Literature DB >> 3442406

The limits of ascertainment.

W J Ewens1, N C Shute.   

Abstract

The concept of a proband, and a formula frequently used to give the probability that a family with r affected children has t probands, have led to frequently used, but incorrect, 'limits of ascertainment' in estimation problems involving ascertainment sampling. Data suggesting a sampling scheme outside these incorrect limits are discussed. An estimation procedure not using the proband concept is available which is not bounded by the incorrect limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3442406     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1986.tb01760.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  10 in total

1.  Estimation of sibling recurrence-risk ratio under single ascertainment in two-child families.

Authors:  P Wickramaratne; S Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Likelihood formulation of parent-of-origin effects on segregation analysis, including ascertainment.

Authors:  Fatemeh Haghighi; Susan E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Ascertainment-adjusted parameter estimates revisited.

Authors:  Michael P Epstein; Xihong Lin; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  A cooperative binomial ascertainment model.

Authors:  E Kh Ginsburg; T I Axenovich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Segregation analysis with uncertain ascertainment: application to Fanconi anemia.

Authors:  A Rogatko; A D Auerbach
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The essence of single ascertainment.

Authors:  S E Hodge; V J Vieland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Comparing observed average numbers of affected sibs with those expected under geometric ascertainment bias in an extended range in both simplex and multiple sibships.

Authors:  K H Sit
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem. III. Pedigrees.

Authors:  N C Shute; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Correcting for single ascertainment by truncation for a quantitative trait.

Authors:  M R Young; M Boehnke; P P Moll
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  HLA-sharing, recurrent spontaneous abortion, and the genetic hypothesis.

Authors:  P W Hedrick
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.