Literature DB >> 34503964

18F-BMS986192 PET Imaging of PD-L1 in Metastatic Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

Pieter H Nienhuis1, Inês F Antunes1, Andor W J M Glaudemans1, Mathilde Jalving2, David Leung3, Walter Noordzij1, Riemer H J A Slart1,4, Erik F J de Vries1, Geke A P Hospers5.   

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) frequently induces tumor response in metastatic melanoma patients. However, tumor response often takes months and may be heterogeneous. Consequently, additional local treatment for nonresponsive metastases may be needed, especially in the case of brain metastases. Noninvasive imaging may allow the characterization of (brain) metastases to predict response. This pilot study uses 18F-BMS986192 PET for PD-L1 expression to explore the variability in metastatic tracer uptake and its relation to tumor response, with a special focus on brain metastases.
Methods: Metastatic melanoma patients underwent whole-body 18F-BMS986192 PET/CT scanning before and 6 wk after starting ICI therapy. 18F-BMS986192 uptake was measured in healthy tissues, organs, and tumor lesions. Tumor response was evaluated at 12 wk using CT of the thorax/abdomen and MRI of the brain. RECIST, version 1.1, was used to define therapy response per patient. Response per lesion was measured by the percentage change in lesion diameter. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.
Results: Baseline 18F-BMS986192 PET/CT was performed in 8 patients, with follow-up scans in 4 patients. The highest tracer uptake was observed in the spleen, bone marrow, kidneys, and liver. Tracer uptake in tumor lesions was heterogeneous. In total, 42 tumor lesions were identified at baseline, with most lesions in the lungs (n = 21) and brain (n = 14). Tracer uptake was similar between tumor locations. 18F-BMS986192 uptake in lesions at baseline, corrected for blood-pool activity, was negatively correlated with the change lesion diameter at response evaluation (r = -0.49, P = 0.005), both in intra- and extracerebral lesions. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis demonstrated that 18F-BMS986192 uptake can discriminate between responding and nonresponding lesions with an area under the curve of 0.82. At the follow-up scan, an increased 18F-BMS986192 uptake compared with baseline scan was correlated with an increased lesion diameter at response evaluation. In the follow-up 18F-BMS986192 PET scan of 2 patients, ICI-related toxicity (thyroiditis and colitis) was detected.
Conclusion: In this pilot study, 18F-BMS986192 PET showed heterogeneous uptake in intra- and extracerebral metastatic lesions in melanoma patients. Baseline 18F-BMS986192 uptake was able to predict an ICI treatment-induced reduction in lesion volume, whereas the follow-up PET scan allowed the detection of treatment-induced toxicity.
© 2022 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PD-L1 expression; PET; brain metastasis; immune checkpoint inhibition; metastatic melanoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34503964      PMCID: PMC9157735          DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   11.082


  24 in total

1.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Caroline Robert; Luc Thomas; Igor Bondarenko; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey Weber; Claus Garbe; Celeste Lebbe; Jean-François Baurain; Alessandro Testori; Jean-Jacques Grob; Neville Davidson; Jon Richards; Michele Maio; Axel Hauschild; Wilson H Miller; Pere Gascon; Michal Lotem; Kaan Harmankaya; Ramy Ibrahim; Stephen Francis; Tai-Tsang Chen; Rachel Humphrey; Axel Hoos; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Molecular Imaging of PD-L1 Expression and Dynamics with the Adnectin-Based PET Tracer 18F-BMS-986192.

Authors:  Thijs S Stutvoet; Elly L van der Veen; Arjan Kol; Inês F Antunes; Erik F J de Vries; Geke A P Hospers; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Steven de Jong; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Survival Outcomes in Patients With Previously Untreated BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Melanoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy: Three-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

Authors:  Paolo A Ascierto; Georgina V Long; Caroline Robert; Benjamin Brady; Caroline Dutriaux; Anna Maria Di Giacomo; Laurent Mortier; Jessica C Hassel; Piotr Rutkowski; Catriona McNeil; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Kerry J Savage; Micaela M Hernberg; Celeste Lebbé; Julie Charles; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Cornelia Mauch; Francesco Cognetti; Lars Ny; Ana Arance; Inge Marie Svane; Dirk Schadendorf; Helen Gogas; Abdel Saci; Joel Jiang; Jasmine Rizzo; Victoria Atkinson
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Value of PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 Expression in the Clinical Practice as Predictors of Response to Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Stage Melanoma.

Authors:  Angel Santos-Briz; Javier Cañueto; Sofía Del Carmen; Beatriz Barrios; Manuela Yuste; Lorena Bellido; María Dolores Ludeña; Concepción Román
Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria.

Authors:  Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Mario Sznol; David F McDermott; Harriet M Kluger; Richard D Carvajal; William H Sharfman; Julie R Brahmer; Donald P Lawrence; Michael B Atkins; John D Powderly; Philip D Leming; Evan J Lipson; Igor Puzanov; David C Smith; Janis M Taube; Jon M Wigginton; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Drew M Pardoll; Jeffrey A Sosman; F Stephen Hodi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Frank Stephen Hodi; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Jean-Jacques Grob; Piotr Rutkowski; Charles Lance Cowey; Christopher D Lao; Dirk Schadendorf; John Wagstaff; Reinhard Dummer; Pier Francesco Ferrucci; Michael Smylie; Andrew Hill; David Hogg; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Joel Jiang; Jasmine Rizzo; James Larkin; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A N Niemeijer; D Leung; M C Huisman; I Bahce; O S Hoekstra; G A M S van Dongen; R Boellaard; S Du; W Hayes; R Smith; A D Windhorst; N H Hendrikse; A Poot; D J Vugts; E Thunnissen; P Morin; D Lipovsek; D J Donnelly; S J Bonacorsi; L M Velasquez; T D de Gruijl; E F Smit; A J de Langen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  An investigation of the relation between tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) and tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) in oncological FDG PET.

Authors:  Frank Hofheinz; Rebecca Bütof; Ivayla Apostolova; Klaus Zöphel; Ingo G Steffen; Holger Amthauer; Jörg Kotzerke; Michael Baumann; Jörg van den Hoff
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems.

Authors:  Andres Kaalep; Terez Sera; Wim Oyen; Bernd J Krause; Arturo Chiti; Yan Liu; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  7 in total

1.  Preclinical and first-in-human evaluation of 18F-labeled D-peptide antagonist for PD-L1 status imaging with PET.

Authors:  Ming Zhou; Xiaobo Wang; Bei Chen; Shijun Xiang; Wanqian Rao; Zhe Zhang; Huanhuan Liu; Jianyang Fang; Xiaoqin Yin; Pengbo Deng; Xianzhong Zhang; Shuo Hu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Radiopharmaceuticals as Novel Immune System Tracers.

Authors:  Natalie A Ridge; Anne Rajkumar-Calkins; Stephanie O Dudzinski; Austin N Kirschner; Neil B Newman
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 3.  Protein scaffolds: antibody alternatives for cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Renli Luo; Hongguang Liu; Zhen Cheng
Journal:  RSC Chem Biol       Date:  2022-05-25

4.  Imaging PD-L1 Expression in Melanoma Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Sridhar Nimmagadda
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.082

5.  PET imaging of an optimized anti-PD-L1 probe 68Ga-NODAGA-BMS986192 in immunocompetent mice and non-human primates.

Authors:  Huimin Zhou; Guangfa Bao; Ziqiang Wang; Buchuan Zhang; Dan Li; Lixing Chen; Xiaoyun Deng; Bo Yu; Jun Zhao; Xiaohua Zhu
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 6.  Targeted optical fluorescence imaging: a meta-narrative review and future perspectives.

Authors:  H M Schouw; L A Huisman; H H Boersma; S Kruijff; Y F Janssen; R H J A Slart; R J H Borra; A T M Willemsen; A H Brouwers; J M van Dijl; R A Dierckx; G M van Dam; W Szymanski
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  Molecular imaging to support cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Pim P van de Donk; Sjoukje F Oosting; Daan G Knapen; Anthonie J van der Wekken; Adrienne H Brouwers; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Derk-Jan A de Groot; Elisabeth Ge de Vries
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 12.469

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.