Faisal Fakhouri1,2, Stephan Kannengiesser3, Josef Pfeuffer3, Yevgeniya Gokun4, Arunark Kolipaka1,2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 3. MR Application Development, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lung stiffness alters with many diseases; therefore, several MR elastography (MRE) studies were performed earlier to investigate the stiffness of the right lung during breathhold at residual volume and total lung capacity. The aims of this study were 1) to estimate shear stiffness of the lungs using MRE under free breathing and demonstrate the measurements' repeatability and reproducibility, and 2) to compare lung stiffness under free breathing to breathhold and as a function of age and gender. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy volunteers were scanned on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Spin-echo dual-density spiral and a spin-echo EPI MRE sequences were used to measure shear stiffness of the lungs during free breathing and breathhold at midpoint of tidal volume, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the spin-echo dual-density spiral-derived shear stiffness. Repeated measures analyses of variances were used to investigate differences in shear stiffness between spin-echo dual-density spiral and spin-echo EPI, right and left lungs, males and females, and different age groups. RESULTS: Free-breathing MRE sequence was highly repeatable and reproducible (concordance correlation coefficient > 0.86 for both lungs). Lung stiffness was significantly lower in breathhold than in free breathing (P < .001), which can be attributed to potential stress relaxation of lung parenchyma or breathhold inconsistencies. However, there was no significant difference between different age groups (P = .08). The left lung showed slightly higher stiffness values than the right lung (P = .14). There is no significant difference in lung stiffness between genders. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of free-breathing lung MRE with excellent repeatability and reproducibility. Stiffness changes with age and during the respiratory cycle. However, gender does not influence lungs stiffness.
PURPOSE: Lung stiffness alters with many diseases; therefore, several MR elastography (MRE) studies were performed earlier to investigate the stiffness of the right lung during breathhold at residual volume and total lung capacity. The aims of this study were 1) to estimate shear stiffness of the lungs using MRE under free breathing and demonstrate the measurements' repeatability and reproducibility, and 2) to compare lung stiffness under free breathing to breathhold and as a function of age and gender. METHODS: Twenty-five healthy volunteers were scanned on a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner. Spin-echo dual-density spiral and a spin-echo EPI MRE sequences were used to measure shear stiffness of the lungs during free breathing and breathhold at midpoint of tidal volume, respectively. Concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to determine the repeatability and reproducibility of the spin-echo dual-density spiral-derived shear stiffness. Repeated measures analyses of variances were used to investigate differences in shear stiffness between spin-echo dual-density spiral and spin-echo EPI, right and left lungs, males and females, and different age groups. RESULTS: Free-breathing MRE sequence was highly repeatable and reproducible (concordance correlation coefficient > 0.86 for both lungs). Lung stiffness was significantly lower in breathhold than in free breathing (P < .001), which can be attributed to potential stress relaxation of lung parenchyma or breathhold inconsistencies. However, there was no significant difference between different age groups (P = .08). The left lung showed slightly higher stiffness values than the right lung (P = .14). There is no significant difference in lung stiffness between genders. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of free-breathing lung MRE with excellent repeatability and reproducibility. Stiffness changes with age and during the respiratory cycle. However, gender does not influence lungs stiffness.
Authors: Andy J Swift; Neil Woodhouse; Stan Fichele; Jochen Siedel; Gary H Mills; Edwin J R van Beek; Jim M Wild Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Christian Plathow; Christian Fink; Alexandra Sandner; Sebastian Ley; Michael Puderbach; Monika Eichinger; Astrid Schmähl; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: A Manduca; T E Oliphant; M A Dresner; J L Mahowald; S A Kruse; E Amromin; J P Felmlee; J F Greenleaf; R L Ehman Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Sebastiaan Holverda; Rebecca J Theilmann; Rui C Sá; Tatsuya J Arai; Evan T Hall; David J Dubowitz; G Kim Prisk; Susan R Hopkins Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Meng Yin; Kevin J Glaser; Jayant A Talwalkar; Jun Chen; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yogesh K Mariappan; Kevin J Glaser; Rolf D Hubmayr; Armando Manduca; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: John P Marinelli; David L Levin; Robert Vassallo; Rickey E Carter; Rolf D Hubmayr; Richard L Ehman; Kiaran P McGee Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 4.813