Literature DB >> 24345403

Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy.

Riti Mahadevia1, Alex J Barker, Susanne Schnell, Pegah Entezari, Preeti Kansal, Paul W M Fedak, S Chris Malaisrie, Patrick McCarthy, Jeremy Collins, James Carr, Michael Markl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic 3-dimensional blood flow was analyzed to investigate altered ascending aorta (AAo) hemodynamics in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients and its association with differences in cusp fusion patterns (right-left, RL versus right-noncoronary, RN) and expression of aortopathy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Four-dimensional flow MRI measured in vivo 3-dimensional blood flow in the aorta of 75 subjects: BAV patients with aortic dilatation stratified by leaflet fusion pattern (n=15 RL-BAV, mid AAo diameter=39.9±4.4 mm; n=15 RN-BAV, 39.6±7.2 mm); aorta size controls with tricuspid aortic valves (n=30, 41.0±4.4 mm); healthy volunteers (n=15, 24.9±3.0 mm). Aortopathy type (0-3), systolic flow angle, flow displacement, and regional wall shear stress were determined for all subjects. Eccentric outflow jet patterns in BAV patients resulted in elevated regional wall shear stress (P<0.0125) at the right-anterior walls for RL-BAV and right-posterior walls for RN-BAV in comparison with aorta size controls. Dilatation of the aortic root only (type 1) or involving the entire AAo and arch (type 3) was found in the majority of RN-BAV patients (87%) but was mostly absent for RL-BAV patients (87% type 2). Differences in aortopathy type between RL-BAV and RN-BAV patients were associated with altered flow displacement in the proximal and mid AAo for type 1 (42%-81% decrease versus type 2) and distal AAo for type 3 (33%-39% increase versus type 2).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence and type of BAV fusion was associated with changes in regional wall shear stress distribution, systolic flow eccentricity, and expression of BAV aortopathy. Hemodynamic markers suggest a physiological mechanism by which the valve morphology phenotype can influence phenotypes of BAV aortopathy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic diseases; bicuspid aortic valve; hemodynamics; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24345403      PMCID: PMC3946057          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  30 in total

1.  MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions.

Authors:  Panorea Papathanasopoulou; Shunzhi Zhao; Uwe Köhler; Malcolm B Robertson; Quan Long; Peter Hoskins; X Yun Xu; Ian Marshall
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Restricted cusp motion in right-left type of bicuspid aortic valves: a new risk marker for aortopathy.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Ciro Bancone; Carlo A Conti; Emiliano Votta; Alberto Redaelli; Luca Del Viscovo; Maurizio Cotrufo
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Wall shear stress and flow patterns in the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valves differ significantly from tricuspid aortic valves: a prospective study.

Authors:  Christian Meierhofer; Eike Philipp Schneider; Christine Lyko; Andrea Hutter; Stefan Martinoff; Michael Markl; Alfred Hager; John Hess; Heiko Stern; Sohrab Fratz
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Imaging biomarkers of aortic disease: increased growth rates with eccentric systolic flow.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Jarrett Wrenn; Monica Sigovan; Elyse Foster; Elaine E Tseng; David Saloner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Is aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve disease a congenital defect or a result of abnormal hemodynamics? A critical reappraisal of a one-sided argument.

Authors:  Evaldas Girdauskas; Michael A Borger; Maria-Anna Secknus; Gracijus Girdauskas; Thomas Kuntze
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Comparison of four-dimensional flow parameters for quantification of flow eccentricity in the ascending aorta.

Authors:  Monica Sigovan; Michael D Hope; Petter Dyverfeldt; David Saloner
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns.

Authors:  Michael D Hope; Thomas A Hope; Alison K Meadows; Karen G Ordovas; Thomas H Urbania; Marcus T Alley; Charles B Higgins
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Knowledge, attitudes, and practice patterns in surgical management of bicuspid aortopathy: a survey of 100 cardiac surgeons.

Authors:  Subodh Verma; Bobby Yanagawa; Sameer Kalra; Marc Ruel; Mark D Peterson; Michael H Yamashita; Andrew Fagan; Maria E Currie; Christopher W White; Stephane Leung Wai Sang; Cristian Rosu; Steve Singh; Holly Mewhort; Nandini Gupta; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Evaluation of 3D blood flow patterns and wall shear stress in the normal and dilated thoracic aorta using flow-sensitive 4D CMR.

Authors:  Jonas Bürk; Philipp Blanke; Zoran Stankovic; Alex Barker; Maximilian Russe; Julia Geiger; Alex Frydrychowicz; Mathias Langer; Michael Markl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Bicuspid aortic valve disease: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ify Mordi; Nikolaos Tzemos
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 1.866

View more
  114 in total

1.  Response to letter regarding article, "Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy".

Authors:  Riti Mahadevia; Alex J Barker; Susanne Schnell; Pegah Entezari; Preeti Kansal; Paul W M Fedak; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick McCarthy; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging-based characterization of aortic morphometry and haemodynamics: impact of age, aortic diameter, and valve morphology.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Ian Murphy; Kelly Jarvis; Susanne Schnell; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; S Chris Malaisrie; Michael Markl
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics does not promote remodeling in porcine aortic wall concavity.

Authors:  Samantha K Atkins; Alison N Moore; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

4.  Aortic shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve with stenosis and insufficiency.

Authors:  Yan Shan; Jun Li; Yongshi Wang; Boting Wu; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Chunsheng Wang; Xiaolin Wang; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Aortic 4D flow MRI in 2 minutes using compressed sensing, respiratory controlled adaptive k-space reordering, and inline reconstruction.

Authors:  Liliana E Ma; Michael Markl; Kelvin Chow; Hyungkyu Huh; Christoph Forman; Alireza Vali; Andreas Greiser; James Carr; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker; Ning Jin
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Evaluation of Aortic Blood Flow and Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Stenosis and Its Association With Left Ventricular Remodeling.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Achudhan Karunaharamoorthy; Ralf Felix Trauzeddel; Alex J Barker; Edyta Blaszczyk; Michael Markl; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Aortic stenosis exacerbates flow aberrations related to the bicuspid aortic valve fusion pattern and the aortopathy phenotype.

Authors:  Yan Shan; Jun Li; Yongshi Wang; Boting Wu; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Chunsheng Wang; Xiaolin Wang; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Able to Improve Hemodynamic Outcome?

Authors:  Pavlo Yevtushenko; Florian Hellmeier; Jan Bruening; Sarah Nordmeyer; Volkmar Falk; Christoph Knosalla; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Leonid Goubergrits
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Thoracic aorta 3D hemodynamics in pediatric and young adult patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Bradley D Allen; Pim van Ooij; Alex J Barker; Maria Carr; Maya Gabbour; Susanne Schnell; Kelly B Jarvis; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Cynthia Rigsby; Joshua D Robinson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Bicuspid valve-related aortic disease: flow assessment with conventional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.