| Literature DB >> 22005006 |
Charlotte S Wilhelm-Benartzi1, E Andres Houseman, Matthew A Maccani, Graham M Poage, Devin C Koestler, Scott M Langevin, Luc A Gagne, Carolyn E Banister, James F Padbury, Carmen J Marsit.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fetal programming describes the theory linking environmental conditions during embryonic and fetal development with risk of diseases later in life. Environmental insults in utero may lead to changes in epigenetic mechanisms potentially affecting fetal development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22005006 PMCID: PMC3279448 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103927
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Repeat element methylation markers grouped by in utero exposures.
| Group mean ± SD | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exposure | LINE-1 | AluYb8 | Array-based methylation | |||||
| Sex | ||||||||
| Male | 190 | 51.7 ± 4.4 | 65.3 ± 3.3 | 0.238 ± 0.012 | ||||
| Female | 190 | 51.7 ± 4.9 | 64.6 ± 3.3 | 0.237 ± 0.013 | ||||
| 0.90 | 0.04 | 0.28 | ||||||
| Maternal ethnicity | ||||||||
| Caucasian | 217 | 51.4 ± 4.5 | 64.9 ± 3.3 | 0.239 ± 0.013 | ||||
| Non-Caucasian | 163 | 52.0 ± 4.8 | 65.1 ± 3.3 | 0.236 ± 0.011 | ||||
| 0.21 | 0.47 | 0.17 | ||||||
| Maternal tobacco use during pregnancy | ||||||||
| Yes | 36 | 52.9 ± 4.7 | 66.2 ± 2.3 | 0.240 ± 0.011 | ||||
| No | 343 | 51.6 ± 4.6 | 64.8 ± 3.4 | 0.237 ± 0.012 | ||||
| 0.10 | < 0.01 | 0.31 | ||||||
| Maternal alcohol use during pregnancy | ||||||||
| Yes | 3 | 55.0 ± 1.0 | 66.0 ± 3.4 | 0.230 ± 0.001 | ||||
| No | 377 | 51.7 ± 4.6 | 65.0 ± 3.3 | 0.238 ± 0.012 | ||||
| 0.02 | 0.66 | 0.51 | ||||||
| Maternal prenatal vitamin use during pregnancy | ||||||||
| Yes | 314 | 51.8 ± 4.6 | 65.0 ± 3.3 | 0.238 ± 0.012 | ||||
| No | 66 | 51.3 ± 4.7 | 64.6 ± 3.4 | 0.238 ± 0.014 | ||||
| 0.50 | 0.29 | 0.80 | ||||||
Associations between infant growth and repetitive element methylation.
| Covariate ( | Linear regression effect estimate (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean LINE-1 (per 10%) | 9.7 (2.9, 16.6) | 0.01 | ||
| Infant sex | 12.81 (6.54, 19.09) | < 0.0001 | ||
| White maternal ethnicity | 7.06 (0.59, 13.53) | 0.03 | ||
| Mean AluYb8 (per 10%) | 14.5 (4.9, 24.0) | < 0.0001 | ||
| Infant sex | 12.05 (5.76, 18.33) | < 0.0001 | ||
| White maternal ethnicity | 6.91 (0.46, 13.36) | 0.04 | ||
| All models were also adjusted for maternal age, BMI before pregnancy, tobacco, alcohol, and prenatal vitamin use during pregnancy. Infant sex uses female sex as the referent. | ||||
Figure 1Association of LINE-1 (A) and AluYb8 (B) methylation with mean RPMM class methylation. The colored dots indicate the degree of average CpG class methylation, as indicated by the key. The red dashed lines represent the null limits for the permutation distribution of regression coefficient t-statistics (t-stat), adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Figure 2Frequency of sequence features associated with RPMM class CpG loci: percentage of CpG loci found in LINE-1 (A), LINE-2 (B), Alu (C), and MIR (D), within a CGI (E), or having the associated gene considered a PcG protein target gene (F). The colored dots indicate the degree of average class methylation.
Figure 3Association of LINE-1 (A) and AluYb8 (B) methylation with bioinformatically derived CpG class methylation. The colored dots indicate the degree of average class methylation. The red dashed lines represent the null limits for the permutation distribution of regression coefficient t-statistics (t-stat), adjusted for multiple comparisons.