Literature DB >> 24960474

Factor structure, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in adults.

Dan Mungas1, Robert Heaton2, David Tulsky3, Philip David Zelazo4, Jerry Slotkin5, David Blitz5, Jin-Shei Lai5, Richard Gershon5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the construct validity of the NIH Neurobehavioral Toolbox Cognitive Health Battery (NIHTB-CHB) in adults. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the dimensional structure underlying the NIHTB-CHB and Gold Standard tests chosen to serve as concurrent validity criteria for the NIHTB-CHB. These results were used to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the NIHTB-CHB in adults ranging from 20 to 85 years of age. Five dimensions were found to explain the correlations among NIHTB-CHB and Gold Standard tests: Vocabulary, Reading, Episodic Memory, Working Memory and Executive Function/Processing Speed. NIHTB-CHB measures and their Gold Standard analogues defined factors in a pattern that broadly supported the convergent and discriminant validity of the NIHTB-CHB tests. This 5-factor structure was found to be invariant across 20-60 year old (N=159) and 65-85 year old (N=109) age groups that were included in the current validity study. Second order Crystallized Abilities (Vocabulary and Reading) and Fluid Abilities (Episodic Memory, Working Memory, Executive/Speed) factors parsimoniously explained correlations among the five first order factors. These results suggest that the NIHTB-CHB will provide both fine-grained and broad characterization of cognition across the adult age span.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24960474      PMCID: PMC4103956          DOI: 10.1017/S1355617714000307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  11 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Processing speed and executive functions in cognitive aging: how to disentangle their mutual relationship?

Authors:  Cédric T Albinet; Geoffroy Boucard; Cédric A Bouquet; Michel Audiffren
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  The role of factor analysis in construct validity: is it a myth?

Authors:  Stephen C Bowden
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Relations between cognitive abilities and measures of executive functioning.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function.

Authors:  Richard C Gershon; Molly V Wagster; Hugh C Hendrie; Nathan A Fox; Karon F Cook; Cindy J Nowinski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models.

Authors:  P M Bentler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  VII. NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): factor structure for 3 to 15 year olds.

Authors:  Dan Mungas; Keith Widaman; Philip David Zelazo; David Tulsky; Robert K Heaton; Jerry Slotkin; David L Blitz; Richard C Gershon
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  2013-08

8.  Measurement invariance of neuropsychological tests in diverse older persons.

Authors:  Dan Mungas; Keith F Widaman; Bruce R Reed; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Composite scores for executive function items: demographic heterogeneity and relationships with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Paul K Crane; Kaavya Narasimhalu; Laura E Gibbons; Otto Pedraza; Kala M Mehta; Yuxiao Tang; Jennifer J Manly; Bruce R Reed; Dan M Mungas
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.892

10.  The myth of testing construct validity using factor analysis or correlations with normal or mixed clinical populations: lessons from memory assessment.

Authors:  Dean C Delis; Mark Jacobson; Mark W Bondi; Joanne M Hamilton; David P Salmon
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.892

View more
  22 in total

1.  Early childhood depression, emotion regulation, episodic memory, and hippocampal development.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Michael P Harms; Rebecca Tillman; Elizabeth Hawkey; Joan L Luby
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2019-01

2.  Psychometric Properties of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in Healthy Older Adults: Reliability, Validity, and Agreement with Standard Neuropsychological Tests.

Authors:  Emmi P Scott; Anne Sorrell; Andreana Benitez
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Reliability and validity of composite scores from the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in adults.

Authors:  Robert K Heaton; Natacha Akshoomoff; David Tulsky; Dan Mungas; Sandra Weintraub; Sureyya Dikmen; Jennifer Beaumont; Kaitlin B Casaletto; Kevin Conway; Jerry Slotkin; Richard Gershon
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Measuring episodic memory across the lifespan: NIH Toolbox Picture Sequence Memory Test.

Authors:  Sureyya S Dikmen; Patricia J Bauer; Sandra Weintraub; Dan Mungas; Jerry Slotkin; Jennifer L Beaumont; Richard Gershon; Nancy R Temkin; Robert K Heaton
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.892

5.  Latent Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in an Alzheimer's Disease Research Sample.

Authors:  Yue Ma; Cynthia M Carlsson; Michelle L Wahoske; Hanna M Blazel; Richard J Chappell; Sterling C Johnson; Sanjay Asthana; Carey E Gleason
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Interpreting Patterns of Low Scores on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.

Authors:  James A Holdnack; David S Tulsky; Brian L Brooks; Jerry Slotkin; Richard Gershon; Allen W Heinemann; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.813

7.  Fluid Cognitive Abilities Are Important for Learning and Retention of a New, Explicitly Learned Walking Pattern in Individuals After Stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Matthew L Cohen; Ryan T Pohlig; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Distinct functional and structural connections predict crystallised and fluid cognition in healthy adults.

Authors:  Elvisha Dhamala; Keith W Jamison; Abhishek Jaywant; Sarah Dennis; Amy Kuceyeski
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Fluid Cognition Relates to Locomotor Switching in Neurotypical Adults, Not Individuals After Stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Matthew L Cohen; Ryan T Pohlig; Darcy S Reisman
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.649

10.  Utility of the iPad NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery in a clinical trial of older adults.

Authors:  Carolyn M Parsey; Justina E Bagger; Emily H Trittschuh; Angela J Hanson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.