Literature DB >> 20042840

Impact of peer assessment on the professional development of medical students: a qualitative study.

Anne C Nofziger1, Elizabeth H Naumburg, Barbara J Davis, Christopher J Mooney, Ronald M Epstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Peer assessment can predict future academic performance and provide medical students with reliable feedback about professionalism. It is unclear whether peer assessment fosters personal growth or transformations in attitudes or behaviors. The authors investigated what types of peer feedback students remember and what reactions or transformations students experience as a result of peer assessment.
METHOD: In May 2005, the authors invited medical students from the second-year (n = 101) and fourth-year (n = 83) classes to provide narratives about how peer assessment affected their personal and professional development. All students had participated in peer assessment during required, formative comprehensive assessments. The authors analyzed responses using mixed qualitative-quantitative methods.
RESULTS: The 138 responses represented 82% and 69% of students from the fourth-year and second-year classes, respectively. Students recalled peer assessment content about both positive (e.g., teaching skills) and negative (e.g., overconfidence) qualities. Both positive (e.g., appreciation) and negative (e.g., anger) emotional reactions were reported. Many (67%) found peer assessment helpful, reassuring, or confirming of something they knew; 65% reported important transformations in awareness, attitudes, or behaviors because of peer assessment. Change was more likely when feedback was specific and described an area for improvement. Wholly negative responses to the peer assessment process were rare.
CONCLUSIONS: Peer assessment can be a powerful tool to assess and encourage formation of professional behaviors, particularly the interpersonal dimensions. Participants should receive training to provide specific, constructive feedback. The institutional culture should emphasize safety around feedback, while committing to rewarding excellence and addressing concerning behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20042840     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c47a5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  20 in total

1.  Teaching medical professionalism.

Authors:  Sarah Riley; Namita Kumar
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.659

2.  Resident Perceptions of Giving and Receiving Peer-to-Peer Feedback.

Authors:  Maria Syl D de la Cruz; Michael T Kopec; Leslie A Wimsatt
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

3.  Medical Students' Perceptions of Peer Assessment in a Problem-based Learning Curriculum.

Authors:  Yasin I Tayem; Henry James; Khalid A J Al-Khaja; Rima L A Razzak; Bhagath K Potu; Reginald P Sequeira
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-08-24

4.  Pharmacy students' perceptions of and attitudes towards peer assessment within a drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Kimberly Wu; Lindsay Davison; Amy Heck Sheehan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  A Survey of Health Sciences Faculty Practices and Attitudes Regarding the Peer Feedback Component of Team-Based Learning.

Authors:  Sarah Lerchenfeldt; Marty Eng
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-09-13

6.  Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design.

Authors:  Dayane Daou; Ramzi Sabra; Nathalie K Zgheib
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-05-19

7.  Unheard Voices: A Qualitative Study of Resident Perspectives on Remediation.

Authors:  Sara M Krzyzaniak; Bonnie Kaplan; Daniella Lucas; Elizabeth Bradley; Stephen J Wolf
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-08-13

8.  Feedback With Performance Metric Scorecards Improves Resident Satisfaction but Does Not Impact Clinical Performance.

Authors:  Mira Mamtani; Frances S Shofer; Alexander Sackeim; Lauren Conlon; Kevin Scott; Angela M Mills
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-05-20

9.  Nurses' evaluation of physicians' non-clinical performance in emergency departments: advantages, disadvantages and lessons learned.

Authors:  Mohamad Alameddine; Afif Mufarrij; Miriam Saliba; Yara Mourad; Rima Jabbour; Eveline Hitti
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  "Who writes what?" Using written comments in team-based assessment to better understand medical student performance: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Jonathan Samuel White; Nishan Sharma
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.