Literature DB >> 34398365

Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time?

Hassan Aziz1, Muhammad Khan2, Sara Khan3,4, Guillermo P Serra5, Martin D Goodman1, Yuri Genyk4, Mohd Raashid Sheikh6.   

Abstract

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has generated significant interest in recent years. Our study aimed to evaluate the difference in surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by either a robotic (RPD) or open approach (OPD). Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients from 2010 and 2017 diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by either robotic PD or open approach. Patients who underwent robotic PD during 2010 were compared to patients receiving the same procedure in 2017. In addition, a secondary analysis was performed to assess outcomes of robotic PD to open PD for the 2017 patient cohorts. Our primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, as well as 30-day readmission. Secondary outcome measures were surgical margins, lymph node yield, and adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 12 weeks of surgery. When we compared the 2017 data to 2010 data, we found that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy had lower 30- and 90-day mortality rates in 2017 compared to 2010. Additionally, we found that the lymph node yield in robotic PD increased during the study period. When we compared robotic PD to open PD for 2017, we found no statistically significant differences in readmission rates (10.1% vs. 9.7%: p-0.4), lymph node yield, or negative margin between the groups. Outcomes of robotic PD have improved over the years. In 2017, outcomes of robotic PD were similar to open PD.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Cancer Database; Open pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34398365     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01296-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  16 in total

Review 1.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Samuel W Ross; Ramanathan Seshadri; Ryan Z Swan; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  Robotic general surgery: current practice, evidence, and perspective.

Authors:  M Jung; P Morel; L Buehler; N C Buchs; M E Hagen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Robotic Surgery for Malignant Liver Disease: a Systematic Review of Oncological and Surgical Outcomes.

Authors:  Rafael Diaz-Nieto; Soumil Vyas; Dinesh Sharma; Hassan Malik; Stephen Fenwick; Graeme Poston
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-13

Review 4.  Current state of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Jason L Schwarz; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Future: Here and Now.

Authors:  Alexander Rosemurgy; Sharona Ross; Timothy Bourdeau; Danielle Craigg; Janelle Spence; Joshua Alvior; Iswanto Sucandy
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic and open pancreatectomy in a national cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Sharon B Winters; Richard Hoehn; Samer Tohme; Mohamed A Adam; David L Bartlett; Kenneth K Lee; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Samer Tohme; Richard Hoehn; Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Amer H Zureikat; Paniccia Alessandro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Fahd Shah; Irfan Ul Islam Nasir; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-05-15

9.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Michael A Choti; Matthew R Porembka; Adam C Yopp; Sam C Wang; Patricio M Polanco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Hassan Aziz; Muhammad Khan; Sara Khan; Guillermo P Serra; Martin D Goodman; Yuri Genyk; Mohd Raashid Sheikh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.