Literature DB >> 9987528

Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases.

H Y Sabet1, W D Edwards, H D Tazelaar, R C Daly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe a clinicopathologic study of a large group of congenitally bicuspid aortic valves surgically excised at a single institution.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical charts and bicuspid valves from patients undergoing aortic valve replacement at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1991 and 1996 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: The age of the 542 patients ranged from 1 to 86 years (mean, 61), and 372 (69%) were men. Among these, 409 (75%) had pure aortic stenosis (AS), 73 (13%) had pure aortic insufficiency (regurgitation) (AI), 53 (10%) had combined AS and AI, and 7 (1%) had normal function. The mean age was higher for those with AS than AI (65 versus 46 years; P < 0.001), whereas the male-to-female ratio was higher for AI than AS (17.3:1 versus 1.7:1; P < 0.001). The two cusps were not equal in size in 95%, and a raphe was present in 76% (67% typical, 9% atypical). Raphal position was described in 315 and was between the right and left cusps in 270 (86%). Raphal absence occurred more often in valves with equal-sized cusps than unequal (33% versus 14%; P = 0.005). Moderate to severe calcification affected valves with AS more frequently than AI (99% versus 41%; P < 0.001). In contrast, annular dilatation was associated with AI more than AS (48% versus 11%; P < 0.001). Acquired commissural fusion involved valves with combined AS and AI more often than the other functional states (31% versus 14%; P = 0.002). Sixteen patients (age range, 18 to 78 years; 13 men) had infective endocarditis (6 active, 10 healed), including 10 with AI (9 men), 3 with AS plus AI, 2 with AS, and 1 with normal function but embolization.
CONCLUSION: Functionally, the most common fate of congenitally bicuspid aortic valves was calcific stenosis with or without regurgitation (85%). Because approximately 4 million US citizens have bicuspid valves and because valve replacement is currently the only treatment of symptomatic AS, this disorder will continue to affect health-care costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9987528     DOI: 10.4065/74.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  77 in total

1.  Bicuspid aortic valve hemodynamics does not promote remodeling in porcine aortic wall concavity.

Authors:  Samantha K Atkins; Alison N Moore; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

2.  Management of patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Todd L Kiefer; Andrew Wang; G Chad Hughes; Thomas M Bashore
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-12

3.  Factors other than genotype account largely for the phenotypic variation of the pulmonary valve in Syrian hamsters.

Authors:  M Carmen Fernández; Ana C Durán; Borja Fernández; Josep M Arqué; Robert H Anderson; Valentín Sans-Coma
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Morphological assessment of the aortic valve using coronary computed tomography angiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Seung Choul Lee; Sung Min Ko; Meong Gun Song; Je Kyoun Shin; Hyun Keun Chee; Hweung Kon Hwang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  The surgical implications of bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Karl K Limmer; Thoralf M Sundt
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-01

Review 6.  Bicuspid aortic valve syndrome: a multidisciplinary approach for a complex entity.

Authors:  María Martín; Rebeca Lorca; José Rozado; Rubén Alvarez-Cabo; Juan Calvo; Isaac Pascual; Helena Cigarrán; Isabel Rodríguez; César Morís
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  T lymphocyte infiltration in non-rheumatic aortic stenosis: a comparative descriptive study between tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  L Wallby; B Janerot-Sjöberg; T Steffensen; M Broqvist
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Valvular heart disease in congenital heart disease: a narrative review.

Authors:  Joshua M Saef; Joanna Ghobrial
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

9.  Bicuspid valve-related aortic disease: flow assessment with conventional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Biomechanical modeling of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a stenotic bicuspid aortic valve: deployments and paravalvular leakage.

Authors:  Karin Lavon; Gil Marom; Matteo Bianchi; Rotem Halevi; Ashraf Hamdan; Adi Morany; Ehud Raanani; Danny Bluestein; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.602

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.