Literature DB >> 31775072

Cellular uptake of protic ruthenium complexes is influenced by pH dependent passive diffusion and energy dependent efflux.

Seungjo Park1, Jessica L Gray2, Sarah D Altman2, Angela R Hairston2, Brianna T Beswick1, Yonghyun Kim3, Elizabeth T Papish4.   

Abstract

The lipophilic vs. hydrophilic properties of three protic ruthenium compounds were studied as a function of pH. Specifically, we measured Log(Do/w) values for [(N,N)2Ru(6,6'-dhbp)]2+ complexes (where N,N = 2,2'-bipyridine (1A), 1,10-phenanthroline (2A), 2,3-dihydro-[1,4]dioxino[2,3-f][1,10]phenanthroline (3A) and 6,6'-dhbp is the diprotic 6,6'-dihydroxy-2,2'-bipyridine ligand) from pH 4.0 to 8.0. This study allowed us to demonstrate that as the ligand is deprotonated at higher pH values the resulting neutral charge on the complex improves its lipophilic properties. Thus, improved uptake by passive diffusion is expected with protic ligands on Ru(II). Furthermore, cellular studies have demonstrated that passive diffusion is the dominant pathway for cellular uptake. However, metabolic inhibition has also shown that energy dependent efflux reduces the amount of the ruthenium complex (as measured by mean fluorescence intensity) in the cells. These compounds have been shown by fluorescence microscopy to accumulate in the nuclei of cancer cells (MCF7, MDA-MB-231, and HeLa). Taken together, this data shows that uptake is required for toxicity but uptake alone is not sufficient. The greatest light activated toxicity appears to occur in breast cancer cell lines with relatively moderate uptake (MCF7 and MDA-MB-231) rather than the cell line with the greatest uptake of complex 3A (normal breast cell line MCF-10A).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticancer; Cellular efflux; Cellular uptake; Photodynamic therapy; Protic ligands; Ruthenium

Year:  2019        PMID: 31775072      PMCID: PMC7012720          DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.110922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Inorg Biochem        ISSN: 0162-0134            Impact factor:   4.155


  3 in total

1.  Light-responsive and Protic Ruthenium Compounds Bearing Bathophenanthroline and Dihydroxybipyridine Ligands Achieve Nanomolar Toxicity towards Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Olaitan E Oladipupo; Spenser R Brown; Robert W Lamb; Jessica L Gray; Colin G Cameron; Alexa R DeRegnaucourt; Nicholas A Ward; James Fletcher Hall; Yifei Xu; Courtney M Petersen; Fengrui Qu; Ambar B Shrestha; Matthew K Thompson; Marco Bonizzoni; Charles Edwin Webster; Sherri A McFarland; Yonghyun Kim; Elizabeth T Papish
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 2.  Factors that influence singlet oxygen formation vs. ligand substitution for light-activated ruthenium anticancer compounds.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Papish; Olaitan E Oladipupo
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 8.972

3.  Singlet Oxygen Formation vs Photodissociation for Light-Responsive Protic Ruthenium Anticancer Compounds: The Oxygenated Substituent Determines Which Pathway Dominates.

Authors:  Fengrui Qu; Robert W Lamb; Colin G Cameron; Seungjo Park; Olaitan Oladipupo; Jessica L Gray; Yifei Xu; Houston D Cole; Marco Bonizzoni; Yonghyun Kim; Sherri A McFarland; Charles Edwin Webster; Elizabeth T Papish
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.165

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.