Literature DB >> 34499999

The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in nonimpaired individuals.

Neil Mittal1, Blaize C Majdic2, Adam P Sima3, Carrie L Peterson2.   

Abstract

Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) that can increase corticomotor excitability in distal upper limb muscles, but the effect on the more proximal biceps is unknown. The study objective was to determine the effect of iTBS on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in non-impaired individuals. Ten individuals completed three sessions, and an additional ten individuals completed one session in a secondary study; each session included sham and active iTBS. Resting and active motor thresholds (RMT, AMT) were determined prior to sham and active iTBS. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to single pulse TMS served as our measure of corticomotor excitability. In our primary cohort, MEPs were recorded with biphasic stimulation to accurately capture the same neurons affected by biphasic iTBS. MEPs were recorded at an intensity of 120% of RMT, or for instances of high RMTs, 100% of the maximum stimulator output (MSO), at baseline, and 10, 20, and 30 minutes after iTBS. MEPs were normalized by the maximum voluntary isometric muscle activity. In the secondary, MEPs were recorded with monophasic stimulation, which increased our ability to record MEPs at 120% of RMT. Linear mixed effects models were used to determine the effect of iTBS on normalized MEPs (nMEPs), with analyses to evaluate the interaction of the biceps AMT:RMT ratio as a measure of corticomotor conductance. Change in nMEPs from baseline did not differ for the active and sham conditions (p = 0.915 ) when MEPs were assessed with biphasic stimulation. With MEPs assessed by monophasic stimulation, there was an increase in biceps nMEPs after active iTBS, and no change in nMEPs after sham. Our results suggest that when RMTs are expected to be high when measured with biphasic stimulation, monophasic stimulation can better capture changes in MEPs induced by iTBS, and biphasic stimulation appears limited in its ability to capture changes in biceps MEPs in nonimpaired individuals. In both cohorts, increased corticomotor excitability after iTBS occurred when the biceps AMT:RMT ratio was high. Thus, the AMT:RMT ratio may be a predictive measure to evaluate the potential for iTBS to increase biceps corticomotor excitability.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticomotor Excitability; Motor Learning; Neuromodulation; Rehabilitation; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Upper Limb

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34499999      PMCID: PMC8572155          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  59 in total

1.  Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility.

Authors:  J P Brasil-Neto; L M McShane; P Fuhr; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-02

Review 2.  Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS).

Authors:  Wanalee Klomjai; Rose Katz; Alexandra Lackmy-Vallée
Journal:  Ann Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-08-28

3.  Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Theta burst stimulation does not reliably depress all regions of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  P G Martin; S C Gandevia; J L Taylor
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee.

Authors:  P M Rossini; A T Barker; A Berardelli; M D Caramia; G Caruso; R Q Cracco; M R Dimitrijević; M Hallett; Y Katayama; C H Lücking
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08

Review 6.  Corticospinal neurones. Their role in movement.

Authors:  C G Phillips; R Porter
Journal:  Monogr Physiol Soc       Date:  1977

7.  Motor priming in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Stoykov; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 8.  State of the art: Pharmacologic effects on cortical excitability measures tested by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Leonardo G Cohen; Charles H Large; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael Nitsche; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; F Rosenow; John C Rothwell; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Mechanisms underlying long-interval cortical inhibition in the human motor cortex: a TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Nigel C Rogasch; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  Preferential Activation of Unique Motor Cortical Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review of the Physiological, Functional, and Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  George M Opie; John G Semmler
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-12-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of neuroanatomy on corticomotor excitability during and after transcranial magnetic stimulation and intermittent theta burst stimulation.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Bhushan Thakkar; Cooper B Hodges; Connor Lewis; Yeajin Cho; Ravi L Hadimani; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.399

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.