Literature DB >> 8913762

The essence of single ascertainment.

S E Hodge1, V J Vieland.   

Abstract

We propose a fundamental new definition of single ascertainment, namely, that single ascertainment is any ascertainment scheme in which P[pedigree is ascertained/true structure of pedigree] alpha p(theta), where p(theta) is some function of genetic parameters theta but is not a function of pedigree structure. Stated in words: Under single ascertainment, all pedigrees have equal (or proportional with respect to genetic parameters) probabilities of being ascertained, independent of pedigree size or structure. This new definition of single ascertainment allows us to show several results: (1) The correct likelihood consists of the probability of the data conditioned on the observed pedigree, divided by the function p(theta), whether sampling is "proband-independent" or "proband-dependent." (2) More-familiar definitions of single ascertainment all represent special cases of our definition. (3) When p(theta) represents the prevalence of the trait being studied, our definition corresponds to "classical" single ascertainment, i.e., ascertainment through a single "proband." However, the concept of p(theta) can also be generalized to represent the population frequency of configurations of affected relatives (such as affected sib pairs); we call this "generalized single ascertainment."

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8913762      PMCID: PMC1207613     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

1.  Genetic tests under incomplete ascertainment.

Authors:  N E MORTON
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1959-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Expression of active domains of a human folate-dependent trifunctional enzyme in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D W Hum; R E MacKenzie
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1991-04

3.  Assumptions for different ascertainment models in human genetics.

Authors:  J S Williams; J Stene
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A resolution of the ascertainment sampling problem: IV. Continuous phenotypes.

Authors:  W J Ewens; R M Green
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  The effect of proband designation on segregation analysis.

Authors:  D A Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Sampling considerations in the gathering and analysis of pedigree data.

Authors:  R C Elston; E Sobel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Ascertainment in the sequential sampling of pedigrees.

Authors:  C Cannings; E A Thompson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Sampling schemes and ascertainment.

Authors:  E A Thompson; C Cannings
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1979

9.  'Twixt cup and lip: how intractable is the ascertainment problem?

Authors:  R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Choice of ascertainment model II. Discrimination between multi-proband models by means of birth order data.

Authors:  J Stene
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 1.670

View more
  7 in total

1.  Estimation of sibling recurrence-risk ratio under single ascertainment in two-child families.

Authors:  P Wickramaratne; S Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Likelihood formulation of parent-of-origin effects on segregation analysis, including ascertainment.

Authors:  Fatemeh Haghighi; Susan E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Computer simulation is an undervalued tool for genetic analysis: a historical view and presentation of SHIMSHON--a Web-based genetic simulation package.

Authors:  David A Greenberg
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 4.  A review of statistical methods for testing genetic anticipation: looking for an answer in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Philip S Boonstra; Stephen B Gruber; Victoria M Raymond; Shu-Chen Huang; Susanne Timshel; Mef Nilbert; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  Statistical evaluation of age-at-onset anticipation: a new test and evaluation of its behavior in realistic applications.

Authors:  V J Vieland; J Huang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Estimation of Trait-Model Parameters in a MOD Score Linkage Analysis.

Authors:  Markus Brugger; Susanne Rospleszcz; Konstantin Strauch
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 0.444

7.  The TAGA Study: A Study of Factors Determining Aortic Diameter in Families at High Risk of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Reveal Two New Candidate Genes.

Authors:  Olga Peypoch; Ferran Paüls-Vergés; Miquel Vázquez-Santiago; Jaime Dilme; Jose Romero; Jordi Giner; Vicente Plaza; Jose Roman Escudero; Jose Manuel Soria; Mercedes Camacho; Maria Sabater-Lleal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.