Literature DB >> 33395045

Value of PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 Expression in the Clinical Practice as Predictors of Response to Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Stage Melanoma.

Angel Santos-Briz1,2, Javier Cañueto2,3, Sofía Del Carmen1,2, Beatriz Barrios2,4, Manuela Yuste2,3, Lorena Bellido2,4, María Dolores Ludeña1,2, Concepción Román2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has improved the survival outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma. To date, only a few studies have evaluated the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of PD-1 and CTLA-4 in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as predictive markers of response to ICI, most of them in the context of clinical trials. Moreover, the predictive value of PD-L1 in melanoma cells in the response to immunotherapy is unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the IHC expression of PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in samples of patients with advanced melanoma and to establish their prognostic value as predictors of ICI response in a university hospital.
METHODS: The expression of PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 was evaluated in pretreatment tumor samples in a series of 35 patients, 21 patients treated with nivolumab and 14 patients with ipilimumab in monotherapy.
RESULTS: In the nivolumab group, 4 tumors (19%) were positive for PD-L1 and all of them showed a partial response to the treatment. However, 4 patients whose tumors did not express PD-L1 also responded to nivolumab. PD-1 expression was not associated with better progression-free survival (PFS). In the ipilimumab group, 5 patients (35.7%) showed expression of CTLA-4. Positive cases showed a better PFS; however, one negative case responded to ipilimumab.
CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab produces a better response compared with ipilimumab in patients with melanoma. The IHC expression of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 are associated with a higher response rate to nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively, and better PFS, but the existence of responder patients with negative expression suggests that they are not adequate biomarkers to select candidate patients for ICI in the clinical practice.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33395045     DOI: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001856

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dermatopathol        ISSN: 0193-1091            Impact factor:   1.533


  2 in total

1.  18F-BMS986192 PET Imaging of PD-L1 in Metastatic Melanoma Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pieter H Nienhuis; Inês F Antunes; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Mathilde Jalving; David Leung; Walter Noordzij; Riemer H J A Slart; Erik F J de Vries; Geke A P Hospers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 11.082

2.  Immune checkpoint silencing using RNAi-incorporated nanoparticles enhances antitumor immunity and therapeutic efficacy compared with antibody-based approaches.

Authors:  Ji Eun Won; Youngseon Byeon; Tae In Wi; Chan Mi Lee; Ju Hyeong Lee; Tae Heung Kang; Jeong-Won Lee; YoungJoo Lee; Yeong-Min Park; Hee Dong Han
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 13.751

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.