Literature DB >> 35483128

Factors that influence singlet oxygen formation vs. ligand substitution for light-activated ruthenium anticancer compounds.

Elizabeth T Papish1, Olaitan E Oladipupo2.   

Abstract

This review focuses on light-activated ruthenium anticancer compounds and the factors that influence which pathway is favored. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is favored by π expansion and the presence of low-lying triplet excited states (e.g. 3MLCT, 3IL). Photoactivated chemotherapy (PACT) refers to light-driven ligand dissociation to give a toxic metal complex or a toxic ligand upon photo substitution. This process is driven by steric bulk near the metal center and weak metal-ligand bonds to create a low-energy 3MC state with antibonding character. With protic dihydroxybipyridine ligands, ligand charge can play a key role in these processes, with a more electron-rich deprotonated ligand favoring PDT and an electron-poor protonated ligand favoring PACT in several cases.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticancer; Diimine ligands; Photoactivated chemotherapy; Photochemistry; Photodissociation; Photodynamic therapy; Photosubstitution; Protic ligands; Ruthenium; pH responsive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35483128      PMCID: PMC9133143          DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2022.102143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.972


  69 in total

1.  Ruthenium Complexes are pH-Activated Metallo Prodrugs (pHAMPs) with Light-Triggered Selective Toxicity Toward Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Fengrui Qu; Seungjo Park; Kristina Martinez; Jessica L Gray; Fathima Shazna Thowfeik; John A Lundeen; Ashley E Kuhn; David J Charboneau; Deidra L Gerlach; Molly M Lockart; James A Law; Katherine L Jernigan; Nicole Chambers; Matthias Zeller; Nicholas A Piro; W Scott Kassel; Russell H Schmehl; Jared J Paul; Edward J Merino; Yonghyun Kim; Elizabeth T Papish
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Stimuli-Responsive Therapeutic Metallodrugs.

Authors:  Xiaohui Wang; Xiaoyong Wang; Suxing Jin; Nafees Muhammad; Zijian Guo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Predictive Strength of Photophysical Measurements for in Vitro Photobiological Activity in a Series of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes Derived from π-Extended Ligands.

Authors:  Christian Reichardt; Susan Monro; Fabian H Sobotta; Katsuya L Colón; Tariq Sainuddin; Mat Stephenson; Eric Sampson; John Roque; Huimin Yin; Johannes C Brendel; Colin G Cameron; Sherri McFarland; Benjamin Dietzek
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Cellular uptake of protic ruthenium complexes is influenced by pH dependent passive diffusion and energy dependent efflux.

Authors:  Seungjo Park; Jessica L Gray; Sarah D Altman; Angela R Hairston; Brianna T Beswick; Yonghyun Kim; Elizabeth T Papish
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.155

5.  A nuclear permeable Ru(ii)-based photoactivated chemotherapeutic agent towards a series of cancer cells: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Na Tian; Yang Feng; Weize Sun; Jian Lu; Songsong Lu; Yishan Yao; Chao Li; Xuesong Wang; Qianxiong Zhou
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.390

6.  Iron sensitizer converts light to electrons with 92% yield.

Authors:  Tobias C B Harlang; Yizhu Liu; Olga Gordivska; Lisa A Fredin; Carlito S Ponseca; Ping Huang; Pavel Chábera; Kasper S Kjaer; Helena Mateos; Jens Uhlig; Reiner Lomoth; Reine Wallenberg; Stenbjörn Styring; Petter Persson; Villy Sundström; Kenneth Wärnmark
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 24.427

7.  Mechanistic study on the photochemical "light switch" behavior of [Ru(bpy)2dmdppz]2+.

Authors:  Erin Wachter; Edith C Glazer
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.781

8.  Ruthenium dihydroxybipyridine complexes are tumor activated prodrugs due to low pH and blue light induced ligand release.

Authors:  Kyle T Hufziger; Fathima Shazna Thowfeik; David J Charboneau; Ismael Nieto; William G Dougherty; W Scott Kassel; Timothy J Dudley; Edward J Merino; Elizabeth T Papish; Jared J Paul
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 4.155

9.  Vacancy-enhanced generation of singlet oxygen for photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Shanyue Guan; Li Wang; Si-Min Xu; Di Yang; Geoffrey I N Waterhouse; Xiaozhong Qu; Shuyun Zhou
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 9.825

10.  Breaking the barrier: an osmium photosensitizer with unprecedented hypoxic phototoxicity for real world photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  John A Roque; Patrick C Barrett; Houston D Cole; Liubov M Lifshits; Ge Shi; Susan Monro; David von Dohlen; Susy Kim; Nino Russo; Gagan Deep; Colin G Cameron; Marta E Alberto; Sherri A McFarland
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.