Literature DB >> 34415571

Individual- and neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and risk of aggressive breast cancer subtypes in a pooled cohort of women from Kaiser Permanente Northern California.

Rhonda-Lee F Aoki1, Stephen P Uong1, Scarlett Lin Gomez2, Stacey E Alexeeff1, Bette J Caan1, Lawrence H Kushi1, Jacqueline M Torres2, Alice Guan2, Alison J Canchola2, Brittany N Morey3, Katherine Lin2, Candyce H Kroenke1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with a higher risk of aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtypes, but few studies have examined the independent effects of both neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (nSES) and individual-level SES measures.
METHODS: This study included 5547 women from the Pathways and Life After Cancer Epidemiology cohorts who were diagnosed with invasive BC. Generalized estimating equation models were used to examine associations of nSES (a composite score based on income, poverty, education, occupation, employment, rent, and house value) and individual-level SES (income and education) with BC subtypes: luminal B (LumB), Her2-enriched (Her2-e), and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) relative to luminal A (LumA). Models controlled for age, race, nativity, stage, days from diagnosis to survey, and study cohort and simultaneously for nSES and individual-level SES.
RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, low nSES was significantly associated with the LumB (odds ratio for quartile 1 vs quartile 4 [ORQ1vQ4 ], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.54; P for trend = .005) and TNBC subtypes (ORQ1vQ4 , 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.71; P for trend = .037) relative to LumA. Conversely, individual education was significantly associated with only the Her2-e subtype (odds ratio for high school degree or less vs postgraduate, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.03-2.75; P for trend = .030) relative to LumA. Individual income was not significantly associated with any BC subtype.
CONCLUSIONS: nSES and individual-level SES are independently associated with different BC subtypes; specifically, low nSES and individual-level education are independent predictors of more aggressive BC subtypes relative to LumA.
© 2021 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  California; breast neoplasms; estrogen receptors; progesterone receptor; social class; women

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34415571      PMCID: PMC8997171          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  32 in total

Review 1.  Disproportionate exposures in environmental justice and other populations: the importance of outliers.

Authors:  Michael Gochfeld; Joanna Burger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Residential mobility in the California Teachers Study: implications for geographic differences in disease rates.

Authors:  Susan E Hurley; Peggy Reynolds; Debbie E Goldberg; Andrew Hertz; Hoda Anton-Culver; Leslie Bernstein; Dennis Deapen; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Ronald K Ross; Dee West; William E Wright; Argyrios Ziogas; Pamela L Horn-Ross
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Differences in Breast Cancer Survival by Molecular Subtypes in the United States.

Authors:  Nadia Howlader; Kathleen A Cronin; Allison W Kurian; Rebecca Andridge
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Metallic air pollutants and breast cancer heterogeneity.

Authors:  Jacob K Kresovich; Serap Erdal; Hua Yun Chen; Peter H Gann; Maria Argos; Garth H Rauscher
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry.

Authors:  Katrina R Bauer; Monica Brown; Rosemary D Cress; Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours.

Authors:  C M Perou; T Sørlie; M B Eisen; M van de Rijn; S S Jeffrey; C A Rees; J R Pollack; D T Ross; H Johnsen; L A Akslen; O Fluge; A Pergamenschikov; C Williams; S X Zhu; P E Lønning; A L Børresen-Dale; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Socioeconomic disparities and breast cancer hormone receptor status.

Authors:  Abegail A Andaya; Lindsey Enewold; Marie-Josèphe Horner; Ismail Jatoi; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Life After Cancer Epidemiology (LACE) Study: a cohort of early stage breast cancer survivors (United States).

Authors:  Bette Caan; Barbara Sternfeld; Erica Gunderson; Ashley Coates; Charles Quesenberry; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 9.  Reproductive behaviors and risk of developing breast cancer according to tumor subtype: A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Matteo Lambertini; Luigi Santoro; Lucia Del Mastro; Bastien Nguyen; Luca Livraghi; Donatella Ugolini; Fedro A Peccatori; Hatem A Azim
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 10.  Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kristin N Anderson; Richard B Schwab; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  2 in total

1.  Racial disparities in triple negative breast cancer: toward a causal architecture approach.

Authors:  Scott D Siegel; Madeline M Brooks; Shannon M Lynch; Jennifer Sims-Mourtada; Zachary T Schug; Frank C Curriero
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 8.408

2.  Occupational Factors and Socioeconomic Differences in Breast Cancer Risk and Stage at Diagnosis in Swiss Working Women.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Bulliard; Nicolas Bovio; Patrick Arveux; Yvan Bergeron; Arnaud Chiolero; Evelyne Fournier; Simon Germann; Isabelle Konzelmann; Manuela Maspoli; Elisabetta Rapiti; Irina Guseva Canu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.