S Lang1, P Hoelter2, M Schmidt2, C Strother3, C Kaethner4, M Kowarschik4, A Doerfler2. 1. From the Department of Neuroradiology (S.L., P.H., M.S., A.D.), University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany Stefan.Lang3@uk-erlangen.de. 2. From the Department of Neuroradiology (S.L., P.H., M.S., A.D.), University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology (C.S.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/366 Clinical Sciences Center, Madison, Wisconsin. 4. Advanced Therapies (C.K., M.K.), Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: By means of artificial intelligence, 3D angiography is a novel postprocessing method for 3D imaging of cerebral vessels. Because 3D angiography does not require a mask run like the current standard 3D-DSA, it potentially offers a considerable reduction of the patient radiation dose. Our aim was an assessment of the diagnostic value of 3D angiography for visualization of cerebrovascular pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D-DSA data sets of cerebral aneurysms (n CA = 10), AVMs (n AVM = 10), and dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) (n dAVF = 10) were reconstructed using both conventional and prototype software. Corresponding reconstructions have been analyzed by 2 neuroradiologists in a consensus reading in terms of image quality, injection vessel diameters (vessel diameter [VD] 1/2), vessel geometry index (VGI = VD1/VD2), and specific qualitative/quantitative parameters of AVMs (eg, location, nidus size, feeder, associated aneurysms, drainage, Spetzler-Martin score), dAVFs (eg, fistulous point, main feeder, diameter of the main feeder, drainage), and cerebral aneurysms (location, neck, size). RESULTS: In total, 60 volumes have been successfully reconstructed with equivalent image quality. The specific qualitative/quantitative assessment of 3D angiography revealed nearly complete accordance with 3D-DSA in AVMs (eg, mean nidus size3D angiography/3D-DSA= 19.9 [SD, 10.9]/20.2 [SD, 11.2] mm; r = 0.9, P = .001), dAVFs (eg, mean diameter of the main feeder3D angiography/3D-DSA= 2.04 [SD, 0.65]/2.05 [SD, 0.63] mm; r = 0.9, P = .001), and cerebral aneurysms (eg, mean size3D angiography/3D-DSA= 5.17 [SD, 3.4]/5.12 [SD, 3.3] mm; r = 0.9, P = .001). Assessment of the geometry of the injection vessel in 3D angiography data sets did not differ significantly from that of 3D-DSA (vessel geometry indexAVM: r = 0.84, P = .003; vessel geometry indexdAVF: r = 0.82, P = .003; vessel geometry indexCA: r = 0.84, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the artificial intelligence-based 3D angiography was a reliable method for visualization of complex cerebrovascular pathologies and showed results comparable with those of 3D-DSA. Thus, 3D angiography is a promising postprocessing method that provides a significant reduction of the patient radiation dose.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: By means of artificial intelligence, 3D angiography is a novel postprocessing method for 3D imaging of cerebral vessels. Because 3D angiography does not require a mask run like the current standard 3D-DSA, it potentially offers a considerable reduction of the patient radiation dose. Our aim was an assessment of the diagnostic value of 3D angiography for visualization of cerebrovascular pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D-DSA data sets of cerebral aneurysms (n CA = 10), AVMs (n AVM = 10), and dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) (n dAVF = 10) were reconstructed using both conventional and prototype software. Corresponding reconstructions have been analyzed by 2 neuroradiologists in a consensus reading in terms of image quality, injection vessel diameters (vessel diameter [VD] 1/2), vessel geometry index (VGI = VD1/VD2), and specific qualitative/quantitative parameters of AVMs (eg, location, nidus size, feeder, associated aneurysms, drainage, Spetzler-Martin score), dAVFs (eg, fistulous point, main feeder, diameter of the main feeder, drainage), and cerebral aneurysms (location, neck, size). RESULTS: In total, 60 volumes have been successfully reconstructed with equivalent image quality. The specific qualitative/quantitative assessment of 3D angiography revealed nearly complete accordance with 3D-DSA in AVMs (eg, mean nidus size3D angiography/3D-DSA= 19.9 [SD, 10.9]/20.2 [SD, 11.2] mm; r = 0.9, P = .001), dAVFs (eg, mean diameter of the main feeder3D angiography/3D-DSA= 2.04 [SD, 0.65]/2.05 [SD, 0.63] mm; r = 0.9, P = .001), and cerebral aneurysms (eg, mean size3D angiography/3D-DSA= 5.17 [SD, 3.4]/5.12 [SD, 3.3] mm; r = 0.9, P = .001). Assessment of the geometry of the injection vessel in 3D angiography data sets did not differ significantly from that of 3D-DSA (vessel geometry indexAVM: r = 0.84, P = .003; vessel geometry indexdAVF: r = 0.82, P = .003; vessel geometry indexCA: r = 0.84, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the artificial intelligence-based 3D angiography was a reliable method for visualization of complex cerebrovascular pathologies and showed results comparable with those of 3D-DSA. Thus, 3D angiography is a promising postprocessing method that provides a significant reduction of the patient radiation dose.
Authors: M Grass; R Koppe; E Klotz; R Proksa; M H Kuhn; H Aerts; J Op de Beek; R Kemkers Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 1999 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: C Oppenheim; J F Meder; D Trystram; F Nataf; S Godon-Hardy; J Blustajn; L Mérienne; M Schlienger; D Frédy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: C S Ogilvy; P E Stieg; I Awad; R D Brown; D Kondziolka; R Rosenwasser; W L Young; G Hademenos Journal: Stroke Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Monica S Pearl; Collin M Torok; Steven A Messina; Martin Radvany; Swati N Rao; Tina Ehtiati; Carol B Thompson; Philippe Gailloud Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 5.836
Authors: R Anxionnat; S Bracard; X Ducrocq; Y Trousset; L Launay; E Kerrien; M Braun; R Vaillant; F Scomazzoni; A Lebedinsky; L Picard Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 11.105