| Literature DB >> 34429407 |
Todd M Everson1, Marta Vives-Usano2,3,4, Emie Seyve5, Johanna Lepeule5, Marie-France Hivert6,7, Mariona Bustamante8,9,10,11, Andres Cardenas6,12, Marina Lacasaña4,13,14, Jeffrey M Craig15,16,17, Corina Lesseur18, Emily R Baker19, Nora Fernandez-Jimenez20,21,22, Barbara Heude23, Patrice Perron24, Beatriz Gónzalez-Alzaga13,14, Jane Halliday16,25, Maya A Deyssenroth18, Margaret R Karagas26, Carmen Íñiguez4,27,28, Luigi Bouchard29, Pedro Carmona-Sáez30,31, Yuk J Loke15,16, Ke Hao32, Thalia Belmonte33, Marie A Charles23, Jordi Martorell-Marugán30,34, Evelyne Muggli16,25, Jia Chen18, Mariana F Fernández4,14,35, Jorg Tost36, Antonio Gómez-Martín37, Stephanie J London38, Jordi Sunyer3,4,39,40, Carmen J Marsit41,42.
Abstract
Maternal smoking during pregnancy (MSDP) contributes to poor birth outcomes, in part through disrupted placental functions, which may be reflected in the placental epigenome. Here we present a meta-analysis of the associations between MSDP and placental DNA methylation (DNAm) and between DNAm and birth outcomes within the Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics (PACE) consortium (N = 1700, 344 with MSDP). We identify 443 CpGs that are associated with MSDP, of which 142 associated with birth outcomes, 40 associated with gene expression, and 13 CpGs are associated with all three. Only two CpGs have consistent associations from a prior meta-analysis of cord blood DNAm, demonstrating substantial tissue-specific responses to MSDP. The placental MSDP-associated CpGs are enriched for environmental response genes, growth-factor signaling, and inflammation, which play important roles in placental function. We demonstrate links between placental DNAm, MSDP and poor birth outcomes, which may better inform the mechanisms through which MSDP impacts placental function and fetal growth.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34429407 PMCID: PMC8384884 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24558-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Frequencies of any and sustained MSDP within participating cohorts.
| Cohort | Country | Any MSDP | Sustained MSDP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Total | ||||||
| AQUA | Australia | 99 | 75 (75.76%) | 24 (24.24%) | — | — | — |
| EDEN | France | 647 | 446 (68.93%) | 201 (31.07%) | 570 | 446 (68.93%) | 124 (21.75%) |
| Gen3G | Canada | 151 | 138 (91.39%) | 13 (8.61%) | — | — | — |
| GENEIDA | Spain | 87 | 67 (77.01%) | 20 (22.99%) | 82 | 67 (77.01%) | 15 (18.29%) |
| INMA | Spain | 166 | 119 (71.69%) | 47 (28.31%) | 143 | 119 (71.69%) | 24 (16.78%) |
| NHBCS | USA | 310 | 290 (93.55%) | 20 (6.45%) | — | — | — |
| RICHS | USA | 240 | 221 (92.08%) | 19 (7.92%) | — | — | — |
| TOTAL | 1700 | 1356 (79.76%) | 344 (20.24%) | 795 | 632 (79.50%) | 163 (20.50%) | |
MSDP maternal smoking during pregnancy.
Fig. 1Volcano and Manhattan plots of the inverse-variance fixed meta-analysis results for any and sustained MSDP.
A Placental DNAm associations with any MSDP (total N = 1700 independent samples from seven independent studies; exposed = 344). B Placental DNAm associations with sustained MSDP (total N = 795 independent samples from three independent studies; exposed = 163). For both analyses, models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, putative cellular heterogeneity, and residual bias. In the volcano plots, the x-axes show the estimated mean difference in DNAm (effect size), when comparing mothers that smoked during pregnancy (MSDP) to those that did not, with a possible range between 0 and 1, while the x-axes in the Manhattan plots represent genomic location; both plots share the same y-axes with −log10(p values). Bonferroni thresholds for statistical significance are shown as blue dots and a blue horizontal line, for volcano and Manhattan plots, respectively. The y-axes were truncated to a minimum p value of 1 × 10−30 (or maximum −log10(p) of 30), to allow for better visualization of the majority of our results.
Fig. 2Forest plots of cohort specific and inverse-variance fixed-effect meta-analysis estimates of associations between MSDP with placental DNAm.
Estimated differential DNAm (Mean Diff.) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) at A cg27402634, B cg26843110, C cg20340720, and D cg17823829 with any MSDP and sustained MSDP. All models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, putative cellular heterogeneity, and for residual bias. The mean difference represents the estimated difference in the proportion of DNAm at each CpG when comparing mothers that smoked during pregnancy (MSDP), to those that did not smoke during pregnancy via linear regression.
Top 20 meta-analysis results from models of any and sustained MSDP.
| Annotations | Any MSDP | Sustained MSDP | % Diff. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CpG ID | Location | Gene (region) | |||||
| cg25112191 | chr1:151804260 | 0.021 | 3.56E−15 | 0.033 | 7.22E−21 | 55.1 | |
| cg17823829 | chr1:202765754 | 0.062 | 6.29E−19 | 0.089 | 2.74E−23 | 44.8 | |
| cg26045080 | chr1:36807363 | 0.026 | 5.26E−17 | 0.034 | 8.48E−18 | 30.4 | |
| cg00534380 | chr2:101766586 | −0.043 | 5.85E−19 | −0.058 | 1.66E−20 | 35.7 | |
| cg19246018 | chr2:240031588 | 0.016 | 6.93E−18 | 0.017 | 1.86E−16 | 5.6 | |
| cg06202585 | chr2:38325802 | 2p22.2 | −0.009 | 1.08E−16 | −0.009 | 1.78E−06 | 0.1 |
| cg23752985 | chr2:85803571 | −0.018 | 1.30E−14 | −0.023 | 2.51E−11 | 28.7 | |
| cg00666842 | chr2:88366145 | 0.031 | 5.84E−17 | 0.049 | 3.35E−27 | 57.2 | |
| cg27402634 | chr3:156536860 | 3q25.31 | −0.233 | 8.85E−99 | −0.251 | 2.20E−130 | 7.5 |
| cg09491670 | chr4:53529646 | 4q12 | 0.015 | 3.71E−15 | 0.022 | 1.06E−22 | 45.1 |
| cg25585967 | chr5:14452105 | 0.040 | 3.50E−15 | 0.062 | 5.97E−19 | 54.8 | |
| cg14214914 | chr9:131870304 | 0.037 | 4.84E−18 | 0.052 | 1.21E−21 | 39.1 | |
| cg20340720 | chr10:104512523 | −0.052 | 4.44E−30 | −0.074 | 1.87E−41 | 41.3 | |
| cg26648103 | chr11:66791718 | −0.033 | 3.29E−16 | −0.042 | 2.06E−15 | 28.4 | |
| cg26115089 | chr11:93846406 | 0.026 | 9.16E−25 | 0.033 | 1.53E−22 | 23.9 | |
| cg26843110 | chr15:74935742 | −0.054 | 1.05E−22 | −0.079 | 6.56E−26 | 46.3 | |
| cg26433445 | chr16:81764289 | 16q23.3 | 0.025 | 4.72E−17 | 0.035 | 8.84E−20 | 39.9 |
| cg24177452 | chr17:27494295 | 0.024 | 9.42E−15 | 0.032 | 2.55E−15 | 30.1 | |
| cg22018329 | chr19:3116716 | 0.041 | 1.41E−14 | 0.060 | 6.48E−17 | 45.6 | |
| cg03313447 | chr19:41829042 | −0.019 | 3.28E−16 | −0.027 | 2.70E−23 | 43.0 | |
All models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, education, putative cellular heterogeneity, and residual bias; CpGs that were not annotated with a gene name in the Illumina 450 K annotation file have been annotated with their genomic region (i.e., 2p22.2).
β coefficient of the association between DNAm and MSDP, which represent the estimated difference in the proportion of DNAm at each CpG when comparing mothers that smoked during pregnancy (MSDP), to those that did not smoke during pregnancy; p values from inverse-variance fixed-effect meta-analyses, % Diff. the percent difference in effect size when comparing the β1 for sustained MSDP to the β1 for any MSDP (% Diff.), MSDP maternal smoking during pregnancy.
Results from eQTM models, DNAm versus GA at birth, and DNAm versus BW.
| CpG ID | eQTM gene | Ann. gene | eQTM | eQTM | GA | GA | BW | BW |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cg25112191 | −7.28 | 5.17E−05 | 0.49 | 4.59E−01 | −2.70 | |||
| cg17823829 | 0.39 | 2.99E−02 | −1.18 | −1.02 | ||||
| cg26045080 | −2.43 | −1.41 | 4.19E−03 | −0.93 | 5.70E−02 | |||
| cg00534380 | −2.46 | 3.53 | 1.48 | 1.62E−04 | ||||
| cg19246018 | NA | 1.53 | 4.05E−01 | −1.39 | 1.74E−02 | −1.03 | 7.67E−02 | |
| cg06202585 | 2p22.2 | −12.78 | 3.09E−03 | 2.23 | 5.94E−02 | 1.53 | 1.97E−01 | |
| cg23752985 | 4.23 | 3.24E−03 | 5.47 | −0.31 | 6.62E−01 | |||
| cg00666842 | NA | −1.27 | 6.78E−02 | 0.45 | 2.94E−01 | −0.44 | 3.07E−01 | |
| cg27402634 | 3q25.31 | −2.34 | 3.41E−04 | −0.28 | 1.41E−01 | 0.92 | ||
| cg09491670 | 4q12 | −3.72 | −0.88 | 2.22E−01 | −0.65 | 3.64E−01 | ||
| cg25585967 | NA | 0.95 | 1.54E−01 | −0.97 | 8.64E-03 | −1.35 | 2.06E−04 | |
| cg14214914 | −3.20 | −0.96 | 1.35E−02 | −0.23 | 5.49E−01 | |||
| cg20340720 | −0.69 | 2.81E−03 | 0.49 | 1.88E−01 | 1.86 | |||
| cg26648103 | −1.80 | 7.31E−03 | 1.06 | 1.29E−02 | 1.66 | |||
| cg26115089 | NA | −0.74 | 5.20E−01 | −1.10 | 4.43E−02 | −1.48 | 6.71E−03 | |
| cg26843110 | −1.08 | 1.18E−02 | 2.30 | 1.28 | 1.19E−04 | |||
| cg26433445 | NA | 16q23.3 | −0.51 | 4.40E−01 | −0.38 | 5.45E−01 | −2.99 | |
| cg24177452 | −0.66 | 2.36E−02 | −0.76 | 1.24E−01 | −0.74 | 1.29E−01 | ||
| cg22018329 | −0.71 | 3.78E−03 | −1.67 | −0.49 | 1.47E−01 | |||
| cg03313447 | −9.79 | −2.48 | 7.79E−04 | 2.29 | 1.58E−03 |
We present the regression coefficients and p values from the models of eQTMs, gestational age at birth, and birth weight, among the 20 CpGs presented in Table 2. CpGs were mapped to eQTM genes whose expression levels were associated with CpG DNAm levels (eQTM p value < 0.05) and to the annotated genes from the Illumina 450 K annotation file; CpGs that were not annotated with a gene name in the Illumina 450 K annotation file have been annotated with their genomic region (i.e., 2p22.2). Associations passing Bonferroni-correction are shown in bold.
β regression coefficients from linear models, in which mRNA expression (eQTM), gestational age (GA; inverse normal transformed), and birth weight (BW; z-scores) were regressed on DNAm at each CpG, while adjusting for confounders; p values (p) for eQTM results are from linear regression models, while p values (p) for GA and BW results are from inverse-variance fixed-effect meta-analysis, eQTM expression quantitative trait methylation.
Fig. 3Forest plots of the cohort specific and inverse-variance fixed-effect meta-analysis estimates of association between higher levels of placental DNAm with gestational age at birth and birth weight.
Estimated differences in gestational age at birth and birth weight z-scores (slope) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) associated with increasing levels of DNAm at A, B cg27402634, C, D cg26843110, E, F cg20340720, and G, H cg17823829. All models were adjusted for maternal age, parity, maternal education, and putative cellular heterogeneity. The slopes and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), represent the regression coefficients from linear models, in which gestational age (inverse normal transformed) and birth weight (z-scores) were regressed on DNAm at each CpG, while adjusting for confounders.
Comparing MSDP-associated CpGs from placenta to those from cord blood.
| CpG | Gene | Cord | Cord | Plac.any
| Plac.any
| Plac.sust.
| Plac.sust
| Dir. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cg06397161 | −0.008 | 3.44E−06 | 0.034 | 3.25E−14 | 0.046 | 6.66E−13 | −/+ | |
| cg07565956 | −0.006 | −0.014 | 6.20E−12 | −0.021 | 1.10E−12 | −/− | ||
| cg08327744 | −0.010 | 0.017 | 2.57E−08 | 0.022 | 2.26E−08 | −/+ | ||
| cg14351425 | 0.007 | 1.09E−06 | 0.027 | 2.27E−08 | 0.037 | 1.21E−08 | +/+ | |
| cg14541011 | −0.007 | 2.99E−07 | 0.019 | 2.17E−09 | 0.022 | 2.63E−07 | −/+ | |
| cg16704246 | −0.008 | 6.21E−07 | −0.017 | 4.03E−11 | −0.023 | 6.17E−10 | −/− | |
| cg23160522 | 0.006 | 2.33E−06 | −0.029 | 2.60E−07 | −0.042 | 2.48E−08 | +/− | |
| cg23680900 | 0.003 | −0.005 | 1.52E−03 | −0.016 | 6.88E−14 | +/− | ||
| cg25189904 | −0.024 | −0.014 | 3.80E−08 | −0.019 | 1.64E−09 | −/− |
We present the meta-analysis results for CpGs among our 443 MSDP-associated CpGs that were also associated with MSDP in cord blood (from a published PACE meta-analysis[10]) with p values < 1E−05; those that passed a Bonferroni-corrected threshold in the cord blood study are highlighted in bold.
β1 coefficient of the association between DNAm and MSDP, which represent the estimated difference in the proportion of DNAm at each CpG when comparing mothers that smoked during pregnancy (MSDP), to those that did not smoke during pregnancy; p values are from inverse-variance fixed-effect meta-analysis, MSDP maternal smoking during pregnancy, Dir. direction of effect first for cord blood, then for placenta, Plac. results from placental tissue.