Literature DB >> 15652686

Residential mobility in the California Teachers Study: implications for geographic differences in disease rates.

Susan E Hurley1, Peggy Reynolds, Debbie E Goldberg, Andrew Hertz, Hoda Anton-Culver, Leslie Bernstein, Dennis Deapen, David Peel, Richard Pinder, Ronald K Ross, Dee West, William E Wright, Argyrios Ziogas, Pamela L Horn-Ross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Especially for cancers with long latency periods, such as breast cancer, the issue of residential mobility hinders ecologic analyses seeking to examine the role of environmental contaminants in chronic disease etiology. This study describes and evaluates characteristics associated with residential mobility in a sub-sample of the California Teachers Study (CTS) cohort.
METHODS: In 2000, lifetime residential histories were collected for a sub-sample of 328 women enrolled in the CTS; women's degree of residential mobility and associated factors were analyzed.
RESULTS: While most women moved many times during their lives (average = 8.9), the average number of years at their residence when they enrolled in the study was reasonably long (15.1 years). Age strongly predicted duration at current residence but was not related to the number of lifetime residences. After adjusting for age, California-born women and women living in high socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhoods were significantly more residentially stable. Agreement between self-reported urbanization of recent residences and that based on census data of the geocoded residences was very good (80% concordant). Among women currently living in urban areas, an average of 43.3 years, or 77%, of their lifetimes were spent in urban residences; among women currently living in a rural area, an average of 37.3 years, or 67% of their lifetimes were spent in rural residences.
CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that analyses of incidence rates based on current residence, while not capturing a woman's full exposure history, may reasonably reflect some aspect of longer term chronic exposures, especially those related to urbanization, at least in professional women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15652686     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  Adulthood residential ultraviolet radiation, sun sensitivity, dietary vitamin D, and risk of lymphoid malignancies in the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Ellen T Chang; Alison J Canchola; Myles Cockburn; Yani Lu; Sophia S Wang; Leslie Bernstein; Christina A Clarke; Pamela L Horn-Ross
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Accuracy of commercially available residential histories for epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Jacquez; Melissa J Slotnick; Jaymie R Meliker; Gillian AvRuskin; Glenn Copeland; Jerome Nriagu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Individual- and neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and risk of aggressive breast cancer subtypes in a pooled cohort of women from Kaiser Permanente Northern California.

Authors:  Rhonda-Lee F Aoki; Stephen P Uong; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Stacey E Alexeeff; Bette J Caan; Lawrence H Kushi; Jacqueline M Torres; Alice Guan; Alison J Canchola; Brittany N Morey; Katherine Lin; Candyce H Kroenke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Spatiotemporal air pollution exposure assessment for a Canadian population-based lung cancer case-control study.

Authors:  Perry Hystad; Paul A Demers; Kenneth C Johnson; Jeff Brook; Aaron van Donkelaar; Lok Lamsal; Randall Martin; Michael Brauer
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Lifetime residential mobility history and self-rated health at midlife.

Authors:  Kuan-Chia Lin; Hui-Chuan Huang; Ya-Mei Bai; Pei-Chun Kuo
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.211

6.  Estimating healthcare mobility in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Authors:  Karen H Wang; Joseph L Goulet; Constance M Carroll; Melissa Skanderson; Samah Fodeh; Joseph Erdos; Julie A Womack; Erica A Abel; Harini Bathulapalli; Amy C Justice; Marcella Nunez-Smith; Cynthia A Brandt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Impact of Neighborhood Social and Built Environment on Breast Cancer Risk: The Neighborhoods and Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Shannon M Conroy; Salma Shariff-Marco; Jocelyn Koo; Juan Yang; Theresa H M Keegan; Meera Sangaramoorthy; Andrew Hertz; David O Nelson; Myles Cockburn; William A Satariano; Irene H Yen; Ninez A Ponce; Esther M John; Scarlett Lin Gomez
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.090

8.  Residential proximity to agricultural pesticide use and incidence of breast cancer in California, 1988-1997.

Authors:  Peggy Reynolds; Susan E Hurley; Robert B Gunier; Sauda Yerabati; Thu Quach; Andrew Hertz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Assessment of demographic and perinatal predictors of non-response and impact of non-response on measures of association in a population-based case control study: findings from the Georgia Study to Explore Early Development.

Authors:  Laura A Schieve; Shericka Harris; Matthew J Maenner; Aimee Alexander; Nicole F Dowling
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-16

10.  Home mortgage discrimination and incidence of triple-negative and Luminal A breast cancer among non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White females in California, 2006-2015.

Authors:  Eli K Michaels; Alison J Canchola; Kirsten M M Beyer; Yuhong Zhou; Salma Shariff-Marco; Scarlett L Gomez
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.532

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.