Literature DB >> 10739314

Heritable variation for latent inhibition and its correlation with reversal learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera).

S B Chandra1, J S Hosler, B H Smith.   

Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI) in honeybees (Apis mellifera) was studied by using a proboscis extension response conditioning procedure. Individual queens, drones, and workers differed in the degree to which they revealed LI. The authors hypothesized that individual differences would have a substantial genetic basis. Two sets of progeny were established by crossing virgin queens and individual drones, both of which had been selected for differential expression of inhibition. LI was stronger in the progeny from the queens and drones that had shown greater inhibition. The expression of LI was also dependent on environmental factors that are most likely associated with age, foraging experience outside of the colony, or both. Furthermore, there was a correlated response in the speed at which progeny reversed a learned discrimination of 2 odors. These genetic analyses may reveal underlying mechanisms that these 2 learning paradigms have in common.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10739314     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.86

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  27 in total

1.  Learning modulates the ensemble representations for odors in primary olfactory networks.

Authors:  Kevin C Daly; Thomas A Christensen; Hong Lei; Brian H Smith; John G Hildebrand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Flexibility in assessment of prey cues: frog-eating bats and frog calls.

Authors:  Rachel A Page; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sensory responsiveness and the effects of equal subjective rewards on tactile learning and memory of honeybees.

Authors:  Ricarda Scheiner; Anthea Kuritz-Kaiser; Randolf Menzel; Joachim Erber
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Individual learning phenotypes drive collective behavior.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Natalie J Lemanski; Thiago Mosqueiro; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ability of honeybee, Apis mellifera, to detect and discriminate odors of varieties of canola (Brassica rapa and Brassica napus) and snapdragon flowers (Antirrhinum majus).

Authors:  Geraldine A Wright; Bethany D Skinner; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Social learning of floral odours inside the honeybee hive.

Authors:  Walter M Farina; Christoph Grüter; Paula C Díaz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.

Authors:  Chelsea N Cook; Thiago Mosqueiro; Colin S Brent; Cahit Ozturk; Jürgen Gadau; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Brian H Smith
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Multiple reversal olfactory learning in honeybees.

Authors:  Theo Mota; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Successive olfactory reversal learning in honeybees.

Authors:  Bernhard Komischke; Martin Giurfa; Harald Lachnit; Dagmar Malun
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Associative learning during early adulthood enhances later memory retention in honeybees.

Authors:  Andrés Arenas; Vanesa M Fernández; Walter M Farina
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.