Literature DB >> 34498094

Implantation of Large Diameter (5.5-6 mm) Derivo Embolization Devices for the Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms.

Waleed Butt1,2, Cha-Ney Kim3, Rajesh Ramaswamy3, Aubrey Smith3, Paul Maliakal3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of flow diverters is dependent upon robust wall apposition in the parent artery. Usage in large caliber cerebral vessels has therefore been limited as few implants with diameters > 5 mm exist. We present our initial experience in treating cerebral aneurysms using the 5.5 mm and 6 mm diameter implants of the Derivo embolization device (DED).
METHODS: Our prospectively maintained institutional database was reviewed to identify patients in whom a > 5 mm DED was implanted between November 2016 and February 2021. The primary efficacy outcome was complete or near-complete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months (O'Kelly-Marotta, OKM, C-D, adapted for magnetic resonance angiography). Safety outcomes included 30-day major morbidity defined as modified Rankin Score (mRS) 3-5, mortality, serious adverse events and procedural complications.
RESULTS: A total of 21 large diameter DEDs were deployed in 18 patients (age 59.5 ± 14.1 years), harboring 19 unruptured aneurysms. Of the aneurysms 14 (73.7%) were saccular in morphology (sac diameter 10.9 ± 5.5 mm, neck diameter 6.8 ± 3.1 mm), 3 (15.8%) aneurysms were dissecting, 1 (5.3%) iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm and 1 (5.3%) fusiform. Aneurysm locations were: ICA (internal carotid artery) (n = 17); (7 cavernous, 4 paraophthalmic, 2 paraclinoid, 1 petrous, 2 communicating, 1 cervical); vertebrobasilar (n = 2). Adjunct stenting to optimize proximal wall apposition was undertaken in 5 (27.8%) patients. At 6 months 75% of patients followed-up met the primary efficacy endpoint (OKM C-D). There were no serious adverse events, 30-day major morbidity (mRS 3-5) or mortality.
CONCLUSION: Implantation of large diameter (5.5 mm and 6 mm) DEDs into capacious cerebral vessels to treat a range of complex aneurysms is safe and technically feasible but may require adjunct stenting to optimize proximal wall apposition. Short-term efficacy of this device subset is comparable to previous DED and other flow diverter studies. Long-term follow-up and comparative studies are required for further assessment.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embolization; Endovascular; Flow diverter; Intracranial aneurysm; Stent

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34498094     DOI: 10.1007/s00062-021-01086-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1869-1439            Impact factor:   3.649


  31 in total

1.  A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents.

Authors:  C J O'kelly; T Krings; D Fiorella; T R Marotta
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Reply.

Authors:  A Rouchaud; W Brinjikji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Derivo Embolization Device for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Felipe Padovani Trivelato; Daniel Giansante Abud; Alexandre Cordeiro Ulhôa; Eduardo Siqueira Waihrich; Thiago Giansante Abud; Luis Henrique Castro Afonso; Guilherme Seizem Nakiri; Guilherme Duarte de Castro; Bruno de Sousa Mendes Parente; Rodrigo Dos Santos Silva; Luciano Bambini Manzato; Lucas Eduardo Bonadio; Dinark Conceição Viana; José Ricardo Vanzin; Carlos Eduardo Baccin; Marco Túlio Salles Rezende
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  The sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA compared with DSA in the follow-up of treated intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Sishi Xiang; Fu Fan; Peng Hu; Kun Yang; Xiaodong Zhai; Jiewen Geng; Zhe Ji; Jie Lu; Hongqi Zhang
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.836

5.  Retrieval of distally migrated coil using stent retriever and proximal aspiration.

Authors:  Alan Mendez-Ruiz; Aldo A Mendez; Cynthia B Zevallos; Darko Quispe Orozco; Mudassir Farooqui; Edgar A Samaniego; Sudeepta Dandapat; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 8.572

6.  Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the pipeline embolization device.

Authors:  S R Boddu; F C Tong; S Dehkharghani; J E Dion; A M Saindane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 7.  The physics of endoluminal stenting in the treatment of cerebrovascular aneurysms.

Authors:  Baruch B Lieber; Matthew J Gounis
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.448

8.  Safety and efficacy of the Derivo Embolization Device for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Lukas Goertz; Franziska Dorn; Bastian Kraus; Jan Borggrefe; Marc Schlamann; Robert Forbrig; Bernd Turowski; Christoph Kabbasch
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.836

9.  Internal Carotid Artery Reconstruction with a "Mega Flow Diverter": First Experience with the 6×50 mm DERIVO Embolization Device.

Authors:  Mario Martínez-Galdámez; Claudio Rodríguez; Antonio Hermosín; Eduardo Crespo-Vallejo; Gonzalo Monedero; Juan Chaviano; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2018-08-31

10.  Republished: Interhospital teleproctoring of endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment using a dedicated live-streaming technology: first experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Matthias Bechstein; Samer Elsheikh; Fritz Wodarg; Christian A Taschner; Uta Hanning; Jan-Hendrik Buhk; Rosalie McDonough; Einar Goebell; Jens Fiehler; Maxim Bester
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.