Literature DB >> 26261726

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Erin H Baker1, Samuel W Ross1, Ramanathan Seshadri1, Ryan Z Swan1, David A Iannitti1, Dionisios Vrochides1, John B Martinie1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has found new avenues for performing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) procedures, a historically technically challenging operation. Multiple studies have found laparoscopic PD to be safe, with equivalent oncologic outcomes as compared to open PD. In addition, several series have described potential benefits to minimally invasive PD including fewer postoperative complications, shorter hospital length of stay, and decreased postoperative pain. Yet, despite these promising initial results, laparoscopic PDs have not become widely adopted by the surgical community. In fact, the vast majority of pancreatic resections performed in the United States are still performed in an open fashion, and there are only a handful of surgeons who actually perform purely laparoscopic PDs. On the other hand, robotic assisted surgery offers many technical advantages over laparoscopic surgery including high-definition, 3-D optics, enhanced suturing ability, and more degrees of freedom of movement by means of fully-wristed instruments. Similar to laparoscopic PD, there are now several case series that have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of robotic PD with seemingly equivalent short-term oncologic outcomes as compared to open technique. In addition, having the surgeon seated for the procedure with padded arm-rests, there is an ergonomic advantage of robotics over both open and laparoscopic approaches, where one has to stand up for prolonged periods of time. Future technologic innovations will likely focus on enhanced robotic capabilities to improve ease of use in the operating room. Last but not least, robotic assisted surgery training will continue to be a part of surgical education curriculum ensuring the increased use of this technology by future generations of surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Whipple; innovation; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); operative technique; pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Year:  2015        PMID: 26261726      PMCID: PMC4502160          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  46 in total

1.  Completed laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Xiujun Cai; Yifan Wang; Hong Yu; Xiao Liang; Bin Xu; Shuyou Peng
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Josh Winer; Mehmet F Can; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Major venous resection during total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Michael L Kendrick; Guido M Sclabas
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases.

Authors:  Raffaele Pugliese; Ildo Scandroglio; Fabio Sansonna; Dario Maggioni; Andrea Costanzi; Davide Citterio; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Stefano Di Lernia; Carmelo Magistro
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.719

6.  A totally laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and reconstruction.

Authors:  Akihiro Cho; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Matsuo Nagata; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Hideaki Shimada; Osamu Kainuma; Hiroaki Souda; Hisashi Gunji; Akinari Miyazaki; Atsushi Ikeda; Tomoko Tohma
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Wen-Ming Wu; Lei You; Yu-Pei Zhao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; Dean J Mikami; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.327

10.  Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  U Boggi; S Signori; N De Lio; V G Perrone; F Vistoli; M Belluomini; C Cappelli; G Amorese; F Mosca
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michail Kornaropoulos; Demetrios Moris; Eliza W Beal; Marinos C Makris; Apostolos Mitrousias; Athanasios Petrou; Evangelos Felekouras; Adamantios Michalinos; Michail Vailas; Dimitrios Schizas; Alexandros Papalampros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Yuan-Xing Gao; Wan Yee Lau; Rong Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.

Authors:  Tze-Yi Low; Ye-Xin Koh; Brian Kp Goh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Timothy M Pawlik; Jordan M Cloyd
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Tao Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Xiang-Long Tan; Guo-Dong Zhao; Xuan Zhang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Value-based assessment of robotic pancreas and liver surgery.

Authors:  James C Patti; Ana Sofia Ore; Courtney Barrows; Vic Velanovich; A James Moser
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  Robotic Pancreatic Resections: Feasibility and Advantages.

Authors:  Roland S Croner
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  A Floortje van Oosten; Ding Ding; Joseph R Habib; Ahmer Irfan; Ryan K Schmocker; Elisabetta Sereni; Benedict Kinny-Köster; Michael Wright; Vincent P Groot; I Quintus Molenaar; John L Cameron; Martin Makary; Richard A Burkhart; William R Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Robotic versus standard open pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis comparison.

Authors:  Benedetto Ielpo; Riccardo Caruso; Hipolito Duran; Eduardo Diaz; Isabel Fabra; Luis Malavé; Yolanda Quijano; Emilio Vicente
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-03-26

10.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Richard Sola; Russell C Kirks; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.