OBJECTIVES:Medical students' time is limited, so efficiency in medical education is valued. This research project aimed to determine the most effective means to teach bedside ultrasound to medical students in a 1-week training course. We hypothesized that the best method would include a combination of podcasts and hands-on teaching; therefore, there would be a statistically significant difference among the various methods of teaching. METHODS:Medical students were randomly assigned to 3 groups. All groups attended a 50-minute hands-on bedside ultrasound training session. Students in the first group attended a 50-minute live lecture before the hands-on session, whereas students in the second group watched a podcast that covered the same material as the live lecture. Students in the third group served as the control and only attended the hands-on sessions. Five topics were covered during the course: (1) introduction to ultrasound, (2) pulmonary ultrasound, (3) cardiac ultrasound, (4) hepatobiliary ultrasound, and (5) focused assessment with sonography for trauma. Students completed a 20-question pre- and post-training quiz that covered basic ultrasound principles. Students also conducted a focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination for the practical portion of their evaluation. RESULTS:Students' pre- to post-training quiz scores increased from 33.6% to 72.6% correct in the lecture group (n = 21; P < .0001), from 40.7% to 75.5% correct in the podcast group (n = 20; P< .0001), and from 37.8% to 70.0% correct in the control group (n = 23; P< .0001). Data analysis of written and practical examination scores showed no significant differences among the groups [F(2,61) = 0.885; P = .418; F(2,60) = 1.739; P = .184, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that all 3 methods are equally effective in teaching novice medical students basic ultrasound knowledge and skills.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Medical students' time is limited, so efficiency in medical education is valued. This research project aimed to determine the most effective means to teach bedside ultrasound to medical students in a 1-week training course. We hypothesized that the best method would include a combination of podcasts and hands-on teaching; therefore, there would be a statistically significant difference among the various methods of teaching. METHODS: Medical students were randomly assigned to 3 groups. All groups attended a 50-minute hands-on bedside ultrasound training session. Students in the first group attended a 50-minute live lecture before the hands-on session, whereas students in the second group watched a podcast that covered the same material as the live lecture. Students in the third group served as the control and only attended the hands-on sessions. Five topics were covered during the course: (1) introduction to ultrasound, (2) pulmonary ultrasound, (3) cardiac ultrasound, (4) hepatobiliary ultrasound, and (5) focused assessment with sonography for trauma. Students completed a 20-question pre- and post-training quiz that covered basic ultrasound principles. Students also conducted a focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination for the practical portion of their evaluation. RESULTS: Students' pre- to post-training quiz scores increased from 33.6% to 72.6% correct in the lecture group (n = 21; P < .0001), from 40.7% to 75.5% correct in the podcast group (n = 20; P< .0001), and from 37.8% to 70.0% correct in the control group (n = 23; P< .0001). Data analysis of written and practical examination scores showed no significant differences among the groups [F(2,61) = 0.885; P = .418; F(2,60) = 1.739; P = .184, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that all 3 methods are equally effective in teaching novice medical students basic ultrasound knowledge and skills.
Authors: Carlos Augusto M Menegozzo; Priscila Gadelho Cazolari; Fernando da Costa Ferreira Novo; Ramiro Colleoni; Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Nikolaos Vrachnis; Aris T Papageorghiou; Caterina M Bilardo; Alfred Abuhamad; Ann Tabor; Titia E Cohen-Overbeek; Eleni Xilakis; Flora Mates; Sarah P Johnson; Jon Hyett Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 2.463