Grant C McDonald; Lewis G Spurgin; Eleanor A Fairfield; Yunke Wang; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Post-ejaculatory modifications to sperm (PEMS).

Authors:  Scott Pitnick; Mariana F Wolfner; Steve Dorus
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2019-11-18

Review 9.  Spermatogenesis and the Evolution of Mammalian Sex Chromosomes.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Emily E K Kopania; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Can Sexual Selection Drive the Evolution of Sperm Cell Structure?

Authors:  Leigh W Simmons; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.