Literature DB >> 35061043

Analysis of Preconception Paternal Smoking and Neonatal Outcomes.

Jennifer Horwitz1, Shi Wu Wen2, Hongzhuan Tan3, Shujin Zhou4, Chang Ye1, Minxue Shen2, Ravi Retnakaran1,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35061043      PMCID: PMC8783264          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

There is growing emphasis on optimizing maternal health before conception to improve offspring outcomes, as per the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease paradigm.[1] However, there has been little analogous consideration of paternal health at conception, despite growing evidence linking paternal exposures to offspring health.[2] Indeed, the emerging Paternal Origins of Health and Disease (POHaD) paradigm posits that factors, such as paternal age and weight, can modify the sperm epigenome, yielding epigenetic changes that are maintained in the offspring, in whom they may affect gene regulation and physiology.[2] In this context, smoking is an exposure of interest because maternal smoking in pregnancy is associated with placental DNA methylation and adverse neonatal outcomes, such as low birth weight and preterm birth.[3] Moreover, tobacco smoke may affect the sperm genome and epigenome.[4] However, little is known about the potential impact of preconception paternal smoking. Thus, we sought to prospectively evaluate the associations of preconception paternal smoking with neonatal outcomes.

Methods

This cohort study was approved by the research ethics boards of Central South University in Changsha, China, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute in Ottawa, Canada, and Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, Canada. All participants provided written informed consent. This study has been reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. In this prospective preconception observational cohort study, we recruited newly married couples in Liuyang, China, that intended to conceive within 6 months. The protocol has been described in detail.[5,6] Between February 1, 2009, and November 4, 2015, both partners underwent baseline (pregravid) assessment and were monitored throughout pregnancy. Associations of paternal smoking with birth weight and categorical neonatal outcomes were assessed by multiple linear regression and logistic regression analyses, respectively, with P < .05 considered significant. We used t tests to evaluate the P values for the multiple linear regression analyses and χ2 tests to calculate P values for multiple logistic regression analyses. All tests were 2-sided, and all analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System version 9.4 (SAS Institute). Statistical analyses were done between January 2021 and August 2021.

Results

The study population consisted of 1174 couples who underwent baseline assessment at median of 23.3 (IQR, 5.6-65.6) weeks before a singleton pregnancy. The mean (SD) age of the sample was 24 (3.0) years for women and 26 (3.5) years for men. At preconception assessment, 538 male partners (45.8%) reported currently smoking, in contrast to only 5 women (0.4%) doing so. The Table shows pregravid characteristics and delivery outcomes of the couples, stratified into 3 groups based on the degree of paternal smoking before conception: none (636 [54.2%]); 1 to 10 cigarettes per day inclusive (343 [29.2%]); and more than 10 cigarettes per day (195 [16.6%]). Birth weight and length of gestation did not differ between the groups.
Table.

Characteristics of Study Population Before Pregnancy and at Delivery, Stratified Into 3 Strata of Paternal Smoking Prior to Conception

Pregravid characteristicsParticipants, No. (%)P value
No smoking (n = 636)1-10 cigarettes/d (n = 343)>10 cigarettes/d (n = 195)
Weeks before conception, median (IQR), wk20.9 (4.6-63.1)27.1 (6.6-75.8)24.7 (7.7-67.7).13
Age, median (IQR), y
Maternal24 (22-26)23 (22-25)24 (22-26).06
Paternal25 (24-27)25 (23-28)27 (24-29).001
Education, median (IQR), y
Maternal12 (9-12)9 (9-12)9 (9-12).001
Paternal9 (9-12)9 (9-12)9 (9-12).009
Household income, 1000 yuan, median (IQR)20 (15-30)20 (10-30)20 (8-30)<.0001
Maternal smoking4 (0.6)01 (0.5).34
BMI, mean (SD)
Maternal20.2 (2.4)20.1 (2.4)20.3 (2.4).74
Paternal22.1 (2.5)21.8 (2.7)22.3 (2.9).09
Waist circumference, mean (SD), cm
Maternal70.7 (7.6)70.4 (7.7)70.6 (7.1).81
Paternal74.7 (7.6)75.5 (8.6)76.0 (10.5).11
At delivery
Length of gestation, mean (SD), wk39.0 (1.4)39.0 (1.5)39.0 (1.2).92
Total gestational weight gain, mean (SD), kg17.2 (6.5)16.9 (6.1)17.0 (5.4).80
Gestational diabetes13 (2.0)9 (2.6)2 (1.0).50
Preeclampsia7 (1.1)9 (2.6)3 (1.5).19
Cesarean delivery247 (39.0)119 (35.0)76 (39.0).44
1-min Apgar <713 (2.1)10 (2.9)3 (1.6).59
Male infant335 (52.7)176 (51.3)91 (46.7).34
Birth weight, mean (SD), g3295 (445)3258 (478)3260 (425).40
Adverse delivery outcomes
Preterm delivery23 (3.6)21 (6.1)6 (3.1).12
Low birth weight21 (3.3)14 (4.1)8 (4.1).77
SGA49 (7.7)30 (8.8)18 (9.2).73
LGA78 (12.3)37 (10.8)17 (8.7).37

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; LGA, large for gestational age; SGA, small for gestational age.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared; LGA, large for gestational age; SGA, small for gestational age. In the multiple linear regression analysis, positive independent factors associated with birth weight were maternal pregravid body mass index (BMI), calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, (regression coefficient, 39.2; 95% CI, 27.5 to 50.9; P < .001), paternal pregravid BMI (regression coefficient, 17.0; 95% CI, 7.7 to 26.3; P = .001), maternal age (regression coefficient, 14.4; 95% CI, 2.7 to 26.1; P = .02), length of gestation (regression coefficient, 128.7; 95% CI, 108.4 to 149.0; P < .001), gestational weight gain (regression coefficient, 16.5; 95% CI, 12.3 to 20.8; P < .0001), and male neonate (regression coefficient, 89.1; 95% CI, 36.2 to 142.1; P = .001), while preeclampsia was associated with lower birth weight (regression coefficient, −214.0; 95% CI, −422.9 to −5.1; P = .04). Neither maternal nor paternal smoking were associated with lower birth weight. Despite much higher prevalence, preconception paternal smoking was not associated with birth weight (P = .37). There was no significant interaction between paternal BMI and smoking status. On logistic regression analyses (Figure), neither paternal smoking exposure of 1 to 10 cigarettes per day nor smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day was associated with preterm delivery, low birth weight, small-for-gestational-age, or large-for-gestational-age.
Figure.

Adjusted Odds Ratios for Association of Pregravid Paternal Smoking of 1 to 10 Cigarettes Per Day and More Than 10 Cigarettes Per Day With Adverse Delivery Outcomes

Each model is adjusted for pregravid paternal body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, pregravid maternal body mass index, gestational weight gain, pregravid maternal smoking, and preeclampsia.

Adjusted Odds Ratios for Association of Pregravid Paternal Smoking of 1 to 10 Cigarettes Per Day and More Than 10 Cigarettes Per Day With Adverse Delivery Outcomes

Each model is adjusted for pregravid paternal body mass index, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared, pregravid maternal body mass index, gestational weight gain, pregravid maternal smoking, and preeclampsia.

Discussion

Previous studies have focused on paternal smoking during pregnancy as an indicator of passive maternal exposure rather than prior to conception as per the POHaD paradigm. In contrast, we have prospectively evaluated paternal smoking before conception in a population showing marked disparity in smoking rates between women and men, which enables isolated evaluation of paternal smoking. This study was limited because maternal passive smoke exposure was not assessed; however, our prospective evaluation of paternal smoking before conception does not reveal associations with birth weight or adverse neonatal outcomes at delivery. These findings cannot rule out the possibility that POHaD programming effects of preconception paternal smoking may yet emerge later in life.
  6 in total

1.  Association of Timing of Weight Gain in Pregnancy With Infant Birth Weight.

Authors:  Ravi Retnakaran; Shi Wu Wen; Hongzhuan Tan; Shujin Zhou; Chang Ye; Minxue Shen; Graeme N Smith; Mark C Walker
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 2.  From sperm to offspring: Assessing the heritable genetic consequences of paternal smoking and potential public health impacts.

Authors:  Marc A Beal; Carole L Yauk; Francesco Marchetti
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 5.657

3.  Placental DNA methylation signatures of maternal smoking during pregnancy and potential impacts on fetal growth.

Authors:  Todd M Everson; Marta Vives-Usano; Emie Seyve; Johanna Lepeule; Marie-France Hivert; Mariona Bustamante; Andres Cardenas; Marina Lacasaña; Jeffrey M Craig; Corina Lesseur; Emily R Baker; Nora Fernandez-Jimenez; Barbara Heude; Patrice Perron; Beatriz Gónzalez-Alzaga; Jane Halliday; Maya A Deyssenroth; Margaret R Karagas; Carmen Íñiguez; Luigi Bouchard; Pedro Carmona-Sáez; Yuk J Loke; Ke Hao; Thalia Belmonte; Marie A Charles; Jordi Martorell-Marugán; Evelyne Muggli; Jia Chen; Mariana F Fernández; Jorg Tost; Antonio Gómez-Martín; Stephanie J London; Jordi Sunyer; Carmen J Marsit
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  POHaD: why we should study future fathers.

Authors:  Adelheid Soubry
Journal:  Environ Epigenet       Date:  2018-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.