Literature DB >> 34457605

A Survey of Health Sciences Faculty Practices and Attitudes Regarding the Peer Feedback Component of Team-Based Learning.

Sarah Lerchenfeldt1, Marty Eng2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peer feedback, an essential component of team-based learning (TBL), fosters accountability among team members. Effective utilization can be advantageous for both students and faculty, although there may be many implementation challenges. Our study objectives were to (1) identify current practices of peer feedback in TBL, (2) identify curricular assessment related to peer feedback, and (3) identify challenges with peer feedback in TBL.
METHODS: A survey link was sent via medical and TBL web boards. The survey asked for both quantitative and qualitative information regarding the peer feedback process. Quantitative results were analyzed using SPSS®. NVivo® was used to identify and code themes in open-ended responses. Both investigators reviewed and agreed upon themes.
RESULTS: Sixty-one TBL users in health professions completed the survey. Multiple health professions were represented with medicine and pharmacy being the most common. Information on current practices showed a wide variety of implementation. Curricular alignment was common. Time and training were the most common challenges and difficulties.
CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful feedback should be considered an important curricular outcome. Specific learning objectives and appropriate assessment strategies should be developed to meet the mission of the program. Students must receive guidance from faculty members on how to improve their skills in providing effective feedback. Overall, faculty saw peer evaluation as valuable. However, the time commitment, lack of student training, and student attitudes make implementation difficult. Future research should focus on best practices to streamline the TBL feedback process and on student training regarding how to provide effective feedback. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health education; Peer assessment; Peer evaluation; Peer feedback; Team-based learning

Year:  2019        PMID: 34457605      PMCID: PMC8368767          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-019-00816-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  13 in total

1.  Role modeling in physicians' professional formation: reconsidering an essential but untapped educational strategy.

Authors:  Nuala P Kenny; Karen V Mann; Heather MacLeod
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Perspective: Guidelines for reporting team-based learning activities in the medical and health sciences education literature.

Authors:  Paul Haidet; Ruth E Levine; Dean X Parmelee; Sheila Crow; Frances Kennedy; P Adam Kelly; Linda Perkowski; Larry Michaelsen; Boyd F Richards
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Can there be a single system for peer assessment of professionalism among medical students? A multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Louise Arnold; Carolyn K Shue; Summers Kalishman; Michael Prislin; Charles Pohl; Henry Pohl; David T Stern
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Best practices for implementing team-based learning in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Michelle Z Farland; Brigitte L Sicat; Andrea S Franks; Karen S Pater; Melissa S Medina; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anne C Nofziger; Elizabeth H Naumburg; Barbara J Davis; Christopher J Mooney; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback.

Authors:  Julian C Archer
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Giving effective feedback to medical students: a workshop for faculty and house staff.

Authors:  H Brukner
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Peer feedback as an aid to learning--what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!

Authors:  Annie Cushing; Stephen Abbott; Doug Lothian; Angela Hall; Olwyn M R Westwood
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  How to Write Well-Defined Learning Objectives.

Authors:  Debnath Chatterjee; Janet Corral
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2017-10-01

Review 10.  Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review.

Authors:  Annette W Burgess; Deborah M McGregor; Craig M Mellis
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.