Literature DB >> 24477977

Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature.

Kristin N Anderson1, Richard B Schwab, Maria Elena Martinez.   

Abstract

Aside from age, sex, and family history, risk of developing breast cancer is largely linked to reproductive factors, which characterize exposure to sex hormones. Given that, molecular testing at the tumor level is currently possible, clinical characterization of tumor subtypes is routinely conducted to guide treatment decisions. However, despite the vast amount of published data from observational studies on reproductive factor associations and breast cancer risk, relatively fewer reports have been published on associations specific to breast tumor subtypes. We conducted a review of the literature and summarized the results of associations between reproductive factors and risk or odds of three distinct tumor subtypes: estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive (hormone receptor positive, HR+ tumors), tumors overexpressing the human epidermal receptor 2 protein (HER2+), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), which lacks the three markers. Results show that the most consistent evidence for associations with reproductive risk factors exists for HR+ breast cancers, with nulliparity, current use of menopausal hormone therapy, and prolonged interval between menarche and age at first birth being the strongest risk factors; increased age at first birth and decreased age at menarche were fairly consistently associated with HR+ cancers; and though less consistent, older age at menopause was also positively associated, while lactation was inversely associated with HR+ tumors. Fewer consistent associations have been reported for TNBC. The single protective factor most consistently associated with TNBC was longer duration of breastfeeding. Increased parity, younger age at first birth, older age at menarche, and oral contraceptive use were less consistently shown to be associated with TNBC. No remarkable associations for HER2+ breast cancers were evident, although this was based on relatively scarce data. Findings suggest heterogeneity in reproductive risk factors for the distinct subtypes of breast tumors, which may have implications for recommended prevention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24477977      PMCID: PMC4026199          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2852-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  56 in total

1.  Pregnancies, breast-feeding, and breast cancer risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study (IBCCS).

Authors:  Nadine Andrieu; David E Goldgar; Douglas F Easton; Matti Rookus; Richard Brohet; Antonis C Antoniou; Susan Peock; Gareth Evans; Diana Eccles; Fiona Douglas; Catherine Noguès; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Agnès Chompret; Flora E Van Leeuwen; Irma Kluijt; Javier Benitez; Brita Arver; Edith Olah; Jenny Chang-Claude
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population-based study.

Authors:  Xiaohong R Yang; Mark E Sherman; David L Rimm; Jolanta Lissowska; Louise A Brinton; Beata Peplonska; Stephen M Hewitt; William F Anderson; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Alicja Bardin-Mikolajczak; Witold Zatonski; Richard Cartun; Daniza Mandich; Grzegorz Rymkiewicz; Marcin Ligaj; Stanislaw Lukaszek; Radzisaw Kordek; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Compared with nibbling, neither gorging nor a morning fast affect short-term energy balance in obese patients in a chamber calorimeter.

Authors:  M A Taylor; J S Garrow
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-04

4.  Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry.

Authors:  Katrina R Bauer; Monica Brown; Rosemary D Cress; Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Reproductive and hormonal factors, family history, and breast cancer according to the hormonal receptor status.

Authors:  Valentina Rosato; Cristina Bosetti; Eva Negri; Renato Talamini; Luigino Dal Maso; Matteo Malvezzi; Fabio Falcini; Maurizio Montella; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Reproductive factors and risk of premenopausal breast cancer by age at diagnosis: are there differences before and after age 40?

Authors:  Erica T Warner; Graham A Colditz; Julie R Palmer; Ann H Partridge; Bernard A Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Variation in breast cancer risk associated with factors related to pregnancies according to truncating mutation location, in the French National BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carrier cohort (GENEPSO).

Authors:  Julie Lecarpentier; Catherine Noguès; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Christine Lasset; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Olivier Caron; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Pascaline Berthet; Laurence Faivre; Valérie Bonadona; Bruno Buecher; Isabelle Coupier; Laurence Gladieff; Paul Gesta; François Eisinger; Marc Frénay; Elisabeth Luporsi; Alain Lortholary; Chrystelle Colas; Catherine Dugast; Michel Longy; Pascal Pujol; Julie Tinat; Rosette Lidereau; Nadine Andrieu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer risk according to joint estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

Authors:  Huiyan Ma; Leslie Bernstein; Malcolm C Pike; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Reproductive factors and risk of hormone receptor positive and negative breast cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca Ritte; Kaja Tikk; Annekatrin Lukanova; Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Kim Overvad; Laure Dossus; Agnès Fournier; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Verena Grote; Heiner Boeing; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Antonia Trichopoulou; Pagona Lagiou; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Domenico Palli; Franco Berrino; Amalia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; José Ramón Quirós; Genevieve Buckland; Esther Molina-Montes; María-Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Pilar Amiano; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Carla H van Gils; Petra Hm Peeters; Nick Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Timothy J Key; Ruth C Travis; Elisabete Weiderpass; Vanessa Dumeaux; Eliv Lund; Malin Sund; Anne Andersson; Isabelle Romieu; Sabina Rinaldi; Paulo Vineis; Melissa A Merritt; Elio Riboli; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  130 in total

Review 1.  Night Shift Work and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Johnni Hansen
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

2.  A Pooled Analysis of Breastfeeding and Breast Cancer Risk by Hormone Receptor Status in Parous Hispanic Women.

Authors:  Meera Sangaramoorthy; Lisa M Hines; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Amanda I Phipps; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna H Wu; Jocelyn Koo; Sue A Ingles; Martha L Slattery; Esther M John
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Dietary index scores and invasive breast cancer risk among women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Joshua Petimar; Yong-Moon Mark Park; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Teresa T Fung; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 4.  Potential of breastmilk analysis to inform early events in breast carcinogenesis: rationale and considerations.

Authors:  Jeanne Murphy; Mark E Sherman; Eva P Browne; Ana I Caballero; Elizabeth C Punska; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Hannah P Yang; Maxwell Lee; Howard Yang; Gretchen L Gierach; Kathleen F Arcaro
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Black-White Breast Cancer Incidence Trends: Effects of Ethnicity.

Authors:  Brittny C Davis Lynn; Philip S Rosenberg; William F Anderson; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Interaction between APC and Fen1 during breast carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Satya Narayan; Aruna S Jaiswal; Brian K Law; Mohammad A Kamal; Arun K Sharma; Robert A Hromas
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-04-07

7.  Elevated risks of subsequent endometrial cancer development among breast cancer survivors with different hormone receptor status: a SEER analysis.

Authors:  Jieqiong Liu; Wen Jiang; Kai Mao; Yi An; Fengxi Su; Betty Y S Kim; Qiang Liu; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Differential Patterns of Risk Factors for Early-Onset Breast Cancer by ER Status in African American Women.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bertrand; Traci N Bethea; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Lynn Rosenberg; Julie R Palmer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Breast cancer in Portugal: Temporal trends and age-specific incidence by geographic regions.

Authors:  Gonçalo Forjaz de Lacerda; Scott P Kelly; Joana Bastos; Clara Castro; Alexandra Mayer; Angela B Mariotto; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Increased risk of tumor in DM1 is not related to exposure to common lifestyle risk factors.

Authors:  Maria Laura Ester Bianchi; Emanuele Leoncini; Marcella Masciullo; Anna Modoni; Shahinaz M Gadalla; Roberto Massa; Emanuele Rastelli; Chiara Terracciano; Giovanni Antonini; Elisabetta Bucci; Antonio Petrucci; Sandro Costanzi; Massimo Santoro; Stefania Boccia; Gabriella Silvestri
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.