The sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA compared with DSA in the follow-up of treated intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is widely used in detecting intracranial aneurysms (IA), but it is limited and controversial for use during follow-up to assess the outcome of interventional coiling or clipping surgery.
METHODS: To evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of using TOF-MRA as an imaging follow-up for IA with different treatments. A total of 280 patients with 326 treated IA underwent simultaneous TOF-MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as follow-up imaging on the same day. All images were independently reviewed by two neurosurgeons and two radiologists. The consensus evaluation of intra-arterial DSA as a reference test was used to evaluate the result of aneurysm occlusions. The aneurysmal embolization status was assessed with two ratings involving complete or incomplete occlusions. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of three-dimensional-TOF-MRA to investigate the diagnostic performance.
RESULTS: Overall sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA for diagnosing the remnant were 83.3% and 95.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of interventional therapy was 90.0% and 94.2%, respectively, while the clipping group showed sensitivity and specificity of 50.0% and 100%, respectively. For additional groups, involving coil only, stent-assisted, and flow diverter, the analysis of interventional therapy showed sensitivities and specificities of 100.0% and 90.1%, 66.7% and 95.1%, and 91.7% and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: TOF-MRA can be used as a first-line noninvasive imaging modality during follow-up, especially for the patients treated with a pipeline embolization device and coils only. But it may not be enough for clipped aneurysms. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.