Literature DB >> 33295685

Preferential Activation of Unique Motor Cortical Networks With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review of the Physiological, Functional, and Clinical Evidence.

George M Opie1, John G Semmler1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The corticospinal volley produced by application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over primary motor cortex consists of a number of waves generated by trans-synaptic input from interneuronal circuits. These indirect (I)-waves mediate the sensitivity of TMS to cortical plasticity and intracortical excitability and can be assessed by altering the direction of cortical current induced by TMS. While this methodological approach has been conventionally viewed as preferentially recruiting early or late I-wave inputs from a given populations of neurons, growing evidence suggests recruitment of different neuronal populations, and this would strongly influence interpretation and application of these measures. The aim of this review is therefore to consider the physiological, functional, and clinical evidence for the independence of the neuronal circuits activated by different current directions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To provide the relevant context, we begin with an overview of TMS methodology, focusing on the different techniques used to quantify I-waves. We then comprehensively review the literature that has used variations in coil orientation to investigate the I-wave circuits, grouping studies based on the neurophysiological, functional, and clinical relevance of their outcomes.
RESULTS: Review of the existing literature reveals significant evidence supporting the idea that varying current direction can recruit different neuronal populations having unique functionally and clinically relevant characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research providing greater characterization of the I-wave circuits activated with different current directions is required. This will facilitate the development of interventions that are able to modulate specific intracortical circuits, which will be an important application of TMS.
© 2020 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AP TMS; I-waves; PA TMS; SICF; cervical epidural recordings; current direction; intracortical motor circuits; single-motor unit recordings; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33295685     DOI: 10.1111/ner.13314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  7 in total

1.  The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in nonimpaired individuals.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Adam P Sima; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation disrupts neuroplasticity of intracortical motor circuits.

Authors:  Wei-Yeh Liao; Ryoki Sasaki; John G Semmler; George M Opie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Andris Cerins; Daniel Corp; George Opie; Michael Do; Bridgette Speranza; Jason He; Pamela Barhoun; Ian Fuelscher; Peter Enticott; Christian Hyde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Contribution of TMS and TMS-EEG to the Understanding of Mechanisms Underlying Physiological Brain Aging.

Authors:  Andrea Guerra; Lorenzo Rocchi; Alberto Grego; Francesca Berardi; Concetta Luisi; Florinda Ferreri
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-22

5.  Modulation of Motor Cortex Plasticity by Repetitive Paired-Pulse TMS at Late I-Wave Intervals Is Influenced by Intracortical Excitability.

Authors:  George M Opie; Ryoki Sasaki; Brodie J Hand; John G Semmler
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-18

6.  Impaired phase synchronization of motor-evoked potentials reflects the degree of motor dysfunction in the lesioned human brain.

Authors:  Georgios Naros; Kathrin Machetanz; Maria Teresa Leao; Sophie Wang; Marcos Tatagiba; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 5.399

Review 7.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Neocortical Neurons: The Micro-Macro Connection.

Authors:  Dongting Tian; Shin-Ichi Izumi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 5.152

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.