Literature DB >> 34505192

Safety and efficacy of minimalist transcatheter aortic valve implantation using a new-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves.

Jonathan M Michel1,2, Antonio H Frangieh1,3, Daniele Giacoppo1,4,5,6, Hector A Alvarez-Covarrubias1,7, Costanza Pellegrini1, Tobias Rheude1, Oliver Deutsch1, N Patrick Mayr1, P Moritz Rumpf1,2, Barbara E Stähli2, Adnan Kastrati1,8, Heribert Schunkert1,8, Erion Xhepa1, Michael Joner1,8, A Markus Kasel9,10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bicuspid aortic valve may be associated with increased complications during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). AIMS: Compare balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) safety and efficacy in severe tricuspid (TAV) and bicuspid (BAV) aortic stenosis.
METHODS: Transfemoral TAVI was performed in 743 patients (Jan 2014-June 2019) using the SAPIEN 3 THV. Aortic valve morphology was determined using computed tomography. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) derived safety and efficacy endpoints at 1 year were evaluated.
RESULTS: BAV patients (n = 78), were younger (77 [72, 81] vs. 81 [78, 85] years, p < 0.001) with lower surgical risk (EuroSCORE II 2.96% vs. 4.51% p < 0.001). Bicuspid valves were more calcified (BAV 1308mm3, TAV 848mm3 p < 0.001) with more asymmetric calcification (BAV 63/78 (81%), TAV 239/665 (36%), p < 0.001). Device success (BAV 94%, TAV 90%, p = 0.45) and major vascular complications (BAV 6%, TAV 9%, p = 0.66) were comparable. At 1 year, there was a trend toward lower combined all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for congestive heart failure in BAV patients (BAV 7%, TAV 13%, p = 0.08) with significantly lower all-cause mortality in this cohort (BAV 1%, TAV 9%, p = 0.020). VARC-2 time-related valve safety (BAV 22%, TAV 20%, p = 0.60) was comparable; however, bioprosthetic valve thrombosis remained more common in BAV patients (BAV 7%, TAV 2%, p = 0.010, Hazard ratio 3.57 [95% confidence interval 1.26, 10.10]). After propensity score matching, only bioprosthetic valve thrombosis remained significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS: Safety and efficacy of the SAPIEN 3 balloon-expandable THV in BAV is comparable with TAV. Higher rates of bioprosthetic valve thrombosis require further investigation.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Balloon-expandable; Bicuspid; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Tricuspid

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34505192     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-021-01935-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol        ISSN: 1861-0684            Impact factor:   5.460


  40 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Frequency by decades of unicuspid, bicuspid, and tricuspid aortic valves in adults having isolated aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis, with or without associated aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  William C Roberts; Jong M Ko
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Contrasting histoarchitecture of calcified leaflets from stenotic bicuspid versus stenotic tricuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  J M Isner; S K Chokshi; A DeFranco; J Braimen; G A Slovenkai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Samuel C Siu; Candice K Silversides
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  The natural history of aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  D Horstkotte; F Loogen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Aortic annulus and root characteristics in severe aortic stenosis due to bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valves: implications for transcatheter aortic valve therapies.

Authors:  Femi Philip; Nadine Nadar Faza; Paul Schoenhagen; Milind Y Desai; E Murat Tuzcu; Lars G Svensson; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases.

Authors:  H Y Sabet; W D Edwards; H D Tazelaar; R C Daly
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Sung-Han Yoon; Won-Keun Kim; Abhijeet Dhoble; Stephan Milhorini Pio; Vasilis Babaliaros; Hasan Jilaihawi; Thomas Pilgrim; Ole De Backer; Sabine Bleiziffer; Flavien Vincent; Tobias Shmidt; Christian Butter; Norihiko Kamioka; Lena Eschenbach; Matthias Renker; Masahiko Asami; Mohamad Lazkani; Buntaro Fujita; Antoinette Birs; Marco Barbanti; Ashish Pershad; Uri Landes; Brad Oldemeyer; Mitusnobu Kitamura; Luke Oakley; Tomoki Ochiai; Tarun Chakravarty; Mamoo Nakamura; Philip Ruile; Florian Deuschl; Daniel Berman; Thomas Modine; Stephan Ensminger; Ran Kornowski; Rudiger Lange; James M McCabe; Mathew R Williams; Brian Whisenant; Victoria Delgado; Stephan Windecker; Eric Van Belle; Lars Sondergaard; Bernard Chevalier; Michael Mack; Jeroen J Bax; Martin B Leon; Raj R Makkar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy.

Authors:  Riti Mahadevia; Alex J Barker; Susanne Schnell; Pegah Entezari; Preeti Kansal; Paul W M Fedak; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick McCarthy; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  The incidence of congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Julien I E Hoffman; Samuel Kaplan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.