Literature DB >> 33281400

Robotic Surgery for Malignant Liver Disease: a Systematic Review of Oncological and Surgical Outcomes.

Rafael Diaz-Nieto1, Soumil Vyas2, Dinesh Sharma3, Hassan Malik1, Stephen Fenwick1, Graeme Poston1.   

Abstract

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is yet another modification of minimally invasive liver surgery. It is described as feasible and safe from the surgical point of view; however, oncological outcomes need to be adequately analysed to justify the use of this technique when resecting malignant liver tumours. We reviewed existing English medical literature on robot-assisted laparoscopic liver surgery. We analysed surgical outcomes and oncological outcomes. We analysed operative parameters including operative time, type of hepatectomy, blood loss, conversion rate, morbidity and mortality rates and length of stay. We also analysed oncological outcomes including completeness of resection (R status), recurrence, survival and follow-up data. A total of 582 patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic liver surgery were analysed from 17 eligible publications. Only 5 publications reported survival data. The overall morbidity was 19% with 0.2% reported mortality. R0 resection was achieved in 96% of patients. Robotic liver surgery is feasible and safe with acceptable morbidity and oncological outcomes including resection margins. However, well-designed trials are required to provide evidence in terms of survival and disease-free intervals when performed for malignancy. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatectomy; Laparoscopy; Liver resection; Robotic surgery

Year:  2019        PMID: 33281400      PMCID: PMC7714835          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00945-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  41 in total

1.  A standard definition of major hepatectomy: resection of four or more liver segments.

Authors:  Srinevas K Reddy; Andrew S Barbas; Ryan S Turley; Jennifer L Steel; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; Bryan M Clary
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Frequency of lower urinary tract injury after gastrointestinal surgery in the nationwide inpatient sample database.

Authors:  Hari P Sawkar; Dae Y Kim; D Joseph Thum; Lee Zhao; John Cashy; Marc Bjurlin; Vishal Bhalani; Anne-Marie Boller; Shilajit Kundu
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  Robot-assisted liver surgery in a general surgery unit with a "Referral Centre Hub&Spoke Learning Program". Early outcomes after our first 70 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Graziano Ceccarelli; Enrico Andolfi; Andrea Fontani; Fulvio Calise; Aldo Rocca; Antonio Giuliani
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study.

Authors:  Oliver C Y Chan; Chung Ngai Tang; Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Michael K W Li
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.027

5.  Residual tumor (R) classification and prognosis.

Authors:  P Hermanek; C Wittekind
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Bladder injury during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Ostrzenski; K M Ostrzenska
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Surv       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.347

7.  Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yongzhi Yang; Feng Wang; Peng Zhang; Chenzhang Shi; Yang Zou; Huanlong Qin; Yanlei Ma
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Long-term Survival Analysis of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  Robotic resections in hepatobiliary oncology - initial experience with Xi da Vinci system in India.

Authors:  M Chandarana; S Patkar; A Tamhankar; S Garg; M Bhandare; M Goel
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.224

Review 10.  Systematic review of robotic liver resection.

Authors:  Cheng-Maw Ho; Go Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Nitta; Naoko Ito; Yasushi Hasegawa; Takeshi Takahara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Hassan Aziz; Muhammad Khan; Sara Khan; Guillermo P Serra; Martin D Goodman; Yuri Genyk; Mohd Raashid Sheikh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 2.  Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far.

Authors:  Reed I Ayabe; Ahad Azimuddin; Hop S Tran Cao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.895

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.