Literature DB >> 34457685

Integration of ultrasound in medical School: Effects on Physical Examination Skills of Undergraduates.

Vittorio Oteri1, Federica Occhipinti2, Giorgia Gribaudo3, Francesco Marastoni4, Emanuele Chisari1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US) imaging has rapidly increased its application in almost every medical field. Many universities worldwide provide teaching of US for undergraduates in their curricula. Emerging evidence is supporting the use of ultrasonography to improve also non-US skills and knowledge of medical students.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review is to understand if the integration of US lessons into medical students' curriculum improves their learning of physical examination and enhances their skills when performing it.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of literature by searching three electronic medical databases. We included studies of any level of evidence published in peer-reviewed journals. Evaluated data were extracted using the PICO framework and critically analyzed. PRISMA guidelines were applied; we excluded all the articles evaluated with serious risk of bias and/or low methodological quality.
RESULTS: We included 15 articles, accounting for more than 1643 medical students involved from five different countries and 14 various academical institutions. Eight out of nine studies (88.9%) reported an improvement of practical physical examination scores by students exposed to ultrasound lectures. Eleven out of eleven studies (100%), which administered self-assessment questionnaires, reported strong agreement among students that ultrasound lectures helped them learning and understanding the physical exam and improved their confidence and skills.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing evidence shows that incorporating ultrasound in medical students' curriculum might improve their ability and confidence when learning and performing a physical exam. This significant tendency needs to be corroborated at a deeper level by further studies. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Physical exam; Undergraduates; medical education; ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457685      PMCID: PMC8368431          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-00921-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  42 in total

1.  Teaching cardiovascular anatomy to medical students by using a handheld ultrasound device.

Authors:  Christopher M Wittich; Samantha C Montgomery; Michelle A Neben; Brian A Palmer; Mark J Callahan; James B Seward; Wojciech Pawlina; Charles J Bruce
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Evaluating Didactic Methods for Training Medical Students in the Use of Bedside Ultrasound for Clinical Practice at a Faculty of Medicine in Romania.

Authors:  Cosmin C Florescu; Jeffrey A Mullen; Vivian My Nguyen; Brooke E Sanders; Priscilla Quynh-Phuon Vu
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  New path for teaching anatomy: living anatomy and medical imaging vs. dissection.

Authors:  John C McLachlan
Journal:  Anat Rec B New Anat       Date:  2004-11

4.  Peer teaching: a randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Ralf Münker; Richard M Sellei; Malte Holschen; Saskia C Mooij; Bernhard Schmidt-Rohlfing; Fritz-Uwe Niethard; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 5.  Ultrasound Curricula in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Usman Tarique; Brandon Tang; Manni Singh; Kulamakan Mahan Kulasegaram; Jonathan Ailon
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Does it Affect Scores on Standardized Assessment Tests Used Within the Preclinical Curriculum?

Authors:  Rachel B Liu; David N Suwondo; Joseph H Donroe; John A Encandela; Karrin S Weisenthal; Christopher L Moore
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  The use of ultrasonography in learning clinical examination - a pilot study involving third year medical students.

Authors:  Daniela Fodor; Radu Badea; Laura Poanta; Dan Lucian Dumitrascu; Anca Dana Buzoianu; Petru-Adrian Mircea
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.611

8.  Development and evaluation of methodologies for teaching focused cardiac ultrasound skills to medical students.

Authors:  Thomas R Cawthorn; Curtis Nickel; Michael O'Reilly; Henryk Kafka; James W Tam; Lynel C Jackson; Anthony J Sanfilippo; Amer M Johri
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  An economical strategy for early medical education in ultrasound.

Authors:  Alexandra Mullen; Brendan Kim; Jose Puglisi; Nena Lundgreen Mason
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Assessment of a new e-learning system on thorax, trachea, and lung ultrasound.

Authors:  Colleen Cuca; Patrick Scheiermann; Dorothea Hempel; Gabriele Via; Armin Seibel; Magnus Barth; Tim O Hirche; Felix Walcher; Raoul Breitkreutz
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 1.112

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cochrane's risk of bias tool for non-randomized studies (ROBINS-I) is frequently misapplied: A methodological systematic review.

Authors:  Erik Igelström; Mhairi Campbell; Peter Craig; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Comparing the Effectiveness and Image Quality of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound of First-Year Medical Students After Training by Student Tutors Versus Ultrasound Instructors: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Li; Jane J Kim; Corey Young; Fauzia Nausheen
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.