Literature DB >> 30361170

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Frank Stephen Hodi1, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni2, Rene Gonzalez3, Jean-Jacques Grob4, Piotr Rutkowski5, Charles Lance Cowey6, Christopher D Lao7, Dirk Schadendorf8, John Wagstaff9, Reinhard Dummer10, Pier Francesco Ferrucci11, Michael Smylie12, Andrew Hill13, David Hogg14, Ivan Marquez-Rodas15, Joel Jiang16, Jasmine Rizzo16, James Larkin17, Jedd D Wolchok18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previously reported results from the phase 3 CheckMate 067 trial showed a significant improvement in objective responses, progression-free survival, and overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma. The aim of this report is to provide 4-year updated efficacy and safety data from this study.
METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with previously untreated, unresectable, stage III or stage IV melanoma, known BRAFV600 mutation status, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive intravenous nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus placebo, or ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo. Randomisation was done via an interactive voice response system with a permuted block schedule (block size of six) and stratification by PD-L1 status, BRAF mutation status, and metastasis stage. The patients, investigators, study site staff, and study funder were masked to the study drug administered. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival. Efficacy analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population, whereas safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The results presented in this report reflect the 4-year update of the ongoing study with a database lock date of May 10, 2018. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01844505.
FINDINGS: Between July 3, 2013, and March 31, 2014, 945 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=314), nivolumab (n=316), or ipilimumab (n=315). Median follow-up was 46·9 months (IQR 10·9-51·8) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 36·0 months (10·5-51·4) in the nivolumab group, and 18·6 months (7·6-49·5) in the ipilimumab group. At a minimum follow-up of 48 months from the date that the final patient was enrolled and randomised, median overall survival was not reached (95% CI 38·2-not reached) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 36·9 months (28·3-not reached) in the nivolumab group, and 19·9 months (16·9-24·6) in the ipilimumab group. The hazard ratio for death for the combination versus ipilimumab was 0·54 (95% CI 0·44-0·67; p<0·0001) and for nivolumab versus ipilimumab was 0·65 (0·53-0·79; p<0·0001). Median progression-free survival was 11·5 months (95% CI 8·7-19·3) in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 6·9 months (5·1-10·2) in the nivolumab group, and 2·9 months (2·8-3·2) in the ipilimumab group. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival for the combination versus ipilimumab was 0·42 (95% CI 0·35-0·51; p<0·0001) and for nivolumab versus ipilimumab was 0·53 (0·44-0·64; p<0·0001). Treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 185 (59%) of 313 patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab, 70 (22%) of 313 who received nivolumab, and 86 (28%) of 311 who received ipilimumab. The most common treatment-related grade 3 adverse events were diarrhoea in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (29 [9%] of 313) and in the nivolumab group (nine [3%] of 313) and colitis in the ipilimumab group (23 [7%] of 311); the most common grade 4 adverse event in all three groups was increased lipase (15 [5%] of 313 in the combination group, ten [3%] of 313 in the nivolumab group, and four [1%] of 311 in the ipilimumab group). Serious adverse events were not analysed for the 4-year follow-up. In total for the study, there were four treatment-related deaths: two in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group (one cardiomyopathy and one liver necrosis), one in the nivolumab group (neutropenia), and one in the ipilimumab group (colon perforation). No additional treatment-related deaths have occurred since the previous (3-year) analysis.
INTERPRETATION: The results of this analysis at 4 years of follow-up show that a durable, sustained survival benefit can be achieved with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361170     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30700-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  381 in total

1.  Mammalian SWI/SNF Complex Genomic Alterations and Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Sarah Abou Alaiwi; Amin H Nassar; Wanling Xie; Ziad Bakouny; Jacob E Berchuck; David A Braun; Sylvan C Baca; Pier Vitale Nuzzo; Ronan Flippot; Tarek H Mouhieddine; Liam F Spurr; Yvonne Y Li; Taiwen Li; Abdallah Flaifel; John A Steinharter; Claire A Margolis; Natalie I Vokes; Heng Du; Sachet A Shukla; Andrew D Cherniack; Guru Sonpavde; Robert I Haddad; Mark M Awad; Marios Giannakis; F Stephen Hodi; X Shirley Liu; Sabina Signoretti; Cigall Kadoch; Matthew L Freedman; David J Kwiatkowski; Eliezer M Van Allen; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 11.151

2.  Sentinel bruising as a presentation of metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Lloyd Steele; Chit Cheng Yeoh
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-02-25

3.  Checkpoint blockade immunotherapy enhances the frequency and effector function of murine tumor-infiltrating T cells but does not alter TCRβ diversity.

Authors:  Lindsey M Kuehm; Kyle Wolf; John Zahour; Richard J DiPaolo; Ryan M Teague
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  [BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: first results on long-term efficacy of targeted therapies].

Authors:  R M Hermann; H Christiansen
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  A review of cancer immunotherapy: from the past, to the present, to the future.

Authors:  K Esfahani; L Roudaia; N Buhlaiga; S V Del Rincon; N Papneja; W H Miller
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Intravitreous Cutaneous Metastatic Melanoma in the Era of Checkpoint Inhibition: Unmasking and Masquerading.

Authors:  Jasmine H Francis; Duncan Berry; David H Abramson; Christopher A Barker; Chris Bergstrom; Hakan Demirci; Michael Engelbert; Hans Grossniklaus; Baker Hubbard; Codrin E Iacob; Korey Jaben; Madhavi Kurli; Michael A Postow; Jedd D Wolchok; Ivana K Kim; Jill R Wells
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 7.  Adverse Events Following Cancer Immunotherapy: Obstacles and Opportunities.

Authors:  Kristen E Pauken; Michael Dougan; Noel R Rose; Andrew H Lichtman; Arlene H Sharpe
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 8.  Combination immunotherapy strategies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hok Yee Chan; John Choi; Christina Jackson; Michael Lim
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Normalization Cancer Immunotherapy for Melanoma.

Authors:  Matthew D Vesely; Lieping Chen
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 10.  Mechanisms of Resistance to PD-1 Checkpoint Blockade.

Authors:  Justin C Moser; Siwen Hu-Lieskovan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.