P G Martin1, S C Gandevia, J L Taylor. 1. Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute and University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The excitability of the human motor cortex projecting to hand muscles can be reduced by theta burst transcranial magnetic repetitive stimulation (TBS). This study compared the magnitude and variability of changes evoked by TBS for a distal and proximal arm muscle. METHODS: Eight subjects participated in three studies. In each study, electromyographic responses (MEPs) to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation assessed cortical excitability before and after 40s of TBS. In the first two studies, TBS (intensity, 80% active motor threshold) was delivered to the optimal locations for biceps or first dorsal interosseous (FDI). In the final study, weaker intensity TBS was delivered over the biceps representation. RESULTS: TBS targeting biceps produced highly variable results among subjects. For the group, MEPs were not significantly depressed. Repeat studies in individual subjects highlighted the variability of responses. For FDI, MEPs were significantly depressed 5min after TBS and remained depressed for >30min (p<0.05). No significant changes in biceps MEPs occurred with weaker TBS. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude and reliability of TBS depends on the region of the cortex targeted. SIGNIFICANCE: Results obtained for the hand should not be considered indicative of changes that will occur in other regions of the motor cortex or the brain.
OBJECTIVE: The excitability of the human motor cortex projecting to hand muscles can be reduced by theta burst transcranial magnetic repetitive stimulation (TBS). This study compared the magnitude and variability of changes evoked by TBS for a distal and proximal arm muscle. METHODS: Eight subjects participated in three studies. In each study, electromyographic responses (MEPs) to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation assessed cortical excitability before and after 40s of TBS. In the first two studies, TBS (intensity, 80% active motor threshold) was delivered to the optimal locations for biceps or first dorsal interosseous (FDI). In the final study, weaker intensity TBS was delivered over the biceps representation. RESULTS:TBS targeting biceps produced highly variable results among subjects. For the group, MEPs were not significantly depressed. Repeat studies in individual subjects highlighted the variability of responses. For FDI, MEPs were significantly depressed 5min after TBS and remained depressed for >30min (p<0.05). No significant changes in biceps MEPs occurred with weaker TBS. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude and reliability of TBS depends on the region of the cortex targeted. SIGNIFICANCE: Results obtained for the hand should not be considered indicative of changes that will occur in other regions of the motor cortex or the brain.
Authors: Satish Mistry; Eric Verin; Salil Singh; Samantha Jefferson; John C Rothwell; David G Thompson; Shaheen Hamdy Journal: J Physiol Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Charlotte Nettekoven; Lukas J Volz; Martha Leimbach; Eva-Maria Pool; Anne K Rehme; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 6.556