Literature DB >> 34411308

Light-responsive and Protic Ruthenium Compounds Bearing Bathophenanthroline and Dihydroxybipyridine Ligands Achieve Nanomolar Toxicity towards Breast Cancer Cells.

Olaitan E Oladipupo1, Spenser R Brown2, Robert W Lamb3,4, Jessica L Gray1, Colin G Cameron5, Alexa R DeRegnaucourt1, Nicholas A Ward1, James Fletcher Hall1, Yifei Xu1, Courtney M Petersen1, Fengrui Qu1, Ambar B Shrestha1, Matthew K Thompson1, Marco Bonizzoni1, Charles Edwin Webster3, Sherri A McFarland5, Yonghyun Kim2, Elizabeth T Papish1.   

Abstract

We report new ruthenium complexes bearing the lipophilic bathophenanthroline (BPhen) ligand and dihydroxybipyridine (dhbp) ligands which differ in the placement of the OH groups ([(BPhen)2 Ru(n,n'-dhbp)]Cl2 with n = 6 and 4 in 1A and 2A , respectively). Full characterization data are reported for 1A and 2A and single crystal X-ray diffraction for 1A . Both 1A and 2A are diprotic acids. We have studied 1A , 1B , 2A , and 2B (B = deprotonated forms) by UV-vis spectroscopy and 1 photodissociates, but 2 is light stable. Luminescence studies reveal that the basic forms have lower energy 3 MLCT states relative to the acidic forms. Complexes 1A and 2A produce singlet oxygen with quantum yields of 0.05 and 0.68, respectively, in acetonitrile. Complexes 1 and 2 are both photocytotoxic toward breast cancer cells, with complex 2 showing EC50 light values as low as 0.50 μM with PI values as high as >200 vs. MCF7. Computational studies were used to predict the energies of the 3 MLCT and 3 MC states. An inaccessible 3 MC state for 2B suggests a rationale for why photodissociation does not occur with the 4,4'-dhbp ligand. Low dark toxicity combined with an accessible 3 MLCT state for 1 O2 generation explains the excellent photocytotoxicity of 2.
© 2021 American Society for Photobiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34411308      PMCID: PMC8810589          DOI: 10.1111/php.13508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  53 in total

1.  A comparison between Sypro Ruby and ruthenium II tris (bathophenanthroline disulfonate) as fluorescent stains for protein detection in gels.

Authors:  T Rabilloud; J M Strub; S Luche; A van Dorsselaer; J Lunardi
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Cellular uptake of protic ruthenium complexes is influenced by pH dependent passive diffusion and energy dependent efflux.

Authors:  Seungjo Park; Jessica L Gray; Sarah D Altman; Angela R Hairston; Brianna T Beswick; Yonghyun Kim; Elizabeth T Papish
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.155

3.  Photoactivated inhibition of cathepsin K in a 3D tumor model.

Authors:  Mackenzie K Herroon; Rajgopal Sharma; Erandi Rajagurubandara; Claudia Turro; Jeremy J Kodanko; Izabela Podgorski
Journal:  Biol Chem       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.915

4.  Photoinduced ligand dissociation follows reverse energy gap law: nitrile photodissociation from low energy 3MLCT excited states.

Authors:  Lauren M Loftus; Jeffrey J Rack; Claudia Turro
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Studies of the pathways open to copper water oxidation catalysts containing proximal hydroxy groups during basic electrocatalysis.

Authors:  Deidra L Gerlach; Salome Bhagan; Alex A Cruce; Dalton B Burks; Ismael Nieto; Hai T Truong; Steven P Kelley; Corey J Herbst-Gervasoni; Katherine L Jernigan; Michael K Bowman; Shanlin Pan; Matthias Zeller; Elizabeth T Papish
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 5.165

6.  Influence of Protonation State on the Excited State Dynamics of a Photobiologically Active Ru(II) Dyad.

Authors:  Christian Reichardt; Tariq Sainuddin; Maria Wächtler; Susan Monro; Stephan Kupfer; Julien Guthmuller; Stefanie Gräfe; Sherri McFarland; Benjamin Dietzek
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.781

7.  Mechanistic study on the photochemical "light switch" behavior of [Ru(bpy)2dmdppz]2+.

Authors:  Erin Wachter; Edith C Glazer
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Synthesis, Characterization, Cytotoxic Activity, and Metabolic Studies of Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complexes Containing Flavonoid Ligands.

Authors:  Alexandra-Cristina Munteanu; Anna Notaro; Marta Jakubaszek; Joseph Cowell; Mickaël Tharaud; Bruno Goud; Valentina Uivarosi; Gilles Gasser
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Heteroleptic Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Bathophenanthroline and Bathophenanthroline Disulfonate Disodium Salt as Fluorescent Dyes for In-Gel Protein Staining.

Authors:  Maria V Babak; Pauline Le Faouder; Xavier Trivelli; Gopalakrishnan Venkatesan; Stanislav I Bezzubov; Mohammed Kajjout; Artem L Gushchin; Muhammad Hanif; Olivier Poizat; Hervé Vezin; Christian Rolando
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 10.  Biological activities of polypyridyl-type ligands: implications for bioinorganic chemistry and light-activated metal complexes.

Authors:  Austin C Hachey; Dmytro Havrylyuk; Edith C Glazer
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Factors that influence singlet oxygen formation vs. ligand substitution for light-activated ruthenium anticancer compounds.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Papish; Olaitan E Oladipupo
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 8.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.