Margaret A French1, Matthew L Cohen, Ryan T Pohlig, Darcy S Reisman. 1. Departments of Physical Therapy (M.A.F., D.S.R.) and Communication Sciences and Disorders (M.L.C.), University of Delaware, Newark; Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark (M.A.F., D.S.R.); and College of Health Sciences Biostatistics Core Facility, University of Delaware, Newark (R.T.P.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ability to switch between walking patterns (ie, locomotor switching) is vital for successful community navigation and may be impacted by poststroke impairments. Thus, the purpose of this work was to examine locomotor switching and the relationship between locomotor switching and fluid cognition in individuals after stroke compared with neurotypical adults. METHODS: Twenty-nine individuals more than 6 months after stroke and 18 neurotypical adults participated in a 2-day study. On day 1, participants were taught a new walking pattern on the treadmill and then locomotor switching was assessed by instructing participants to switch between the new walking pattern and their usual walking pattern. The change between these 2 patterns was calculated as the switching index. On day 2, the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery was administered to obtain the Fluid Cognition Composite Score (FCCS), which reflected fluid cognition. The switching index was compared between groups using an analysis of covariance, and the relationship between locomotor switching and fluid cognition was assessed with regression. RESULTS: Individuals after stroke had significantly lower switching indexes compared with neurotypical adults (P = 0.03). The regression showed a significant interaction between group and FCCS (P = 0.002), with the FCCS predicting the switching index in neurotypical adults but not in individuals after stroke. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Individuals after stroke appear to have deficits in locomotor switching compared with neurotypical adults. The relationship between fluid cognition and locomotor switching was significant in neurotypical adults but not in individuals after stroke. Future work to understand the relationship between specific cognitive domains and locomotor switching is needed (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A361).
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The ability to switch between walking patterns (ie, locomotor switching) is vital for successful community navigation and may be impacted by poststroke impairments. Thus, the purpose of this work was to examine locomotor switching and the relationship between locomotor switching and fluid cognition in individuals after stroke compared with neurotypical adults. METHODS: Twenty-nine individuals more than 6 months after stroke and 18 neurotypical adults participated in a 2-day study. On day 1, participants were taught a new walking pattern on the treadmill and then locomotor switching was assessed by instructing participants to switch between the new walking pattern and their usual walking pattern. The change between these 2 patterns was calculated as the switching index. On day 2, the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery was administered to obtain the Fluid Cognition Composite Score (FCCS), which reflected fluid cognition. The switching index was compared between groups using an analysis of covariance, and the relationship between locomotor switching and fluid cognition was assessed with regression. RESULTS: Individuals after stroke had significantly lower switching indexes compared with neurotypical adults (P = 0.03). The regression showed a significant interaction between group and FCCS (P = 0.002), with the FCCS predicting the switching index in neurotypical adults but not in individuals after stroke. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Individuals after stroke appear to have deficits in locomotor switching compared with neurotypical adults. The relationship between fluid cognition and locomotor switching was significant in neurotypical adults but not in individuals after stroke. Future work to understand the relationship between specific cognitive domains and locomotor switching is needed (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A361).
Authors: Daina L Sturnieks; Jasmine Menant; Jos Vanrenterghem; Kim Delbaere; Richard C Fitzpatrick; Stephen R Lord Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: Mariëlle W van Ooijen; Anita Heeren; Katrijn Smulders; Alexander C H Geurts; Thomas W J Janssen; Peter J Beek; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Melvyn Roerdink Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Dan Mungas; Robert Heaton; David Tulsky; Philip David Zelazo; Jerry Slotkin; David Blitz; Jin-Shei Lai; Richard Gershon Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Robert K Heaton; Natacha Akshoomoff; David Tulsky; Dan Mungas; Sandra Weintraub; Sureyya Dikmen; Jennifer Beaumont; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Kevin Conway; Jerry Slotkin; Richard Gershon Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Maria Joana D Caetano; Jasmine C Menant; Daniel Schoene; Paulo H S Pelicioni; Daina L Sturnieks; Stephen R Lord Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 6.053