Literature DB >> 21639810

Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma.

Caroline Robert1, Luc Thomas, Igor Bondarenko, Steven O'Day, Jeffrey Weber, Claus Garbe, Celeste Lebbe, Jean-François Baurain, Alessandro Testori, Jean-Jacques Grob, Neville Davidson, Jon Richards, Michele Maio, Axel Hauschild, Wilson H Miller, Pere Gascon, Michal Lotem, Kaan Harmankaya, Ramy Ibrahim, Stephen Francis, Tai-Tsang Chen, Rachel Humphrey, Axel Hoos, Jedd D Wolchok.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ipilimumab monotherapy (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight), as compared with glycoprotein 100, improved overall survival in a phase 3 study involving patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma. We conducted a phase 3 study of ipilimumab (10 mg per kilogram) plus dacarbazine in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 502 patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma, in a 1:1 ratio, to ipilimumab (10 mg per kilogram) plus dacarbazine (850 mg per square meter of body-surface area) or dacarbazine (850 mg per square meter) plus placebo, given at weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10, followed by dacarbazine alone every 3 weeks through week 22. Patients with stable disease or an objective response and no dose-limiting toxic effects received ipilimumab or placebo every 12 weeks thereafter as maintenance therapy. The primary end point was overall survival.
RESULTS: Overall survival was significantly longer in the group receiving ipilimumab plus dacarbazine than in the group receiving dacarbazine plus placebo (11.2 months vs. 9.1 months, with higher survival rates in the ipilimumab-dacarbazine group at 1 year (47.3% vs. 36.3%), 2 years (28.5% vs. 17.9%), and 3 years (20.8% vs. 12.2%) (hazard ratio for death, 0.72; P<0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 56.3% of patients treated with ipilimumab plus dacarbazine, as compared with 27.5% treated with dacarbazine and placebo (P<0.001). No drug-related deaths or gastrointestinal perforations occurred in the ipilimumab-dacarbazine group.
CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab (at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram) in combination with dacarbazine, as compared with dacarbazine plus placebo, improved overall survival in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma. The types of adverse events were consistent with those seen in prior studies of ipilimumab; however, the rates of elevated liver-function values were higher and the rates of gastrointestinal events were lower than expected on the basis of prior studies. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00324155.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21639810     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  1597 in total

1.  Dividing and conquering: controlling advanced melanoma by targeting oncogene-defined subsets.

Authors:  Keith T Flaherty
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 2.  Mucosal melanoma: pathogenesis, clinical behavior, and management.

Authors:  Michael A Postow; Omid Hamid; Richard D Carvajal
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  A review of sentinel lymph node biopsy for thin melanoma.

Authors:  K M Joyce; N M McInerney; C W Joyce; D M Jones; A J Hussey; P Donnellan; M J Kerin; J L Kelly; P J Regan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Ipilimumab plus sargramostim vs ipilimumab alone for treatment of metastatic melanoma: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  F Stephen Hodi; Sandra Lee; David F McDermott; Uma N Rao; Lisa H Butterfield; Ahmad A Tarhini; Philip Leming; Igor Puzanov; Donghoon Shin; John M Kirkwood
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Association of Immunotherapy With Overall Survival in Elderly Patients With Melanoma.

Authors:  Marie Perier-Muzet; Elodie Gatt; Julien Péron; Claire Falandry; Mona Amini-Adlé; Luc Thomas; Stephane Dalle; Amelie Boespflug
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 6.  Re-adapting T cells for cancer therapy: from mouse models to clinical trials.

Authors:  Ingunn M Stromnes; Thomas M Schmitt; Aude G Chapuis; Sunil R Hingorani; Philip D Greenberg
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 7.  Advances in the development of cancer immunotherapies.

Authors:  Jianjun Gao; Chantale Bernatchez; Padmanee Sharma; Laszlo G Radvanyi; Patrick Hwu
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 8.  Immunotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Satoko Matsueda; David Y Graham
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Systemic BRAF/MEK Inhibitors as a Potential Treatment Option in Metastatic Conjunctival Melanoma.

Authors:  Joel M Mor; Ludwig M Heindl
Journal:  Ocul Oncol Pathol       Date:  2016-12-08

10.  Immuno-oncology Trial Endpoints: Capturing Clinically Meaningful Activity.

Authors:  Valsamo Anagnostou; Mark Yarchoan; Aaron R Hansen; Hao Wang; Franco Verde; Elad Sharon; Deborah Collyar; Laura Q M Chow; Patrick M Forde
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.